Skip to main content

Filed briefs

Amicus briefs filed by the CFPB are available on this page, including amicus briefs concerning federal consumer financial protection law filed in the U.S. Supreme Court by the Office of the Solicitor General.  

Use the filters below to browse by date, statute, and the court in which the brief was filed.

Date range
Clear filters
43 filtered results
Category: Federal Circuit Court |
Date filed

Henderson v. The Source for Public Data, L.P., et al

Federal Circuit Court

The Bureau, the Federal Trade Commission, and the North Carolina Department of Justice jointly filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit arguing that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does not bar a private plaintiff's claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Category: Federal Circuit Court |
Date filed

Gross v. CitiMortgage

Federal Circuit Court

The Bureau filed an amicus brief arguing that the Fair Credit Reporting Act does not exempt “legal disputes” from its requirement that furnishers of information to consumer reporting agencies must reasonably investigate disputes about information they furnished.

Category: Federal Circuit Court |
Date filed

Hopkins v. Collecto, Inc. et al.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

The Bureau filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit arguing that a debt collector does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act when it accurately states in an itemization of a consumer’s debt that $0.00 in interest and collection fees have been applied to the debt.

Category: Federal Circuit Court |
Date filed

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Navient Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

The Bureau filed a brief in the Third Circuit arguing that section 1042 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act, which permits states to bring actions to enforce the CFPA, does not prohibit a state from bringing an action against a defendant merely because the Bureau has already brought an action against the same defendant.

Category: Federal Circuit Court |
Date filed

Preston v. Midland Credit Management

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

In response to the 7th Circuit’s invitation, the Bureau filed an amicus brief arguing that there is no “benign language” exception to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act’s prohibition on debt collectors “using any language or symbol, other than the debt collector’s address, on any envelope when communicating with a consumer by use of the mails or by telegram, except that a debt collector may use his business name if such name does not indicate that he is in the debt collection business.” 

Category: Federal Circuit Court |
Date filed

Bender v. Elmore & Throop, P.C.

4th Circuit Court of Appeals

The Bureau filed an amicus brief addressing the one-year statute of limitations in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The brief argued that the FDCPA’s statute of limitations does not bar consumers from suing to challenge violations that occurred in the prior year, even if the defendant previously committed similar violations that are outside the limitations period.

Category: Federal Circuit Court |
Date filed

Continental Service Group v. United States

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals

The Bureau filed an amicus brief urging the Federal Circuit to conclude that a trial court injunction barring the Department of Education from assigning debt collectors to loans in default is inconsistent with the public interest.

Category: Federal Circuit Court |
Date filed

Strubel v. Comenity Bank

2nd Circuit Court of Appeals

This case presents the question of a private plaintiff’s standing under the Truth in Lending Act to bring an action for statutory damages for the alleged failure of a creditor to provide the account-opening disclosures required under 15 U.S.C. § 1637(a)(7) and its implementing regulation.