Washington, D.C. – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today announced in its Supervisory Highlights report that recent supervisory actions returned more than $11 million to more than 225,000 harmed consumers. The CFPB also uncovered student loan servicer violations, such as failing to enroll qualified borrowers in affordable federal loan repayment plans, and is issuing updated procedures for student loan servicing exams. The report also outlines violations found in auto loan origination and servicing, debt collection, and mortgage origination. Additionally, the report provides information on compliance with CFPB rules and regulations, new exam policies, and best practices for better communication with non-English-speaking consumers.
“Our examiners continue to find sloppy or callous practices among some student loan servicers and other financial institutions that violate the law and put consumers at risk,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “If their practices hurt consumers, they need to rethink and change their practices in light of the actions and observations found in this report.”
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act authorizes the CFPB to supervise banks and credit unions with more than $10 billion in assets and certain nonbanks, including mortgage companies, private student lenders, and payday lenders. The CFPB has issued rules to supervise the larger participants in certain markets including consumer reporting, debt collection, student loan servicing, international money transfers, and auto finance.
Today’s report, the 13th edition of Supervisory Highlights, is focused on supervisory work generally completed between May and August 2016. It includes issues CFPB examiners found in student loan servicing, auto loan origination and servicing, debt collection, and mortgage origination. Supervisory actions in the areas of deposits, mortgage servicing, and credit cards returned $11.3 million to consumers. Specific issues uncovered by CFPB examiners being addressed through supervisory or enforcement action include:
- Student loan servicers
unfairly denying or failing to approve qualified students’ affordable payment
Eligible borrowers with federal student loans have a legal right to affordable
payments based on their monthly income. A recent Bureau report found student loan borrowers may face needless
hurdles and wrongful rejections when trying to enroll in these plans. CFPB
examiners have found that one or more servicers are regularly and illegally
denying applications from qualified borrowers. These practices could trap
borrowers in payment plans they cannot afford, delay access to important
benefits, increase costs for consumers, and contribute to avoidable defaults.
The Department of Education has issued saying servicers must be more actively engaged with borrowers who do not have
- Auto loan servicers
illegally keeping borrowers’ belongings: CFPB examiners found one or more auto
loan servicers refused to return personal belongings from a borrower’s
repossessed car unless the borrower paid a storage fee. If borrowers did not
pay the fee in the allotted time, usually 30-45 days, depending on the state,
the companies would dispose of the property instead of returning it to the
It is an
illegal and unfair practice to refuse to return a consumer’s personal property
until a fee is paid.
- Debt collectors charging illegal fees, misleading consumers: Examiners found one or more debt collectors charged illegal payment processing fees and made misleading collection calls about consumers’ credit scores or reports. For instance, some debt collection employees misled consumers by falsely claiming immediate payments were needed to prevent damage to the consumer’s creditworthiness. The CFPB also found one or more collectors revealed information about debts to consumers’ friends and family during debt collection attempts, and failed to investigate consumer reporting disputes. These actions violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Some problems found during CFPB supervisory examinations are resolved without an enforcement action. Where Bureau examiners find violations of law or other significant problems or weaknesses, they alert the institution to these concerns, direct the institution to change its conduct, and outline necessary remedies.
Additional Compliance Information
Today, the Bureau is also releasing information on compliance with CFPB rules and regulations, new exam policies, and best practices for improving communication with non-English-speaking consumers. This includes:
- Revised exam procedures
for student lending and servicing: The Bureau’s revised exam procedures
enhance those that were devised in 2013, and are informed by more than two
years of supervisory
They address the gamut of servicing practices affecting borrowers from payment
processing and routine communications with borrowers, to the handling of
requests for payment relief by distressed borrowers. It will also guide
how examiners assess risks to consumers and review student
loan servicers’ compliance with federal consumer financial law. These
procedures build on the ongoing work by federal agencies and regulators to
strengthen student loan servicing practices, and note that servicers’ adherence
to Department of Education contracts and regulations may figure into Bureau
compliance reviews. They also provide a roadmap for state and local partners
implementing student loan servicing examination programs.
- Updates to CFPB guidance
on compliance for service providers: Under amended Bureau guidance for service providers, risk
management programs may
be tailored to the size, market, and level of risk
for consumer harm the service provider presents. The bulletin also notes
that appropriate risk management programs enhance compliance with federal
consumer financial laws and help avoid consumer harm.
- New exam procedures for
reverse mortgage servicing: Today’s report includes the Bureau’s new
for examining reverse mortgage servicers. These procedures provide details on
how Bureau examiners will review servicer’s compliance with applicable
- Assessing redlining risk: Redlining occurs when a lender provides unequal access
to credit or credit terms because of the race, color, national origin, or other
prohibited characteristic of those in the area where the credit seeker resides
or will reside, or the location of the residential property to be mortgaged. In
assessing whether redlining is occurring, Bureau supervisors will consider
demographics, credit profiles, lending patterns, comparisons to similar
institutions, marketing, and the institution's physical presence in a given area, among other factors.
- Language services for non-English-proficient consumers: The report includes findings on how institutions provide access to credit in languages other than English in a way that benefit both consumers and the institution, while helping ensure the actions comply with the law. These findings include marketing and servicing loans in languages other than English, translating financial documents sent to borrowers, providing language services to consumers with limited English language skills, and using bilingual customer service agents.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a 21st century agency that helps consumer finance markets work by making rules more effective, by consistently and fairly enforcing those rules, and by empowering consumers to take more control over their economic lives. For more information, visit .