Bank of America, N.A. v. Rose
In response to the Court’s call for the views of the Solicitor General, the government filed an amicus brief that argued that the Supreme Court should not review a decision of the California Supreme Court relating to the Truth in Savings Act (TISA). The amicus brief argued that the California Supreme Court correctly held that Congress has not preempted private actions brought under the state’s unfair competition law to the extent that liability is predicated on a violation of TISA. The brief also argued that the decision of the state supreme court did not conflict with any decision of the U.S. Supreme Court or a federal court of appeals.