{"took":384,"timed_out":false,"_shards":{"total":5,"successful":5,"skipped":0,"failed":0},"hits":{"total":{"value":8,"relation":"eq"},"max_score":null,"hits":[{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"7159606","_score":21.146767,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"I need to be able to place a credit freeze on my credit accounts to prevent unauthorized loans from being opened in my name, in no small part due to Equifax 's incompetence in allowing a breach of substantially all of their consumer data in XXXX. \n\nEquifax has been required by law to provide a free credit freeze service since XXXX. \n\nSince XXXX, I have attempted multiple times to open an account on the 'myEquifax ' website to be able to place a credit freeze. Every time I have logged into this account, I have received an HTTP 500 error from their web application, indicating an unexpected error in the software running on their web server. Competent software development operations consider a server returning an HTTP 500 to be an issue to be resolved quickly and task engineers with preventing them from recurring, as unexpected errors may lead to security problems and prevent them from fulfilling their legal obligations to customers, but Equifax appears not to run a competent software development organization or to care about customer experience. \n\nI have attempted at least three times to report this error so that I might gain access to an account to be able to freeze my credit, and have spent hours on the phone with Equifax customer service attempting to report this bug in their web application and seek a way to work around it. Equifax has never resolved this issue. I have never been able to freeze my credit with them. \n\nTheir customer service personnel at one time insulted me as lacking initiative and thus being unable to get anywhere in life because I was unwilling to locate a fax machine to work around their continued incompetence in building and maintaining a web application.","date_sent_to_company":"2023-06-23T19:04:59.000Z","issue":"Problem with fraud alerts or security freezes","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"11238","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"7159606","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"EQUIFAX, INC.","date_received":"2023-06-23T18:48:20.000Z","state":"NY","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":null},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I need to be able to place a credit freeze on my credit accounts to prevent <em>unauthorized</em> <em>loans</em> from <em>being</em> <em>opened</em> in my name, in no <em>small</em> <em>part</em> due to <em>Equifax</em> 's incompetence in allowing a breach of substantially all of their consumer data in XXXX. \n\n<em>Equifax</em> has been required by law to provide a free credit freeze service since XXXX. \n\nSince XXXX, I have attempted multiple times to <em>open</em> an account on the 'my<em>Equifax</em> ' website to be able to place a credit freeze."],"company":["<em>EQUIFAX</em>, INC."]},"sort":[21.146767,"7159606"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"15330527","_score":17.06231,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"I am filing this complaint against Equifax because they have repeatedly failed to ensure the accuracy of the information they are reporting on my credit file. Despite my rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), Equifax continues to publish false, incomplete, and misleading data that has caused serious harm to my credit reputation and financial well-being. \n\nFirst, Equifax is reporting an address, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, that is not mine. This address is inaccurate and associating me with it creates confusion and violates FCRA 607 ( b ), which requires consumer reporting agencies to maintain reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of information. \n\nEquifax is also reporting multiple accounts with late payments and charge-offs that are inaccurate and misleading. For example, the XXXX XXXX  account ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) opened on XX/XX/XXXX is showing late payments, even though the balance is {$0.00} and no late payments should be reflected. The XXXX account ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ) opened on XX/XX/XXXX is being reported as a charge-off with a {$420.00} balance, which is completely inaccurate and damaging. Another XXXX  account ( XXXX XXXX XXXX  ) opened on XX/XX/XXXX is also showing late payments even though it carries a {$0.00} balance. These are clear violations of FCRA 607 ( b ), as they show a failure to ensure accurate reporting. \n\nEquifax is also reporting a XXXX  account ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ) opened on XX/XX/XXXX as a charge-off with a {$0.00} balance. Reporting a charge-off when there is no balance is not only misleading but also a violation of my rights under the FCRA. Similarly, the XXXX XXXX  account ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ) opened on XX/XX/XXXX is reported as a charge-off with a {$510.00} balance that I dispute as inaccurate. \n\nThere are also multiple Department of EducationXXXX accounts ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) opened on XX/XX/XXXX showing late payments with balances of {$12000.00} and {$4900.00}. These accounts are being reported inconsistently and unfairly. Reporting duplicate or conflicting information like this is misleading and does not reflect the true status of my student loans. \n\nEquifax is further reporting a collection account from XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) opened on XX/XX/XXXX with a balance of {$880.00}. I dispute this debt entirely, and the reporting of it without proper verification is a violation of FCRA 611, which requires reasonable reinvestigation of disputed items. Another account from XXXX ( XXXXXXXX XXXX ) opened on XX/XX/XXXX is listed as a charge-off with a balance of {$1600.00}, which I also dispute as inaccurate. \n\nOn top of these false account reports, Equifax has allowed unauthorized and questionable inquiries to remain on my credit file. XXXX  ( XX/XX/XXXX ), XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ), and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX ) inquiries were not authorized by me and are being reported in violation of FCRA 604, which requires permissible purpose before releasing or reporting inquiries. \n\nAll of these issues combined show a clear pattern of negligence on Equifaxs part in maintaining my file. The FCRA guarantees me the right to accurate and fair reporting, and Equifax has failed to uphold this responsibility. These errors are not small ; they directly harm my credit standing, cause me to be denied financial opportunities, and create stress and reputational damage. \n\nI am requesting that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau investigate Equifaxs handling of my file, hold them accountable for violating the FCRA, and require them to correct or delete all of the inaccurate, unverifiable, and misleading information listed above.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-08-16T20:15:53.000Z","issue":"Improper use of your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"77049","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"15330527","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"EQUIFAX, INC.","date_received":"2025-08-16T20:13:18.000Z","state":"TX","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Reporting company used your report improperly"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Another account from XXXX ( XXXXXXXX XXXX ) <em>opened</em> on XX/XX/XXXX is listed as a charge-off with a balance of {$1600.00}, which I also dispute as inaccurate. \n\nOn top of these false account reports, <em>Equifax</em> has allowed <em>unauthorized</em> and questionable inquiries to remain on my credit file."],"company":["<em>EQUIFAX</em>, INC."]},"sort":[17.06231,"15330527"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"17250248","_score":11.984069,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"I, XXXX XXXX, am filing this complaint because my Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax credit reports contain multiple inaccurate items, accounts that appear to be the result of identity theft or a mixed file, and unauthorized inquiries. These errors are causing serious harm to my credit standing and violate my rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ).\n\nI am invoking my rights under FCRA sections 602A, 605B, 607 ( b ), 609 ( a ) and 609 ( e ), 611, and 623 ( a ) ( b ), as well as FDCPA sections 807 and 809 ( b ). I am requesting that the CFPB investigate the credit bureaus and the furnishers listed below, and that all unverifiable and fraudulent information be removed or blocked from my file.\n\n1. Inaccurate personal information / mixed file My credit report shows multiple addresses that are not accurate for me and appear to be tied to fraudulent or mixed-file activity, including : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, IL XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX, IL XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, IL XXXX Reporting incorrect and mixed personal information violates FCRA XXXX and 607 ( b ), which require reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy. Because some of these items are connected to accounts that I am disputing as identity theft, I am also invoking FCRA 605B and asking that any information resulting from identity theft be blocked.\n\n2. Unauthorized and unverified hard inquiries My Experian report shows multiple hard inquiries that I do not recognize or did not authorize, including but not limited to : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Under FCRA 604 ( a ) ( 2 ) and 609 ( e ), the bureaus and furnishers must have a permissible purpose and must be able to provide documentation showing that I authorized these pulls. Any inquiry for which they can not provide proper authorization and documentation should be deleted.\n\n3. Accounts that are not mine, are fraudulent, or contain serious inaccuracies The following accounts are appearing on my Experian report and are either not mine, the result of identity theft or a mixed file, or are being reported inaccurately : Credit cards : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX balance around XXXX dollars, reported with late payment. \nXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX another XXXX XXXX entry with a higher balance and late payment. \nXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX  balance around XXXX dollars, shown as potentially negative. \n\nXXXX or XXXX : XXXXXXXX XXXX balance around XXXX dollars. \n\nAuto loans or leases : XXXX XXXX XXXX approximately XXXX dollars, reported with late payment. \nXXXX XXXX XXXX reported with a XXXX balance but still flagged as potentially negative. \nXXXX XXXX approximately XXXX dollars, flagged as potentially negative. \n\nStudent loans : Multiple Department of Education XXXX XXXX loans, each showing late payment, with balances around XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; and XXXX dollars, with recent update dates in XXXX. Some of these appear to be duplicate tradelines for the same underlying obligation and are being reported with repeated late payment histories. \n\nBuy now pay later / personal loans : Several XXXX XXXX accounts, each marked late payment, with balances around XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; and XXXX dollars, updated in XX/XX/XXXX. These appear duplicative and I do not recognize all of them as mine. \n\nCollections : XXXX XXXX XXXX reporting a collection with XXXX XXXX XXXX as the original creditor in the amount of approximately XXXX dollars. \n\nMany of the above accounts are either not mine, appear to be duplicate or split tradelines, or have been reported with inaccurate balances, dates, and late payment histories. I have not been provided with any signed contracts, original applications, or other documents proving that I opened or authorized these specific accounts. Under FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ), furnishers may not report information they know or should know is inaccurate, and under 623 ( b ) they must conduct a reasonable investigation when notified of a dispute. For any account that can not be fully verified with original documentation showing I opened it, I am requesting that it be deleted or blocked as identity theft under FCRA 605B. \nXXXX. Duplicated entries and inconsistent reporting My report shows multiple nearly identical entries for Department of EducationXXXX and multiple small XXXX accounts. These look like the same debts being reported multiple times and with repeated late history. XXXX is reporting as potentially negative with a XXXX balance, which is misleading. Duplicate and inconsistent reporting violates FCRA 607 ( b ) and 623 ( a ) ( 2 ), because the information is not maximally accurate and artificially damages my creditworthiness.\n\n5. Collection reporting without proper validation XXXX XXXX XXXX is reporting a collection account for XXXX XXXX XXXX in the amount of about XXXX dollars. I have not received full validation of this debt. They have not provided an itemized statement, proof of assignment or purchase, or a copy of any original signed contract. Under FDCPA 809 ( b ) and FCRA 623, if a debt collector or furnisher can not validate the debt and show it actually belongs to me, it should not be reported and must be removed.\n\n6. Bankruptcy reporting My report includes a XXXX XXXX  bankruptcy public record from XXXX. I want to ensure the filing date, status date, and all associated data are being reported correctly and not being used to extend the reporting period or to connect me to accounts that are not mine. If any part of this public record is inaccurate or is being used beyond the allowed time limits under FCRA 605 ( a ), it should be corrected or removed.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-11-14T22:00:20.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"60490","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"17250248","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"EQUIFAX, INC.","date_received":"2025-11-14T21:59:44.000Z","state":"IL","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Information belongs to someone else"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I want to ensure the filing date, status date, and all associated data are <em>being</em> reported correctly and not <em>being</em> used to extend the reporting period or to connect me to accounts that are not mine. If any <em>part</em> of this public record is inaccurate or is <em>being</em> used beyond the allowed time limits under FCRA 605 ( a ), it should be corrected or removed."],"company":["<em>EQUIFAX</em>, INC."]},"sort":[11.984069,"17250248"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"17248976","_score":11.960054,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"I, XXXX XXXX, am filing this complaint because my Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax credit reports contain multiple inaccurate items, accounts that appear to be the result of identity theft or a mixed file, and unauthorized inquiries. These errors are causing serious harm to my credit standing and violate my rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ).\n\nI am invoking my rights under FCRA sections 602A, 605B, 607 ( b ), 609 ( a ) and 609 ( e ), 611, and 623 ( a ) ( b ), as well as FDCPA sections 807 and 809 ( b ). I am requesting that the CFPB investigate the credit bureaus and the furnishers listed below, and that all unverifiable and fraudulent information be removed or blocked from my file.\n\n1. Inaccurate personal information / mixed file My credit report shows multiple addresses that are not accurate for me and appear to be tied to fraudulent or mixed-file activity, including : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, IL XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX, IL XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, IL XXXX Reporting incorrect and mixed personal information violates FCRA XXXX and 607 ( b ), which require reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy. Because some of these items are connected to accounts that I am disputing as identity theft, I am also invoking FCRA 605B and asking that any information resulting from identity theft be blocked.\n\n2. Unauthorized and unverified hard inquiries My Experian report shows multiple hard inquiries that I do not recognize or did not authorize, including but not limited to : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Under FCRA 604 ( a ) ( 2 ) and 609 ( e ), the bureaus and furnishers must have a permissible purpose and must be able to provide documentation showing that I authorized these pulls. Any inquiry for which they can not provide proper authorization and documentation should be deleted.\n\n3. Accounts that are not mine, are fraudulent, or contain serious inaccuracies The following accounts are appearing on my Experian report and are either not mine, the result of identity theft or a mixed file, or are being reported inaccurately : Credit cards : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX balance around XXXX dollars, reported with late payment. \nXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX another XXXX XXXX entry with a higher balance and late payment. \nXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX  balance around XXXX dollars, shown as potentially negative. \n\nXXXX or XXXX : XXXXXXXX XXXX balance around XXXX dollars. \n\nAuto loans or leases : XXXX XXXX XXXX approximately XXXX dollars, reported with late payment. \nXXXX XXXX XXXX reported with a XXXX balance but still flagged as potentially negative. \nXXXX XXXX approximately XXXX dollars, flagged as potentially negative. \n\nStudent loans : Multiple Department of Education XXXX XXXX loans, each showing late payment, with balances around XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; and XXXX dollars, with recent update dates in XXXX. Some of these appear to be duplicate tradelines for the same underlying obligation and are being reported with repeated late payment histories. \n\nBuy now pay later / personal loans : Several XXXX XXXX accounts, each marked late payment, with balances around XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; and XXXX dollars, updated in XX/XX/XXXX. These appear duplicative and I do not recognize all of them as mine. \n\nCollections : XXXX XXXX XXXX reporting a collection with XXXX XXXX XXXX as the original creditor in the amount of approximately XXXX dollars. \n\nMany of the above accounts are either not mine, appear to be duplicate or split tradelines, or have been reported with inaccurate balances, dates, and late payment histories. I have not been provided with any signed contracts, original applications, or other documents proving that I opened or authorized these specific accounts. Under FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ), furnishers may not report information they know or should know is inaccurate, and under 623 ( b ) they must conduct a reasonable investigation when notified of a dispute. For any account that can not be fully verified with original documentation showing I opened it, I am requesting that it be deleted or blocked as identity theft under FCRA 605B. \nXXXX. Duplicated entries and inconsistent reporting My report shows multiple nearly identical entries for Department of EducationXXXX and multiple small XXXX accounts. These look like the same debts being reported multiple times and with repeated late history. XXXX is reporting as potentially negative with a XXXX balance, which is misleading. Duplicate and inconsistent reporting violates FCRA 607 ( b ) and 623 ( a ) ( 2 ), because the information is not maximally accurate and artificially damages my creditworthiness.\n\n5. Collection reporting without proper validation XXXX XXXX XXXX is reporting a collection account for XXXX XXXX XXXX in the amount of about XXXX dollars. I have not received full validation of this debt. They have not provided an itemized statement, proof of assignment or purchase, or a copy of any original signed contract. Under FDCPA 809 ( b ) and FCRA 623, if a debt collector or furnisher can not validate the debt and show it actually belongs to me, it should not be reported and must be removed.\n\n6. Bankruptcy reporting My report includes a XXXX XXXX  bankruptcy public record from XXXX. I want to ensure the filing date, status date, and all associated data are being reported correctly and not being used to extend the reporting period or to connect me to accounts that are not mine. If any part of this public record is inaccurate or is being used beyond the allowed time limits under FCRA 605 ( a ), it should be corrected or removed.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-11-14T22:00:13.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"60490","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"17248976","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Experian Information Solutions Inc.","date_received":"2025-11-14T21:53:28.000Z","state":"IL","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Information belongs to someone else"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I want to ensure the filing date, status date, and all associated data are <em>being</em> reported correctly and not <em>being</em> used to extend the reporting period or to connect me to accounts that are not mine. If any <em>part</em> of this public record is inaccurate or is <em>being</em> used beyond the allowed time limits under FCRA 605 ( a ), it should be corrected or removed."]},"sort":[11.960054,"17248976"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"17250249","_score":11.953725,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"I, XXXX XXXX, am filing this complaint because my Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax credit reports contain multiple inaccurate items, accounts that appear to be the result of identity theft or a mixed file, and unauthorized inquiries. These errors are causing serious harm to my credit standing and violate my rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ).\n\nI am invoking my rights under FCRA sections 602A, 605B, 607 ( b ), 609 ( a ) and 609 ( e ), 611, and 623 ( a ) ( b ), as well as FDCPA sections 807 and 809 ( b ). I am requesting that the CFPB investigate the credit bureaus and the furnishers listed below, and that all unverifiable and fraudulent information be removed or blocked from my file.\n\n1. Inaccurate personal information / mixed file My credit report shows multiple addresses that are not accurate for me and appear to be tied to fraudulent or mixed-file activity, including : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, IL XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX, IL XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, IL XXXX Reporting incorrect and mixed personal information violates FCRA XXXX and 607 ( b ), which require reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy. Because some of these items are connected to accounts that I am disputing as identity theft, I am also invoking FCRA 605B and asking that any information resulting from identity theft be blocked.\n\n2. Unauthorized and unverified hard inquiries My Experian report shows multiple hard inquiries that I do not recognize or did not authorize, including but not limited to : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Under FCRA 604 ( a ) ( 2 ) and 609 ( e ), the bureaus and furnishers must have a permissible purpose and must be able to provide documentation showing that I authorized these pulls. Any inquiry for which they can not provide proper authorization and documentation should be deleted.\n\n3. Accounts that are not mine, are fraudulent, or contain serious inaccuracies The following accounts are appearing on my Experian report and are either not mine, the result of identity theft or a mixed file, or are being reported inaccurately : Credit cards : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX balance around XXXX dollars, reported with late payment. \nXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX another XXXX XXXX entry with a higher balance and late payment. \nXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX  balance around XXXX dollars, shown as potentially negative. \n\nXXXX or XXXX : XXXXXXXX XXXX balance around XXXX dollars. \n\nAuto loans or leases : XXXX XXXX XXXX approximately XXXX dollars, reported with late payment. \nXXXX XXXX XXXX reported with a XXXX balance but still flagged as potentially negative. \nXXXX XXXX approximately XXXX dollars, flagged as potentially negative. \n\nStudent loans : Multiple Department of Education XXXX XXXX loans, each showing late payment, with balances around XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; and XXXX dollars, with recent update dates in XXXX. Some of these appear to be duplicate tradelines for the same underlying obligation and are being reported with repeated late payment histories. \n\nBuy now pay later / personal loans : Several XXXX XXXX accounts, each marked late payment, with balances around XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; and XXXX dollars, updated in XX/XX/XXXX. These appear duplicative and I do not recognize all of them as mine. \n\nCollections : XXXX XXXX XXXX reporting a collection with XXXX XXXX XXXX as the original creditor in the amount of approximately XXXX dollars. \n\nMany of the above accounts are either not mine, appear to be duplicate or split tradelines, or have been reported with inaccurate balances, dates, and late payment histories. I have not been provided with any signed contracts, original applications, or other documents proving that I opened or authorized these specific accounts. Under FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ), furnishers may not report information they know or should know is inaccurate, and under 623 ( b ) they must conduct a reasonable investigation when notified of a dispute. For any account that can not be fully verified with original documentation showing I opened it, I am requesting that it be deleted or blocked as identity theft under FCRA 605B. \nXXXX. Duplicated entries and inconsistent reporting My report shows multiple nearly identical entries for Department of EducationXXXX and multiple small XXXX accounts. These look like the same debts being reported multiple times and with repeated late history. XXXX is reporting as potentially negative with a XXXX balance, which is misleading. Duplicate and inconsistent reporting violates FCRA 607 ( b ) and 623 ( a ) ( 2 ), because the information is not maximally accurate and artificially damages my creditworthiness.\n\n5. Collection reporting without proper validation XXXX XXXX XXXX is reporting a collection account for XXXX XXXX XXXX in the amount of about XXXX dollars. I have not received full validation of this debt. They have not provided an itemized statement, proof of assignment or purchase, or a copy of any original signed contract. Under FDCPA 809 ( b ) and FCRA 623, if a debt collector or furnisher can not validate the debt and show it actually belongs to me, it should not be reported and must be removed.\n\n6. Bankruptcy reporting My report includes a XXXX XXXX  bankruptcy public record from XXXX. I want to ensure the filing date, status date, and all associated data are being reported correctly and not being used to extend the reporting period or to connect me to accounts that are not mine. If any part of this public record is inaccurate or is being used beyond the allowed time limits under FCRA 605 ( a ), it should be corrected or removed.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-11-14T22:00:24.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"60490","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"17250249","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.","date_received":"2025-11-14T21:59:44.000Z","state":"IL","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Information belongs to someone else"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I want to ensure the filing date, status date, and all associated data are <em>being</em> reported correctly and not <em>being</em> used to extend the reporting period or to connect me to accounts that are not mine. If any <em>part</em> of this public record is inaccurate or is <em>being</em> used beyond the allowed time limits under FCRA 605 ( a ), it should be corrected or removed."]},"sort":[11.953725,"17250249"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"13913692","_score":10.783852,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"This communication serves as a corrected and expanded formal demand under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and XXXX XXXX compliance standards regarding numerous inaccurate, unverifiable, and non-compliant tradelines being reported on my XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX consumer credit files. \n\nThe previous complaint I submitted included incorrect XXXX XXXX account numbers due to formatting issues in my credit report. Please consider this the official and corrected dispute with all verified and accurate information presented below. The continued presence of these false and duplicate entries has caused me significant financial harm, reputational damage, and emotional distress. If these violations are not corrected and permanently deleted within 15 calendar days, I will pursue civil claims under FCRA 616 and 617, along with all applicable legal remedies. \n\nDUPLICATE & CONFLICTING XXXX XXXX ACCOUNTS Multiple XXXX XXXX tradelines are being reported using the same account number prefix ( # XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ), yet the balances, dates opened, and statuses conflict across bureaus : A XXXX account opened XX/XX/XXXX, shows a balance of {$2700.00}, status closed and paid, on XXXX \n\nThe same account number appears on XXXX opened XX/XX/XXXX, also with a {$2700.00} balance and paid status. \n\nAnother tradeline with the same number is shown opened XX/XX/XXXX, on XXXX with a {$2300.00} balance and marked 30 days late. \n\nXXXX reports the same {$2300.00} balance, opened XX/XX/XXXX, but shows it as paid. \n\nA third variation is reported with a balance of {$15000.00}, opened XX/XX/XXXX, and marked refinanced on XXXX. \n\nXXXX again lists the same account number opened XX/XX/XXXX, with a {$15000.00} balance and also marked refinanced. \n\nAnother entry shows the account opened XX/XX/XXXX, with a balance of {$12000.00} and status closed current on XXXX \n\nXXXX lists it as opened XX/XX/XXXX, with the same balance but again reported as a separate closed account. \n\nThese discrepancies violate FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) for furnishing inaccurate information, FCRA 611 ( a ) for failing to reinvestigate, and Metro 2 guidelines for allowing duplicate tradelines with inconsistent statuses and missing dispute flags. This is clear evidence of duplicate reporting under the same account number across multiple dates and statuses. \n\nXXXX XXXX Account # XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ( Auto Loan ) * * This charged-off auto loan is being reported to both XXXX and Experian, but is missing entirely from Equifax. The account is listed as opened on XX/XX/XXXX, by TransUnion, and XX/XX/XXXX, by XXXX yet both report the exact same account number and loan terms. This inconsistency in the date of origination is a direct violation of XXXX XXXX reporting standards and FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ), which mandates accurate and uniform data furnishing across bureaus. \n\nThe account was closed and charged off on XX/XX/XXXX, with a reported balance of {$21000.00}. Despite this, both bureaus continue to show a past due amount of {$21000.00}, even though the account is already marked as charged off. This is impermissible under XXXX XXXX, which clearly states that once an account is charged off, no ongoing delinquency or past due amount should be reported unless the consumer has resumed payments which has not occurred here. \n\nFurthermore, neither bureau accurately reflects the dispute history. Experian includes language indicating a dispute ( subscriber reports dispute resolved consumer disagrees ), yet fails to apply the required XXXX XXXX dispute code ( XB ), and TransUnion falsely states account not disputed despite the same derogatory tradeline being under dispute. This constitutes violations under FCRA XXXX ( a ) and XXXX ( a ) ( XXXX ) for misrepresenting or omitting dispute notations. \n\nAdditionally, both bureaus report a {$0.00} credit limit on a high-balance installment auto loan. This is materially misleading. A {$21000.00} auto loan should reflect either the original amount financed or a structured term limit not zero. This erroneous limit inflates my utilization ratios and impairs my creditworthiness, in violation of XXXX XXXX formatting rules and FCRA 623 ( a ). \n\nLastly, the complete absence of this account from XXXX may indicate selective furnishing, data suppression, or inconsistent transmission all of which violate FCRA 1681e ( b ) and undermine the integrity of my consumer file. \n\nViolations Identified : FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) : Conflicting opening dates and false credit limit reporting FCRA 611 ( a ) : Inconsistent dispute response and reinvestigation failure FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 3 ) : Dispute flag not applied FCRA 1681e ( b ) : Failure to furnish complete and accurate data to all bureaus XXXX XXXX Violations : Duplicate account number with inconsistent open dates Charge-off status paired with active past due balance Improper credit limit reporting Missing dispute code No Equifax reporting XXXX NEGATIVE ACCOUNTS : XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX. Account # XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Reported Limit : {$250.00} ( secured card ) Reported High Balance : {$430.00} impossible on a {$250.00} secured line Past Due Amount : {$180.00} on a closed, charged-off account No 1099-C issued, no payment since XXXX Violations : XXXX XXXX : Conflicting high balance and charge-off coding on a closed secured account FCRA 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) : No supporting charge-off documentation FCRA 623 ( a ) : Knowingly reporting unverifiable, mathematically impossible data XXXX. XXXX Account # XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  This collection account is reported on all three bureaus XXXX XXXX and XXXX  with multiple conflicting data points, inaccurate classifications, and unresolved dispute flags. The errors are detailed below : 1. Conflicting Account Status Across Bureaus XXXX : Status is Closed XXXX : Status is Closed XXXX : Status is Open This inconsistency directly contradicts XXXX XXXX standards. A collection account can not be both open and closed simultaneously across credit bureaus. \n\nViolation : FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) : Inconsistent, inaccurate information being furnished XXXX XXXX Compliance : Status codes must match if the same account is being reported to multiple bureaus 2. Contradictory Dispute Flags XXXX : Account not disputed XXXX  : Account not disputed XXXX : Account disputed Consumer disputes this account information If I have disputed this account with any one bureau, all furnishers are required to investigate and ensure that dispute notations are consistent across all bureaus. Failing to do so violates the consumers rights under FCRA.\n\nViolation : FCRA 611 ( a ) : Inconsistent handling and failure to report dispute resolution uniformly XXXX XXXX : Dispute flags must be present and consistent across all systems 3. Inconsistent Creditor Remarks XXXX : Collection account information disputed by consumer, meets FCRA requirements Experian : Customer disputed account reported by subscriber. Account seriously past due ; assigned to collection agency or internal recovery. \n\nXXXX  : Consumer disputes this account information. XXXXollection account. \n\nEach CRA presents a different narrative, despite reporting the same account and balance. XXXX XXXX mandates that commentary and dispute remarks must be standardized to prevent misleading or confusing entries. \n\nViolation : FCRA 1681e ( b ) : Failure to ensure maximum accuracy of data XXXX XXXX Compliance : Mismatched commentary and remarks across furnishers 4. Inaccurate Payment Status Reporting XXXX & XXXX : Listed as \" Collection/Chargeoff '' XXXX : Listed as \" Late 120 Days '' A collection account can not simultaneously be labeled late 120 days. Once an account is in collections, it is charged off and closed, and should not carry an active delinquency aging status such as late 120. \n\nViolation : XXXX XXXX Violation : Improper account aging and status coding FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) : Inconsistent and inaccurate representation of account status 5. Identity Misassociation via Address History This account is also linked to XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX GA, an address you have never resided at, as confirmed in your prior disputes. This points to potential identity theft or mixed file contamination. \n\nViolation : FCRA 605B : Consumer identity mismatch or identity theft-related entry FCRA 1681e ( b ) : Failure to match consumer identity with sufficient accuracy Summary of Violations : FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) : Reporting materially inconsistent, unverifiable account data FCRA 611 ( a ) : Failure to update and reflect dispute status across all bureaus FCRA 605B : Reporting data tied to a fraudulent or incorrect address FCRA 1681e ( b ) : Failure to maintain accurate and complete file XXXX XXXX Compliance Breaches : Improper status codes, open/closed mismatch, missing dispute flags, misclassified aging statuses {$7200.00} balance with zero payment activity Tradeline classification varies per bureau Violations : FCRA 605B : Identity theft component address not linked to me XXXX XXXX : Discrepant open/closed statuses and activity dates FCRA 1681e ( b ) : Failure to ensure accuracy and proper identity linkage 3. XXXX XXXXXXXX Account # XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX This account is being inaccurately reported by both TransUnion and Experian, with Equifax failing to report the account at all. The following issues constitute serious violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and XXXX XXXX compliance standards : False Late Payments on {$0.00} Balance : TransUnion reports a 30-day late payment in XX/XX/XXXX and a 60-day late payment in XX/XX/XXXX, despite the account showing a {$0.00} balance, no past due amount, and a final payment made on XX/XX/XXXX. The account was closed on XX/XX/XXXX. Reporting delinquencies on an account that was current, paid, and not past due is factually incorrect and damaging. \n\nInconsistent Dispute Resolution Status : XXXX notes : Dispute resolved ; reported by grantor. \nXXXX notes : Account was in dispute now resolved reported by subscriber. \nXXXX reports nothing at all, not even the existence of the account. This failure to maintain consistent post-dispute notations is a clear violation of FCRA 611 ( a ).\n\nMissing Reporting on XXXX  : The account is completely missing from XXXX which raises concerns about selective furnishing, data suppression, or compliance issues with reporting obligations. All credit reporting agencies must furnish complete and uniform data, and this omission directly undermines the integrity of my credit profile. \n\nXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX : The reported high balance is {$270.00}, while the credit limit is only {$220.00}. No explanation or over-limit authorization coding is present. This may reflect a XXXX XXXX formatting error or unauthorized over-limit reporting, which inflates utilization ratios and causes unnecessary credit score damage.\n\nViolations Committed : FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) : Furnishing knowingly inaccurate or unverifiable information FCRA 611 ( a ) : Failure to consistently report dispute results across all CRAs FCRA 1681e ( b ) : Incomplete and inconsistent reporting across bureaus FCRA 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) : No documentation supporting over-limit balance has been provided XXXX XXXX Guidelines Violated : Improper status codes, unresolved dispute flags, and high balance inconsistencies Violations : FCRA 604 ( a ) ( 3 ) : No authorization or legitimate credit transaction FCRA 609 ( a ) : Failure to disclose inquiry basis FCRA XXXX : Willful/negligent access with no consumer consent XXXX Account # XXXX ( Secured Loan ) This account is reported by both XXXX  and XXXX and is missing entirely from XXXX It is listed as a secured loan with a high balance of {$720.00}, and a final payment made on XX/XX/XXXX. However, multiple reporting inconsistencies and XXXX 2/FCRA violations are present across the bureaus. \n\nThe TransUnion tradeline states that the account was opened on XX/XX/XXXX, while Experian reports the opening date as XX/XX/XXXX. Although a small variance, XXXX XXXX compliance standards require uniformity across all CRAs. There is no valid reason for conflicting origination dates on a closed installment loan. \n\nThe account was closed on XX/XX/XXXX, with a {$0.00} balance and no past due amount, yet XXXX falsely reports a 30 days late payment status. XXXX correctly shows the status as Current and does not report any delinquencies. Reporting a 30-day late on a {$0.00} balance account with no past due amount is both factually impossible and materially misleading. It causes undue harm to the consumer 's payment history and credit score. \n\nNo documentation of a late payment has been provided, and the final payment date listed on both bureaus ( XX/XX/XXXX ) shows the account was in good standing at the time of closure. This clearly indicates either a data error or wrongful derogatory coding on XXXX part. \n\nFurthermore, XXXX has no record of this account, despite it being a closed, paid loan which may reflect selective furnishing or failure to report uniformly. All tradelines should be consistently reported across all bureaus unless the consumer has opted out or the data has been suppressed post-dispute. \n\nViolations Committed : FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) : Reporting inaccurate and unverifiable payment history FCRA 1681e ( b ) : Failure to ensure maximum accuracy of information across CRAs FCRA 611 ( a ) : Failure to update or correct false information post-dispute XXXX XXXX Violations : Conflicting open dates between bureaus Improper late payment status on a paid {$0.00} balance account Missing reporting entirely on Equifax : UNAUTHORIZED HARD INQUIRIES ( NO PERMISSIBLE PURPOSE ) The following XXXX hard inquiries were reported on my TransUnion file, yet I have no associated applications, approvals, or open tradelines with these entities : Company Date Bureau XXXX XXXXXXXX XX/XX/XXXX NEIGHBORS BA XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX SYNCB/SAMS XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  None of these inquiries resulted in a loan or credit approval. I did not authorize these parties to access my consumer file. They have materially damaged my score. Violations : FCRA 604 ( a ) Lack of permissible purpose for access FCRA 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) Failure to provide documentation upon request FCRA 616 & 617 Willful and negligent access causing harm XXXX XXXX : Lack of matching tradelines tied to inquiry originators","date_sent_to_company":"2025-06-05T22:44:38.000Z","issue":"Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"303XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"13913692","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION","date_received":"2025-06-05T22:44:14.000Z","state":"GA","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Their investigation did not fix an error on your report"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["XXXX XXXX Account # XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ( Auto <em>Loan</em> ) * * This charged-off auto <em>loan</em> is <em>being</em> reported to both XXXX and Experian, but is missing entirely from <em>Equifax</em>. The account is listed as <em>opened</em> on XX/XX/XXXX, by TransUnion, and XX/XX/XXXX, by XXXX yet both report the exact same account number and <em>loan</em> terms."]},"sort":[10.783852,"13913692"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"14284555","_score":5.00086,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Original Account Number is unknown DOB is XX/XX/XXXX, and the last 4 SSN is XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Litonia, GA XXXX Equifax : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, GA XXXX Experian : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, XXXX, TX XXXX TransUnion : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, XXXX, PA XXXX Dear CFPB, FTC, and Credit Bureaus, I am writing to file a formal complaint against all three credit reporting agencies regarding identity theft. In XX/XX/XXXX, after discovering my identity had been stolen, I contacted all three credit reporting agencies, the original creditors, and the collection agencies. I also placed a freeze on my credit accounts and filed a police report. \n\nWith nearly 30 years of experience as a private investigator, primarily tracking fraud, I recognize the type of theft committed against me as synthetic identity theft or synthetic fraud. This form of identity theft involves fraudsters making minimum payments to gain more credit before eventually defaulting.\n\nI was severely injured with a XXXX XXXX, XXXX, ribs, and a XXXX XXXX XXXX, which resulted in two years of hospitalization for therapy, followed by an additional year due to XXXX, further surgeries, and therapy. Currently, I am still hospitalized with no set release date, which has significantly hindered my ability to communicate with the credit reporting agencies, as they only correspond by mail. Although I offered my medical information to them, they declined due to HIPAA. However, to prove my whereabouts for the past three years and resolve this nightmare, I am willing to provide your agency with access to my medical file. \n\nFurthermore, I can provide proof that my mail was compromised, including a letter from my bank stating that unknown individuals attempted to access my account from my cell phone number. The bank placed them on hold when they could not verify my password. They tried to reach me, but I was in the XXXX  at the time. My account was subsequently put on hold until I could speak with the bank and visit in person with my identification. My local branch, where I am well-known, can confirm the attempted identity theft on my account. My account was also linked for automatic payments on these fraudulent accounts, leading me to believe the two ladies hired to assist me for medical reasons had access to my address for the purpose of entering and cleaning. My home is equipped with 18 cameras that record 24/7, but footage must be backed up within seven days to avoid being recorded over.\n\n1. The account for XXXX XXXX XXXX has two different amounts listed on each report. ( XXXX ) They failed to validate the debt as requested in XXXX, and the original creditor failed to validate the dispute and the debt 2. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX failed to validate the debt for the XXXX XXXX, and the original creditor failed as well. XXXX  was removed from Trans Union but remains on the other agencies, with a threat to add it back onto TransUnion by the collection agency 3. XXXX XXXX and XXXX were opened by the same company. The collection agency failed to respond, and the original creditor failed to properly respond timely manner and based their findings on personal beliefs. \n4. My account with XXXX and XXXX  XXXX XXXX is the only account that belongs to me. XXXX  is not accurate for the three late payments. I spoke with them several times and have the recording with them stating it will be updated as pays as agree. My bank stopped the automatic payments after my account was flagged by the fraud department. It was money that ahd accumulated on XXXX ( for my XXXX XXXX XXXX ) that would have cleared the ayments. I was told not to worry because they cover me for ninety days.\n\n5. I am being penalized by the bureaus and they are accepting whatever creditors and collection agencies say with no valid information. None of the creditors original creditors or the collection agencies had provided me with validation of the debts or the 623 dispute and validation pursuant to the FCRA. I am also locked out of all my accounts oline and can not upload anything.\n\n6. Synthetic Identity Theft : 7. .Opens in new tab 8. This is a specific form of identity theft where fraudsters create a new identity by blending real and fabricated information.\n\n9.\n\n10. \" Clean '' Credit Building : 11. .Opens in new tab 12. The fraudsters may initially make small purchases and pay them off on time to establish a good credit score and build trust with the financial system.\n\n13.\n\n14. Defaulting on Larger Loans : 15. .Opens in new tab 16. Once a good credit history is established, the fraudsters will then attempt to obtain larger loans or credit lines, which they often default on, causing significant financial losses.\n\n17. This type of fraud is difficult to detect because it involves a combination of real and fake information, making it harder to trace back to a single individual.\n\n18. Other terms related to this type of fraud include : 19. Account Takeover : 20. .Opens in new tab 21. While this term refers to gaining control of an existing account, it can also be part of synthetic identity theft if the fraudulent account is created from scratch using a stolen identity.\n\n22. Payment Fraud : 23. .Opens in new tab 24. This is a broader term that encompasses any fraudulent activity involving payments, including synthetic identity theft.\n\n25. Address Fraud : This specific type of identity theft leverages the victim 's address for illegal activities. Examples include mail forwarding fraud, where mail is redirected to the fraudster, package interception after goods are ordered online with stolen credit card details, and using the address to open accounts or obtain credit in the victim 's name.\n\n26. Opening New Accounts or Making Purchases : Using the victim 's information to apply for credit cards, bank accounts, or loans, and potentially intercepting related mail.\n\n27. Other Schemes : The address can be used in various fraud schemes, such as bank account fraud, school enrollment fraud, or insurance fraud.\n\n28. Warning signs of address fraud or identity theft : 29. Receiving mail or packages not intended for you.\n\n30. Finding unfamiliar accounts or charges on your financial statements or credit report.\n\n31. Missing or tampered mail.\n\n32. Receiving debt collection notices for unknown accounts or loans.\n\n33. Unauthorized inquiries or new accounts on your credit report linked to your address.\n\n34. Lack of dedicated resources : White-collar crimes, including fraud, have historically received less attention and resources compared to violent crimes within victim advocacy and law enforcement.\n\n35. Victim vulnerability : handicap individuals, often targeted in financial fraud, who is barely home, and underreport their victimization.\n\nReasons Fraudulent Accounts Might Be Misidentified as Valid : Sophistication of Fraud Schemes : Modern fraud methods, such as synthetic identity theft, can be incredibly complex and difficult for investigators to detect.\n\nData Limitations and Inconsistencies : Lack of complete and accurate fraud data can make it hard to identify the total extent of fraudulent activity.\n\nAdministrative Errors : Processes for tracking and reporting fraud may have limitations, potentially leading to errors or delays in recognizing fraudulent accounts.\n\nConsequences for Victims : Financial Loss : Victims may face financial losses due to fraudulent transactions and damage to their credit history.\n\nEmotional and Psychological Distress : Victims often experience XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, and a sense of violation when their identity is compromised. \nDifficulties in Resolution : Correcting fraudulent accounts can be a challenging and time-consuming process.\n\nDebt Validation Requirement : The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) and the CFPB 's Debt Collection Rule require debt collectors to provide consumers with specific information about the debt, known as \" validation information ''.\n\nTimeline for Providing Validation Information : Generally, this information should be provided in a written notice either as the initial communication or within five days of the debt collector 's first contact with the consumer.\n\nConsequences of Failure to Validate : Ceasing Collection Activities : If a debt collector fails to validate a debt when requested to do so within the specified time frame, they must cease collection activities.\n\nCFPB Enforcement Actions : The CFPB brings enforcement actions against companies that violate debt validation requirements, including failure to provide timely notices and mishandling disputes.\n\nConsumer Remedies : Consumers who are not provided timely debt validation or whose disputes are mishandled may be entitled to financial relief and potential lawsuits against the debt collector.\n\n15 U.S.C. 1692g The failure of a consumer to dispute the validity of a debt under this section may not be construed by any court as an admission of liability by the consumer XXXX XXXX provided me a copy of the validation they claimed they sent on XX/XX/XXXX, which is not sufficient. Even if they allege they mailed it bills alone is not sufficient to validate the debt, which is probably why it was removed from once report. \nWhile copies of credit card billing statements can be a component of debt validation, they alone may not be sufficient to fulfill the requirements for validating a debt under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ).\n\nWhat constitutes valid debt validation?\n\nDebt validation involves a debt collector providing clear and accurate documentation to prove that you owe a specific debt and they have the legal right to collect it. According to the FDCPA and related regulations, this documentation generally includes : A copy of the original credit agreement : This could be the original credit card agreement signed by you.\n\nDocumentation showing the collector 's right to pursue the debt : If the debt has been sold, this would include records demonstrating the chain of ownership.\n\nA detailed accounting of the total amount owed : This includes the original debt amount, interest, fees, payments, and credits since a specific date ( the \" itemization date '' ).\n\nDuty to Provide CRAs with Accurate Information Prohibition on Reporting Inaccurate Information. Section 623 ( a ) of the FCRA generally prohibits a person from furnishing inaccurate information to a CRA. The standards for the prohibition differ, depending on whether the person specifies an address for receipt of notices from consumers concerning inaccurate information. If the person specifies such an address, it may not furnish information relating to a consumer to any CRA, if ( a ) the consumer notified the person, at the specified address, that the information is inaccurate, and ( b ) the information is, in fact, inaccurate.18 If the person does not specify such an address, the FCRA prohibits the person from reporting information to a CRA if the furnisher knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate.19 The statute defines reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate to mean having specific knowledge, other than solely allegations by the consumer, that would cause a reasonable person to have substantial doubts about the accuracy of the information.20 Duty to Promptly Correct and Update Information. Section 623 ( a ) of the FCRA also requires a person who regularly furnishes information to CRAs to promptly notify a CRA if the person determines the previously furnished information is not complete or accurate.21 The person must then provide corrected information and ensure it does not refurnish the incomplete or inaccurate information.\n\nDuty to Provide Notice of Dispute. If a consumer disputes the completeness or accuracy of furnished information, the furnisher must provide a notice of the dispute to the CRAs when furnishing the disputed information.22 Duty to Provide Notice of Accounts Closed Voluntarily. A person who regularly furnishes information to CRAs must notify the CRAs when a consumer voluntarily closes a credit account.23 This notice must be included in the information regularly furnished for the period in which the account is closed.\n\nDuty to Provide Dates of Delinquency. When an account is placed for collection, is charged to profit or loss, or a similar action is taken, and that delinquency is furnished to a CRA, the furnisher must notify the CRA of the date of delinquency on the account no later than 90 days after furnishing the information.24 This date is the month and year the account first becomes delinquent, not when the creditor places the account for collections, charges the account to profit or loss, or takes a similar action.25 Duty to Prevent Repollution of Consumer Reports. If a consumer submits an identity theft report to a furnisher indicating that furnished information resulted from identity theft, the furnisher must not report the information to the CRAs unless the furnisher subsequently knows or is informed by the consumer that the information is correct.26 In addition, furnishers are required to maintain reasonable procedures to respond to notifications from the CRAs relating to information that results from identify theft to prevent refurnishing this information.\n\nDuty to Provide the Customer with a Notice about Negative Information Duty to Provide a Notice to the Customer. If a financial institution that extends credit and regularly furnishes information to a nationwide CRA furnishes negative information to the CRAs about a credit extension, the financial institution must provide a clear and conspicuous written notice to the customer indicating that it furnished negative information to the CRAs.27 The term negative information means information concerning a customers delinquencies, late payments, insolvency, or any form of default.28 Timing of Notice. The financial institution must provide the notice to the customer no later than 30 days after furnishing the negative information to a CRA. After providing the notice, the financial institution is not required to send the customer additional notices if it furnishes additional negative information to the CRAs about the same transaction, credit extension, account, or customer.29 Format of Notice. The notice generally may be included on or with any notice of default, any billing statement, or any other materials provided to the customers ; however, if the notice is provided to the customer prior to furnishing the negative information to a CRA, the notice may not be included in the initial disclosures provided under Section 127 ( a ) of the Truth in Lending Act.30 Two model forms ( Model Notices of Furnishing Negative Information ) are available in Appendix B of Regulation V.31 Although use of the model forms is not required, a financial institution is deemed to comply with the requirements if it uses one of the model forms.32 Duty to Implement Reasonable Policies and Procedures Regulation V requires furnishers to establish and implement reasonable written policies and procedures regarding the accuracy and integrity of the consumer information furnished to CRAs.33 Accuracy means that the information the furnisher provides to a CRA correctly : Identifies the appropriate consumer ; Reflects the accounts terms and liability ; and Reflects the consumers performance with respect to the account.34 Integrity means the information the furnisher provides to a CRA : Is substantiated by the furnishers records at the time it is furnished ; Is in a form designed to minimize the likelihood that the information may be incorrectly reflected in a consumer report ; Includes the information in the furnishers possession regarding the credit limit, if applicable ; and Includes any other information in the furnishers possession that the Bureau has determined the absence of which would likely be materially misleading in evaluating a consumers creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living.35 Regulation V requires that the furnishers policies and procedures be appropriate to the nature, size, complexity, and scope of its activities.36 In developing the policies and procedures, a furnisher must consider the Interagency Guidelines Concerning the Accuracy and Integrity of Information Furnished to Consumer Reporting Agencies found in Appendix E of Regulation V ( Interagency Guidelines ), and incorporate those guidelines, as appropriate. Each furnisher must also review its policies and procedures periodically and update them as necessary to ensure their continued effectiveness.\n\nThe Interagency Guidelines include : Using standard data reporting formats and standard procedures for compiling and furnishing data, where feasible, such as electronic transmission of information about consumers to CRAs ; Deleting, updating, and correcting information in the furnishers records, as appropriate, to avoid furnishing inaccurate information ; Conducting reasonable investigations of disputes ; Establishing and implementing appropriate internal controls regarding the accuracy and integrity of information about consumers furnished to CRAs, such as by implementing standard procedures and verifying random samples of information provided to CRAs ; and Training staff that participates in activities related to the furnishing of information about consumers to CRAs.37 Duty to Investigate Disputes Filed Directly with the Furnisher The FCRA and Regulation V generally require a furnisher to conduct a reasonable investigation of a dispute submitted directly to a furnisher by a consumer concerning the accuracy of any information contained in a consumer report and pertaining to an account or other relationship that the furnisher has or had with the consumer ( direct dispute ) .38 Covered Disputes. A furnisher is required to investigate if the dispute relates to : The consumers liability for a credit account or other debt with the furnisher ; The terms of a credit account or other debt with the furnisher ; The consumers performance or other conduct concerning an account or other relationship with the furnisher ; or Any other information contained in a consumer report for an account or other relationship with the furnisher that bears on the consumers creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living.39 The direct dispute rule does not apply if the dispute relates to the consumers identifying information, the identity of past or present employers, or inquiries or requests for a consumer report. It also does not apply to disputes relating to information that is derived from public records, provided to a CRA by another furnisher, or related to fraud alerts or active duty alerts.40 Finally, the rule does not apply if the furnisher has a reasonable belief that the direct dispute is submitted by a credit repair organization, is prepared on behalf of the consumer by a credit repair organization, or is submitted on a form supplied to the consumer by a credit repair organization.41 Consumers Obligation to Submit a Proper Notice of Dispute. A furnisher is required to investigate the dispute only if the consumer submitted the dispute notice to one of the following addresses : An address the furnisher provided that is listed on the consumer report ; An address the furnisher clearly and conspicuously identified for submitting direct disputes that is provided to the consumer in writing or, if the consumer agrees, electronically ; or If no address is specified, any business address of the furnisher.42 Moreover, the consumers dispute notice must include : Sufficient information to identify the account or other relationship in dispute ; The specific information being disputed ; An explanation of the basis for the dispute ; and All supporting documentation reasonably required by the furnisher to substantiate the basis of the dispute.43 Furnishers Duty to Investigate. Upon receiving a consumers proper notice of dispute, the furnisher must conduct a reasonable investigation of the dispute.44 The furnisher also must review all relevant information provided by the consumer with the dispute notice.\n\nThe furnisher has 30 days from the receipt of the dispute notice ( with the possibility for a 15-day extension under certain circumstances ) to complete the investigation and report the results to the consumer.45 If the furnisher finds that the information reported was inaccurate, the furnisher must promptly notify each CRA to which it provided the inaccurate information of the determination and provide the changes necessary to make the information accurate.46 Exception for Frivolous or Irrelevant Disputes. A furnisher is not required to investigate a direct dispute if the furnisher has reasonably determined that the dispute is frivolous or irrelevant.47 Under Regulation V, a dispute is frivolous or irrelevant if the dispute notice ( 1 ) does not contain sufficient information to investigate the dispute, ( 2 ) raises a dispute about information exempted from the rule, or ( 3 ) raises a dispute that is substantially the same as a dispute previously submitted by the consumer and resolved in accordance with the regulations. If the furnisher determines that a dispute is frivolous or irrelevant, the furnisher has five business days to notify the consumer of its determination. The notice must include the reasons for the determination and identify any information required to investigate the disputed information.\n\nDuty to Investigate Disputes Filed with CRAs The FCRA requires furnishers to investigate consumer disputes filed with the CRAs about information the furnishers provided.48 More specifically, when a furnisher receives notice from a CRA that a consumer disputes the completeness or accuracy of information the furnisher provided to the CRA , the furnisher must investigate the disputed information, review all relevant information the CRA provided, and report the results of its investigation to the CRA.49 If the furnisher determines the information it provided was incomplete or inaccurate, the furnisher must notify all nationwide CRAs to which the information was furnished of its findings.50 Finally, if the furnisher determines the disputed information is inaccurate or incomplete or can not be verified, the furnisher must promptly modify or delete the information or permanently block the reporting of that information.51 The furnisher generally has 30 days from the date the consumer filed the dispute with the CRA to complete its investigation and make appropriate notifications, but the investigation period may be extended an additional 15 days in some circumstances.52 EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY ACT/REGULATION B Regulation B, which implements the ECOA, imposes certain obligations on creditors that furnish credit information to CRAs.53 In addition, Regulation B prohibits discrimination on a prohibited basis regarding any aspect of a\ncredit transaction.54 At the federal level, the Board, FDIC, OCC, and NCUA have supervisory authority for ECOA and Regulation B for depository institutions with assets of {$10.00} XXXX or less.55 For depository institutions with assets over {$10.00} XXXX, the Bureau has this authority. Also, if any of these agencies has reason to believe that the creditor engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination, then the agency must refer the matter to the U.S. Department of Justice.56 The Board has referred one matter involving discrimination on the basis of sex and marital status in credit reporting.57 In this matter, the creditor failed to provide information to CRAs about the payment history of spouses ( almost all of whom were women ) who were contractually obligated on the note.\n\nIn addition to the federal regulators, private plaintiffs have the right to file lawsuits under the ECOA.58 Violations of Regulation B can subject creditors to civil liability for actual and punitive damages in individual and class actions.59 If a furnisher fails to comply with the regulation because of an inadvertent error, there is no violation.60 The term inadvertent error means a mechanical, electronic, or clerical error that a creditor demonstrates was not intentional and occurred notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid such errors,61 but it does not include an error of legal judgment.62 Upon discovering the error, the furnisher must correct it as soon as possible.\n\nCoverage Regulation B applies to a creditor, which is broadly defined to mean a person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly participates in a credit decision, including setting the terms of the credit.63 The Official Staff Commentary to the regulation clarifies that the furnisher requirements only apply to consumer credit.64 Moreover, they apply only to creditors that opt to furnish credit information to CRAs or to other creditors ; a creditor is not required to furnish credit information on its accounts.\n\nDuties for Accounts Held or Used by Spouses Section 1002.10 of Regulation B imposes three obligations on creditors furnishing consumer credit information to the CRAs for accounts held or used by spouses.\n\nFirst, a creditor must designate accounts to reflect both spouses participation in the accounts in the following circumstances : For new accounts, when the spouse is an authorized user or is contractually liable on the account ( except as a guarantor, surety, endorser, or similar party ) ; and For existing accounts, when one of the spouses makes a written request to reflect both spouses participation on the account. In this situation, the furnisher must change the designation on the account within 90 days after receiving the written request.65 Second, when an account is designated to reflect the participation of both spouses, the creditor must furnish the information to the CRAs in a way that enables the CRAs to provide access to the information in the name of each spouse.66 Finally, if a creditor receives an inquiry about an account that reflects both spouses participating, the creditor must furnish the information in the name of the spouse for whom the information is requested.67 For example, if the inquiry concerns an account on which a husband and wife both participate, and the inquiry specifically is about the wife, the creditor must provide the information in the wifes name.\n\nProhibition on Discrimination In addition to the specific furnisher provisions, Regulation B broadly prohibits creditors from discriminating in any aspect of the credit transaction on any prohibited basis.68 The term credit transaction includes the furnishing of credit information.69 The term prohibited basis means race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, or age ( provided that the applicant has the capacity to enter into a binding contract ) ; the applicants receipt of income, in whole or part, from any public assistance program ; or the applicants exercise in good faith of a right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act or any state law upon which an exemption has been granted by the [ Bureau ] .70 This general rule covers, for example, the administration of accounts and the treatment of delinquent or slow accounts.71 CONCLUSION Credit reports play an important role for consumers and creditors. Specific provisions of the CARES Act, the FCRA, Regulation V, the ECOA, and Regulation B are designed to ensure the fairness and accuracy of these reports. Financial institutions that furnish information to the CRAs should have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure that they are complying with these requirements, including procedures to periodically test systems to verify compliance. Compliance with the credit reporting laws can promote fair and efficient access to credit, benefiting consumers and creditors alike. Specific questions should be addressed to your primary regulator.\n\nENDNOTES 1 Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., implemented in part by Regulation V, 12 C.F.R. Part 1022. Most of the furnisher requirements discussed in this article under Section 623 of the FCRA ( 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ) do not have implementing regulations, so furnishers must focus on the statutory requirements.\n\n2 Equal Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1691 et seq., implemented by Regulation B, 12 C.F.R. Part 1002. In addition, under the ECOA, Regulation B ( 12 C.F.R. 1002.9 ), and the FCRA ( 15 U.S.C. 1681m ), consumers and businesses applying for credit must be provided notice of the reasons a creditor took adverse action on the application or on an existing credit account in certain circumstances.\n\n3 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ( CARES ) Act, Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 ( March 27, 2020 ).\n\n4 Section 4021 of the CARES Act amended Section 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) of the FCRA ( 15 U.S.C. 1681s2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ).\n\n5 Kenneth Benton and Casey McHugh, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia , Furnishers Compliance Obligations for Consumer Credit Information under the FCRA and ECOA, Consumer Compliance Outlook ( Second Quarter 2012 ).\n\n6 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s ( b ), 1681s-2 ( d ).\n\n7 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s ( c ), 1681s-2 ( d ).\n\n8 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( c ).\n\n9 See 15 U.S.C. 1681a ( b ).\n\n10 See 15 U.S.C. 1681a ( c ).\n\n11 See 15 U.S.C. 1681a ( f ).\n\n12 See 12 C.F.R. 1022.41 ( c ). An entity is not a furnisher when it : ( 1 ) provides information to a consumer reporting agency solely to obtain a consumer report in accordance with Sections 604 ( a ) and ( f ) of the FCRA ; ( 2 ) is acting as a consumer reporting agency as defined in Section 603 ( f ) of the FCRA ; ( 3 ) is a consumer to whom the furnished information pertains; or ( 4 ) is a neighbor, friend, or associate of the consumer, or another individual with whom the consumer is acquainted or who may have knowledge about the consumer, and who provides information about the consumers character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living in response to a specific request from a consumer reporting agency.\n\n13 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( F ), as added by Section 4021 of the CARES Act.\n\n14 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( F ) ( i ) ( I ).\n\n15 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( F ) ( i ) ( II ). Under the National Emergencies Act, an emergency declaration will automatically terminate on the one-year anniversary of the declaration if the President does not extend it during the 90-day period before the anniversary. 50 U.S.C. 1622 ( d ). An emergency declaration can also be terminated by a joint resolution of Congress enacted into law or by a Presidential proclamation. 50 U.S.C. 1622 ( a ).\n\n16 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( F ) ( iii ).\n\n17 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( F ) ( ii ).\n\n18 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( B ). FCRA does not require a person to specify an address for receipt of notices from consumers concerning inaccurate information. 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( C ).\n\n19 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ).\n\n20 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( D ).\n\n21 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B ).\n\n22 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 3 ).\n\n23 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 4 ).\n\n24 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 5 ).\n\n25 See 15 U.S.C. 1681c ( a ).\n\n26 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 6 ).\n\n27 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ).\n\n28 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( G ) ( i ).\n\n29 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( A ) - ( B ).\n\n30 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( B ) ( ii ) and ( C ) ( i ).\n\n31 See 12 C.F.R. Part 1022, Appendix B Model Notices of Furnishing Negative Information.\n\n32 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( D ).\n\n33 See 12 C.F.R. 1022.42. The FCRA requires the Bureau to establish and maintain guidelines for furnishers regarding the accuracy","date_sent_to_company":"2025-08-08T15:56:18.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"30058","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"14284555","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"EQUIFAX, INC.","date_received":"2025-06-25T21:49:56.000Z","state":"GA","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Information belongs to someone else"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["This is a specific form of identity theft where fraudsters create a new identity by blending real and fabricated information.\n\n9.\n\n10. \" Clean '' Credit Building : 11. .<em>Opens</em> in new tab 12. The fraudsters may initially make <em>small</em> purchases and pay them off on time to establish a good credit score and build trust with the financial system.\n\n13.\n\n14. Defaulting on Larger <em>Loans</em> : 15. .<em>Opens</em> in new tab 16."],"company":["<em>EQUIFAX</em>, INC."]},"sort":[5.00086,"14284555"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"14284554","_score":5.00086,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Original Account Number is unknown DOB is XX/XX/XXXX, and the last 4 SSN is XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Litonia, GA XXXX Equifax : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, GA XXXX Experian : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, XXXX, TX XXXX TransUnion : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, XXXX, PA XXXX Dear CFPB, FTC, and Credit Bureaus, I am writing to file a formal complaint against all three credit reporting agencies regarding identity theft. In XX/XX/XXXX, after discovering my identity had been stolen, I contacted all three credit reporting agencies, the original creditors, and the collection agencies. I also placed a freeze on my credit accounts and filed a police report. \n\nWith nearly 30 years of experience as a private investigator, primarily tracking fraud, I recognize the type of theft committed against me as synthetic identity theft or synthetic fraud. This form of identity theft involves fraudsters making minimum payments to gain more credit before eventually defaulting.\n\nI was severely injured with a XXXX XXXX, XXXX, ribs, and a XXXX XXXX XXXX, which resulted in two years of hospitalization for therapy, followed by an additional year due to XXXX, further surgeries, and therapy. Currently, I am still hospitalized with no set release date, which has significantly hindered my ability to communicate with the credit reporting agencies, as they only correspond by mail. Although I offered my medical information to them, they declined due to HIPAA. However, to prove my whereabouts for the past three years and resolve this nightmare, I am willing to provide your agency with access to my medical file. \n\nFurthermore, I can provide proof that my mail was compromised, including a letter from my bank stating that unknown individuals attempted to access my account from my cell phone number. The bank placed them on hold when they could not verify my password. They tried to reach me, but I was in the XXXX  at the time. My account was subsequently put on hold until I could speak with the bank and visit in person with my identification. My local branch, where I am well-known, can confirm the attempted identity theft on my account. My account was also linked for automatic payments on these fraudulent accounts, leading me to believe the two ladies hired to assist me for medical reasons had access to my address for the purpose of entering and cleaning. My home is equipped with 18 cameras that record 24/7, but footage must be backed up within seven days to avoid being recorded over.\n\n1. The account for XXXX XXXX XXXX has two different amounts listed on each report. ( XXXX ) They failed to validate the debt as requested in XXXX, and the original creditor failed to validate the dispute and the debt 2. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX failed to validate the debt for the XXXX XXXX, and the original creditor failed as well. XXXX  was removed from Trans Union but remains on the other agencies, with a threat to add it back onto TransUnion by the collection agency 3. XXXX XXXX and XXXX were opened by the same company. The collection agency failed to respond, and the original creditor failed to properly respond timely manner and based their findings on personal beliefs. \n4. My account with XXXX and XXXX  XXXX XXXX is the only account that belongs to me. XXXX  is not accurate for the three late payments. I spoke with them several times and have the recording with them stating it will be updated as pays as agree. My bank stopped the automatic payments after my account was flagged by the fraud department. It was money that ahd accumulated on XXXX ( for my XXXX XXXX XXXX ) that would have cleared the ayments. I was told not to worry because they cover me for ninety days.\n\n5. I am being penalized by the bureaus and they are accepting whatever creditors and collection agencies say with no valid information. None of the creditors original creditors or the collection agencies had provided me with validation of the debts or the 623 dispute and validation pursuant to the FCRA. I am also locked out of all my accounts oline and can not upload anything.\n\n6. Synthetic Identity Theft : 7. .Opens in new tab 8. This is a specific form of identity theft where fraudsters create a new identity by blending real and fabricated information.\n\n9.\n\n10. \" Clean '' Credit Building : 11. .Opens in new tab 12. The fraudsters may initially make small purchases and pay them off on time to establish a good credit score and build trust with the financial system.\n\n13.\n\n14. Defaulting on Larger Loans : 15. .Opens in new tab 16. Once a good credit history is established, the fraudsters will then attempt to obtain larger loans or credit lines, which they often default on, causing significant financial losses.\n\n17. This type of fraud is difficult to detect because it involves a combination of real and fake information, making it harder to trace back to a single individual.\n\n18. Other terms related to this type of fraud include : 19. Account Takeover : 20. .Opens in new tab 21. While this term refers to gaining control of an existing account, it can also be part of synthetic identity theft if the fraudulent account is created from scratch using a stolen identity.\n\n22. Payment Fraud : 23. .Opens in new tab 24. This is a broader term that encompasses any fraudulent activity involving payments, including synthetic identity theft.\n\n25. Address Fraud : This specific type of identity theft leverages the victim 's address for illegal activities. Examples include mail forwarding fraud, where mail is redirected to the fraudster, package interception after goods are ordered online with stolen credit card details, and using the address to open accounts or obtain credit in the victim 's name.\n\n26. Opening New Accounts or Making Purchases : Using the victim 's information to apply for credit cards, bank accounts, or loans, and potentially intercepting related mail.\n\n27. Other Schemes : The address can be used in various fraud schemes, such as bank account fraud, school enrollment fraud, or insurance fraud.\n\n28. Warning signs of address fraud or identity theft : 29. Receiving mail or packages not intended for you.\n\n30. Finding unfamiliar accounts or charges on your financial statements or credit report.\n\n31. Missing or tampered mail.\n\n32. Receiving debt collection notices for unknown accounts or loans.\n\n33. Unauthorized inquiries or new accounts on your credit report linked to your address.\n\n34. Lack of dedicated resources : White-collar crimes, including fraud, have historically received less attention and resources compared to violent crimes within victim advocacy and law enforcement.\n\n35. Victim vulnerability : handicap individuals, often targeted in financial fraud, who is barely home, and underreport their victimization.\n\nReasons Fraudulent Accounts Might Be Misidentified as Valid : Sophistication of Fraud Schemes : Modern fraud methods, such as synthetic identity theft, can be incredibly complex and difficult for investigators to detect.\n\nData Limitations and Inconsistencies : Lack of complete and accurate fraud data can make it hard to identify the total extent of fraudulent activity.\n\nAdministrative Errors : Processes for tracking and reporting fraud may have limitations, potentially leading to errors or delays in recognizing fraudulent accounts.\n\nConsequences for Victims : Financial Loss : Victims may face financial losses due to fraudulent transactions and damage to their credit history.\n\nEmotional and Psychological Distress : Victims often experience XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, and a sense of violation when their identity is compromised. \nDifficulties in Resolution : Correcting fraudulent accounts can be a challenging and time-consuming process.\n\nDebt Validation Requirement : The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) and the CFPB 's Debt Collection Rule require debt collectors to provide consumers with specific information about the debt, known as \" validation information ''.\n\nTimeline for Providing Validation Information : Generally, this information should be provided in a written notice either as the initial communication or within five days of the debt collector 's first contact with the consumer.\n\nConsequences of Failure to Validate : Ceasing Collection Activities : If a debt collector fails to validate a debt when requested to do so within the specified time frame, they must cease collection activities.\n\nCFPB Enforcement Actions : The CFPB brings enforcement actions against companies that violate debt validation requirements, including failure to provide timely notices and mishandling disputes.\n\nConsumer Remedies : Consumers who are not provided timely debt validation or whose disputes are mishandled may be entitled to financial relief and potential lawsuits against the debt collector.\n\n15 U.S.C. 1692g The failure of a consumer to dispute the validity of a debt under this section may not be construed by any court as an admission of liability by the consumer XXXX XXXX provided me a copy of the validation they claimed they sent on XX/XX/XXXX, which is not sufficient. Even if they allege they mailed it bills alone is not sufficient to validate the debt, which is probably why it was removed from once report. \nWhile copies of credit card billing statements can be a component of debt validation, they alone may not be sufficient to fulfill the requirements for validating a debt under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ).\n\nWhat constitutes valid debt validation?\n\nDebt validation involves a debt collector providing clear and accurate documentation to prove that you owe a specific debt and they have the legal right to collect it. According to the FDCPA and related regulations, this documentation generally includes : A copy of the original credit agreement : This could be the original credit card agreement signed by you.\n\nDocumentation showing the collector 's right to pursue the debt : If the debt has been sold, this would include records demonstrating the chain of ownership.\n\nA detailed accounting of the total amount owed : This includes the original debt amount, interest, fees, payments, and credits since a specific date ( the \" itemization date '' ).\n\nDuty to Provide CRAs with Accurate Information Prohibition on Reporting Inaccurate Information. Section 623 ( a ) of the FCRA generally prohibits a person from furnishing inaccurate information to a CRA. The standards for the prohibition differ, depending on whether the person specifies an address for receipt of notices from consumers concerning inaccurate information. If the person specifies such an address, it may not furnish information relating to a consumer to any CRA, if ( a ) the consumer notified the person, at the specified address, that the information is inaccurate, and ( b ) the information is, in fact, inaccurate.18 If the person does not specify such an address, the FCRA prohibits the person from reporting information to a CRA if the furnisher knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate.19 The statute defines reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate to mean having specific knowledge, other than solely allegations by the consumer, that would cause a reasonable person to have substantial doubts about the accuracy of the information.20 Duty to Promptly Correct and Update Information. Section 623 ( a ) of the FCRA also requires a person who regularly furnishes information to CRAs to promptly notify a CRA if the person determines the previously furnished information is not complete or accurate.21 The person must then provide corrected information and ensure it does not refurnish the incomplete or inaccurate information.\n\nDuty to Provide Notice of Dispute. If a consumer disputes the completeness or accuracy of furnished information, the furnisher must provide a notice of the dispute to the CRAs when furnishing the disputed information.22 Duty to Provide Notice of Accounts Closed Voluntarily. A person who regularly furnishes information to CRAs must notify the CRAs when a consumer voluntarily closes a credit account.23 This notice must be included in the information regularly furnished for the period in which the account is closed.\n\nDuty to Provide Dates of Delinquency. When an account is placed for collection, is charged to profit or loss, or a similar action is taken, and that delinquency is furnished to a CRA, the furnisher must notify the CRA of the date of delinquency on the account no later than 90 days after furnishing the information.24 This date is the month and year the account first becomes delinquent, not when the creditor places the account for collections, charges the account to profit or loss, or takes a similar action.25 Duty to Prevent Repollution of Consumer Reports. If a consumer submits an identity theft report to a furnisher indicating that furnished information resulted from identity theft, the furnisher must not report the information to the CRAs unless the furnisher subsequently knows or is informed by the consumer that the information is correct.26 In addition, furnishers are required to maintain reasonable procedures to respond to notifications from the CRAs relating to information that results from identify theft to prevent refurnishing this information.\n\nDuty to Provide the Customer with a Notice about Negative Information Duty to Provide a Notice to the Customer. If a financial institution that extends credit and regularly furnishes information to a nationwide CRA furnishes negative information to the CRAs about a credit extension, the financial institution must provide a clear and conspicuous written notice to the customer indicating that it furnished negative information to the CRAs.27 The term negative information means information concerning a customers delinquencies, late payments, insolvency, or any form of default.28 Timing of Notice. The financial institution must provide the notice to the customer no later than 30 days after furnishing the negative information to a CRA. After providing the notice, the financial institution is not required to send the customer additional notices if it furnishes additional negative information to the CRAs about the same transaction, credit extension, account, or customer.29 Format of Notice. The notice generally may be included on or with any notice of default, any billing statement, or any other materials provided to the customers ; however, if the notice is provided to the customer prior to furnishing the negative information to a CRA, the notice may not be included in the initial disclosures provided under Section 127 ( a ) of the Truth in Lending Act.30 Two model forms ( Model Notices of Furnishing Negative Information ) are available in Appendix B of Regulation V.31 Although use of the model forms is not required, a financial institution is deemed to comply with the requirements if it uses one of the model forms.32 Duty to Implement Reasonable Policies and Procedures Regulation V requires furnishers to establish and implement reasonable written policies and procedures regarding the accuracy and integrity of the consumer information furnished to CRAs.33 Accuracy means that the information the furnisher provides to a CRA correctly : Identifies the appropriate consumer ; Reflects the accounts terms and liability ; and Reflects the consumers performance with respect to the account.34 Integrity means the information the furnisher provides to a CRA : Is substantiated by the furnishers records at the time it is furnished ; Is in a form designed to minimize the likelihood that the information may be incorrectly reflected in a consumer report ; Includes the information in the furnishers possession regarding the credit limit, if applicable ; and Includes any other information in the furnishers possession that the Bureau has determined the absence of which would likely be materially misleading in evaluating a consumers creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living.35 Regulation V requires that the furnishers policies and procedures be appropriate to the nature, size, complexity, and scope of its activities.36 In developing the policies and procedures, a furnisher must consider the Interagency Guidelines Concerning the Accuracy and Integrity of Information Furnished to Consumer Reporting Agencies found in Appendix E of Regulation V ( Interagency Guidelines ), and incorporate those guidelines, as appropriate. Each furnisher must also review its policies and procedures periodically and update them as necessary to ensure their continued effectiveness.\n\nThe Interagency Guidelines include : Using standard data reporting formats and standard procedures for compiling and furnishing data, where feasible, such as electronic transmission of information about consumers to CRAs ; Deleting, updating, and correcting information in the furnishers records, as appropriate, to avoid furnishing inaccurate information ; Conducting reasonable investigations of disputes ; Establishing and implementing appropriate internal controls regarding the accuracy and integrity of information about consumers furnished to CRAs, such as by implementing standard procedures and verifying random samples of information provided to CRAs ; and Training staff that participates in activities related to the furnishing of information about consumers to CRAs.37 Duty to Investigate Disputes Filed Directly with the Furnisher The FCRA and Regulation V generally require a furnisher to conduct a reasonable investigation of a dispute submitted directly to a furnisher by a consumer concerning the accuracy of any information contained in a consumer report and pertaining to an account or other relationship that the furnisher has or had with the consumer ( direct dispute ) .38 Covered Disputes. A furnisher is required to investigate if the dispute relates to : The consumers liability for a credit account or other debt with the furnisher ; The terms of a credit account or other debt with the furnisher ; The consumers performance or other conduct concerning an account or other relationship with the furnisher ; or Any other information contained in a consumer report for an account or other relationship with the furnisher that bears on the consumers creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living.39 The direct dispute rule does not apply if the dispute relates to the consumers identifying information, the identity of past or present employers, or inquiries or requests for a consumer report. It also does not apply to disputes relating to information that is derived from public records, provided to a CRA by another furnisher, or related to fraud alerts or active duty alerts.40 Finally, the rule does not apply if the furnisher has a reasonable belief that the direct dispute is submitted by a credit repair organization, is prepared on behalf of the consumer by a credit repair organization, or is submitted on a form supplied to the consumer by a credit repair organization.41 Consumers Obligation to Submit a Proper Notice of Dispute. A furnisher is required to investigate the dispute only if the consumer submitted the dispute notice to one of the following addresses : An address the furnisher provided that is listed on the consumer report ; An address the furnisher clearly and conspicuously identified for submitting direct disputes that is provided to the consumer in writing or, if the consumer agrees, electronically ; or If no address is specified, any business address of the furnisher.42 Moreover, the consumers dispute notice must include : Sufficient information to identify the account or other relationship in dispute ; The specific information being disputed ; An explanation of the basis for the dispute ; and All supporting documentation reasonably required by the furnisher to substantiate the basis of the dispute.43 Furnishers Duty to Investigate. Upon receiving a consumers proper notice of dispute, the furnisher must conduct a reasonable investigation of the dispute.44 The furnisher also must review all relevant information provided by the consumer with the dispute notice.\n\nThe furnisher has 30 days from the receipt of the dispute notice ( with the possibility for a 15-day extension under certain circumstances ) to complete the investigation and report the results to the consumer.45 If the furnisher finds that the information reported was inaccurate, the furnisher must promptly notify each CRA to which it provided the inaccurate information of the determination and provide the changes necessary to make the information accurate.46 Exception for Frivolous or Irrelevant Disputes. A furnisher is not required to investigate a direct dispute if the furnisher has reasonably determined that the dispute is frivolous or irrelevant.47 Under Regulation V, a dispute is frivolous or irrelevant if the dispute notice ( 1 ) does not contain sufficient information to investigate the dispute, ( 2 ) raises a dispute about information exempted from the rule, or ( 3 ) raises a dispute that is substantially the same as a dispute previously submitted by the consumer and resolved in accordance with the regulations. If the furnisher determines that a dispute is frivolous or irrelevant, the furnisher has five business days to notify the consumer of its determination. The notice must include the reasons for the determination and identify any information required to investigate the disputed information.\n\nDuty to Investigate Disputes Filed with CRAs The FCRA requires furnishers to investigate consumer disputes filed with the CRAs about information the furnishers provided.48 More specifically, when a furnisher receives notice from a CRA that a consumer disputes the completeness or accuracy of information the furnisher provided to the CRA , the furnisher must investigate the disputed information, review all relevant information the CRA provided, and report the results of its investigation to the CRA.49 If the furnisher determines the information it provided was incomplete or inaccurate, the furnisher must notify all nationwide CRAs to which the information was furnished of its findings.50 Finally, if the furnisher determines the disputed information is inaccurate or incomplete or can not be verified, the furnisher must promptly modify or delete the information or permanently block the reporting of that information.51 The furnisher generally has 30 days from the date the consumer filed the dispute with the CRA to complete its investigation and make appropriate notifications, but the investigation period may be extended an additional 15 days in some circumstances.52 EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY ACT/REGULATION B Regulation B, which implements the ECOA, imposes certain obligations on creditors that furnish credit information to CRAs.53 In addition, Regulation B prohibits discrimination on a prohibited basis regarding any aspect of a\ncredit transaction.54 At the federal level, the Board, FDIC, OCC, and NCUA have supervisory authority for ECOA and Regulation B for depository institutions with assets of {$10.00} XXXX or less.55 For depository institutions with assets over {$10.00} XXXX, the Bureau has this authority. Also, if any of these agencies has reason to believe that the creditor engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination, then the agency must refer the matter to the U.S. Department of Justice.56 The Board has referred one matter involving discrimination on the basis of sex and marital status in credit reporting.57 In this matter, the creditor failed to provide information to CRAs about the payment history of spouses ( almost all of whom were women ) who were contractually obligated on the note.\n\nIn addition to the federal regulators, private plaintiffs have the right to file lawsuits under the ECOA.58 Violations of Regulation B can subject creditors to civil liability for actual and punitive damages in individual and class actions.59 If a furnisher fails to comply with the regulation because of an inadvertent error, there is no violation.60 The term inadvertent error means a mechanical, electronic, or clerical error that a creditor demonstrates was not intentional and occurred notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid such errors,61 but it does not include an error of legal judgment.62 Upon discovering the error, the furnisher must correct it as soon as possible.\n\nCoverage Regulation B applies to a creditor, which is broadly defined to mean a person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly participates in a credit decision, including setting the terms of the credit.63 The Official Staff Commentary to the regulation clarifies that the furnisher requirements only apply to consumer credit.64 Moreover, they apply only to creditors that opt to furnish credit information to CRAs or to other creditors ; a creditor is not required to furnish credit information on its accounts.\n\nDuties for Accounts Held or Used by Spouses Section 1002.10 of Regulation B imposes three obligations on creditors furnishing consumer credit information to the CRAs for accounts held or used by spouses.\n\nFirst, a creditor must designate accounts to reflect both spouses participation in the accounts in the following circumstances : For new accounts, when the spouse is an authorized user or is contractually liable on the account ( except as a guarantor, surety, endorser, or similar party ) ; and For existing accounts, when one of the spouses makes a written request to reflect both spouses participation on the account. In this situation, the furnisher must change the designation on the account within 90 days after receiving the written request.65 Second, when an account is designated to reflect the participation of both spouses, the creditor must furnish the information to the CRAs in a way that enables the CRAs to provide access to the information in the name of each spouse.66 Finally, if a creditor receives an inquiry about an account that reflects both spouses participating, the creditor must furnish the information in the name of the spouse for whom the information is requested.67 For example, if the inquiry concerns an account on which a husband and wife both participate, and the inquiry specifically is about the wife, the creditor must provide the information in the wifes name.\n\nProhibition on Discrimination In addition to the specific furnisher provisions, Regulation B broadly prohibits creditors from discriminating in any aspect of the credit transaction on any prohibited basis.68 The term credit transaction includes the furnishing of credit information.69 The term prohibited basis means race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, or age ( provided that the applicant has the capacity to enter into a binding contract ) ; the applicants receipt of income, in whole or part, from any public assistance program ; or the applicants exercise in good faith of a right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act or any state law upon which an exemption has been granted by the [ Bureau ] .70 This general rule covers, for example, the administration of accounts and the treatment of delinquent or slow accounts.71 CONCLUSION Credit reports play an important role for consumers and creditors. Specific provisions of the CARES Act, the FCRA, Regulation V, the ECOA, and Regulation B are designed to ensure the fairness and accuracy of these reports. Financial institutions that furnish information to the CRAs should have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure that they are complying with these requirements, including procedures to periodically test systems to verify compliance. Compliance with the credit reporting laws can promote fair and efficient access to credit, benefiting consumers and creditors alike. Specific questions should be addressed to your primary regulator.\n\nENDNOTES 1 Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., implemented in part by Regulation V, 12 C.F.R. Part 1022. Most of the furnisher requirements discussed in this article under Section 623 of the FCRA ( 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ) do not have implementing regulations, so furnishers must focus on the statutory requirements.\n\n2 Equal Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1691 et seq., implemented by Regulation B, 12 C.F.R. Part 1002. In addition, under the ECOA, Regulation B ( 12 C.F.R. 1002.9 ), and the FCRA ( 15 U.S.C. 1681m ), consumers and businesses applying for credit must be provided notice of the reasons a creditor took adverse action on the application or on an existing credit account in certain circumstances.\n\n3 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ( CARES ) Act, Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 ( March 27, 2020 ).\n\n4 Section 4021 of the CARES Act amended Section 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) of the FCRA ( 15 U.S.C. 1681s2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ).\n\n5 Kenneth Benton and Casey McHugh, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia , Furnishers Compliance Obligations for Consumer Credit Information under the FCRA and ECOA, Consumer Compliance Outlook ( Second Quarter 2012 ).\n\n6 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s ( b ), 1681s-2 ( d ).\n\n7 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s ( c ), 1681s-2 ( d ).\n\n8 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( c ).\n\n9 See 15 U.S.C. 1681a ( b ).\n\n10 See 15 U.S.C. 1681a ( c ).\n\n11 See 15 U.S.C. 1681a ( f ).\n\n12 See 12 C.F.R. 1022.41 ( c ). An entity is not a furnisher when it : ( 1 ) provides information to a consumer reporting agency solely to obtain a consumer report in accordance with Sections 604 ( a ) and ( f ) of the FCRA ; ( 2 ) is acting as a consumer reporting agency as defined in Section 603 ( f ) of the FCRA ; ( 3 ) is a consumer to whom the furnished information pertains; or ( 4 ) is a neighbor, friend, or associate of the consumer, or another individual with whom the consumer is acquainted or who may have knowledge about the consumer, and who provides information about the consumers character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living in response to a specific request from a consumer reporting agency.\n\n13 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( F ), as added by Section 4021 of the CARES Act.\n\n14 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( F ) ( i ) ( I ).\n\n15 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( F ) ( i ) ( II ). Under the National Emergencies Act, an emergency declaration will automatically terminate on the one-year anniversary of the declaration if the President does not extend it during the 90-day period before the anniversary. 50 U.S.C. 1622 ( d ). An emergency declaration can also be terminated by a joint resolution of Congress enacted into law or by a Presidential proclamation. 50 U.S.C. 1622 ( a ).\n\n16 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( F ) ( iii ).\n\n17 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( F ) ( ii ).\n\n18 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( B ). FCRA does not require a person to specify an address for receipt of notices from consumers concerning inaccurate information. 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( C ).\n\n19 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ).\n\n20 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( D ).\n\n21 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B ).\n\n22 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 3 ).\n\n23 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 4 ).\n\n24 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 5 ).\n\n25 See 15 U.S.C. 1681c ( a ).\n\n26 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 6 ).\n\n27 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ).\n\n28 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( G ) ( i ).\n\n29 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( A ) - ( B ).\n\n30 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( B ) ( ii ) and ( C ) ( i ).\n\n31 See 12 C.F.R. Part 1022, Appendix B Model Notices of Furnishing Negative Information.\n\n32 See 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( D ).\n\n33 See 12 C.F.R. 1022.42. The FCRA requires the Bureau to establish and maintain guidelines for furnishers regarding the accuracy","date_sent_to_company":"2025-08-08T16:02:56.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"30058","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"14284554","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.","date_received":"2025-06-25T21:49:56.000Z","state":"GA","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Information belongs to someone else"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["This is a specific form of identity theft where fraudsters create a new identity by blending real and fabricated information.\n\n9.\n\n10. \" Clean '' Credit Building : 11. .<em>Opens</em> in new tab 12. The fraudsters may initially make <em>small</em> purchases and pay them off on time to establish a good credit score and build trust with the financial system.\n\n13.\n\n14. Defaulting on Larger <em>Loans</em> : 15. .<em>Opens</em> in new tab 16."]},"sort":[5.00086,"14284554"]}]},"aggregations":{"has_narrative":{"meta":{},"doc_count":8,"has_narrative":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":1,"key_as_string":"true","doc_count":8}]}},"product":{"doc_count":8,"product":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","doc_count":7,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit reporting","doc_count":7}]}},{"key":"Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports","doc_count":1,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit reporting","doc_count":1}]}}]}},"issue":{"doc_count":8,"issue":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Incorrect information on your report","doc_count":5,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Information belongs to someone else","doc_count":5}]}},{"key":"Improper use of your report","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Reporting company used your report improperly","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Their investigation did not fix an error on your report","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Problem with fraud alerts or security freezes","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}}]}},"timely":{"doc_count":8,"timely":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Yes","doc_count":8}]}},"company_response":{"doc_count":8,"company_response":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Closed with explanation","doc_count":4},{"key":"Closed with non-monetary relief","doc_count":4}]}},"submitted_via":{"doc_count":8,"submitted_via":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Web","doc_count":8}]}},"company":{"doc_count":8,"company":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"EQUIFAX, INC.","doc_count":4},{"key":"TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.","doc_count":2},{"key":"CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION","doc_count":1},{"key":"Experian Information Solutions Inc.","doc_count":1}]}},"state":{"doc_count":8,"state":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"GA","doc_count":3},{"key":"IL","doc_count":3},{"key":"NY","doc_count":1},{"key":"TX","doc_count":1}]}},"company_public_response":{"doc_count":8,"company_public_response":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","doc_count":2}]}},"tags":{"doc_count":8,"tags":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}}},"_meta":{"license":"CC0","last_updated":"2026-07-14T12:00:00-05:00","last_indexed":"2026-07-14T12:00:00-05:00","total_record_count":16441818,"is_data_stale":false,"has_data_issue":false,"break_points":{}}}