{"took":101,"timed_out":false,"_shards":{"total":5,"successful":5,"skipped":0,"failed":0},"hits":{"total":{"value":341,"relation":"eq"},"max_score":null,"hits":[{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"16571123","_score":15.78795,"_source":{"product":"Payday loan, title loan, personal loan, or advance loan","complaint_what_happened":"I opened a line of credit with Mobiloans , LLC and made a payment of {$250.00} on XX/XX/year>. Ive repeatedly requested hardship assistance due to financial strain and asked for written details about eligibility and terms. Mobiloans has refused to provide any information in writing and insists that I must call their support line to discuss options. Ive explained that I prefer email communication for documentation purposes, but they continue to deny assistance unless I speak by phone. \n\nWhy its a problem : Mobiloans is refusing to provide transparency or written documentation regarding hardship assistance. This prevents me from making informed decisions and creates a barrier to fair resolution. Their refusal to communicate in writing raises concerns about accountability and compliance with fair lending practices. \n\nWhat I want : Im requesting that Mobiloans provide written details about any available hardship assistance, including eligibility criteria, terms, and how it affects my balance and finance charges. I also want assurance that my payment has been properly applied and that my account will not be penalized for requesting assistance via email.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-10-14T15:53:01.000Z","issue":"Struggling to pay your loan","sub_product":"Payday loan","zip_code":"99208","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"16571123","timely":"No","company_response":"Untimely response","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Mobiloans, LLC","date_received":"2025-10-14T15:43:05.000Z","state":"WA","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":null},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I opened a <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em> with Mobiloans , LLC and made a payment of {$250.00} on XX/XX/year>. Ive repeatedly requested hardship assistance due to financial strain and asked for written details about eligibility and <em>terms</em>. Mobiloans has refused to provide any information in writing and insists that I must call their support <em>line</em> to discuss options. Ive explained that I prefer email communication for documentation purposes, but they continue to deny assistance unless I speak by phone."]},"sort":[15.78795,"16571123"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"11050826","_score":15.560984,"_source":{"product":"Payday loan, title loan, personal loan, or advance loan","complaint_what_happened":"I am filing a complaint regarding Capital Ones denial of my recent request for a credit line increase. Under consumer protection laws, specifically 15 U.S.C. 1611 and 15 U.S.C. 1602, I believe my rights as a consumer may have been violated. Capital One failed to provide a clear and valid explanation for the denial, raising concerns about whether the decision adhered to the legal requirements for transparency and fairness outlined in these statutes. I request the CFPB to investigate this matter to ensure compliance with applicable consumer laws and to provide me with clarity regarding my credit line increase denial. 1. 15 U.S.C. 1611 primarily addresses criminal liabilities for willful and knowing violations of the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ). It is generally not directly relevant to routine consumer complaints like credit line increases unless there was intentional fraud or misrepresentation by the creditor. \n2. 15 U.S.C. 1602 provides definitions for terms used in the Truth in Lending Act. It doesnt establish substantive rights but defines key terms that may apply to your situation. \n\nFor a credit line increase denial, your complaint might be better supported by focusing on regulations under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( ECOA ), which requires creditors to provide specific reasons for adverse actions, such as denials, and ensures decisions are not discriminatory ( see 15 U.S.C. 1691 ( d ) ). If Capital One failed to provide adequate reasons for their decision, you could reference this statute instead.","date_sent_to_company":"2024-12-06T14:58:43.000Z","issue":"Getting a line of credit","sub_product":"Personal line of credit","zip_code":"688XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"11050826","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION","date_received":"2024-12-06T14:33:56.000Z","state":"NE","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":null},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["It is generally not directly relevant to routine consumer complaints like <em>credit</em> <em>line</em> increases unless there was intentional fraud or misrepresentation by the creditor. \n2. 15 U.S.C. 1602 provides definitions for <em>terms</em> used in the Truth in Lending Act. It doesnt establish substantive rights but defines key <em>terms</em> that may apply to your situation."],"issue":["Getting a <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em>"],"sub_product":["Personal <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em>"]},"sort":[15.560984,"11050826"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"1765757","_score":14.8120165,"_source":{"product":"Mortgage","complaint_what_happened":"TD Banknorth holds my Home Equity Line of Credit account number XXXX. One month ago the sent a billing to me with a payment that is 4 times what the typical payment has been. This is a adjustable rate loan with an APR of 2.74 according to their online statements and paper statements. I have sent XXXX secured messages to them on the website asking for documentation as to how the payment increased 4 times. I have recently received a letter threatening foreclosure and they are charging me late fees and reporting my loan as delinquent. I have paid as agreed and have the documentation of such. I called today to speak with their collection department and the individual gave me a multitude of wrong answers. There are no changes in my statements that would reflect anything other than the terms I have had for 10 years. If they have made changes to my Home Equity loan terms there have been no compliance documents sent at all. They are not able to provide me with any reasons why the payment has changed 4 times. They are reporting me as delinquent and sending me letters regarding foreclosure and saving my home as I am current and have been at all times.","date_sent_to_company":"2016-02-03T21:30:18.000Z","issue":"Loan servicing, payments, escrow account","sub_product":"Home equity loan or line of credit","zip_code":"38017","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"1765757","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"TD BANK US HOLDING COMPANY","date_received":"2016-01-30T16:07:27.000Z","state":"TN","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":null},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["There are no changes in my statements that would reflect anything other than the <em>terms</em> I have had for 10 years. If they have made changes to my Home Equity loan <em>terms</em> there have <em>been</em> no <em>compliance</em> documents sent at all. They are not able to provide me with any reasons why the payment has changed 4 times. They are reporting me as delinquent and sending me letters regarding foreclosure and saving my home as I am current and have <em>been</em> at all times."],"sub_product":["Home equity loan or <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em>"]},"sort":[14.8120165,"1765757"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"5731084","_score":14.739602,"_source":{"product":"Credit card or prepaid card","complaint_what_happened":"I applied for a XXXX XXXX card on Sunday, XX/XX/2022. The card is issued by Synchrony bank. When I went through the application process, I requested a credit limit of XXXX or XXXX, I honestly dont remember which it was. \n\nSadly, synchrony bank did not approve the credit extended but they opened an account with a {$2500.00} credit line. \n\nI saved the terms and conditions shared during the application process and I have not been able to locate a section that indicates I consent to the opening of an account that has less favorable terms than I applied for. It is my understanding that if an applicant os extended credit terms that are less than requested, Reg B requires notification of that decision and express consent to proceed with the new credit terms. I did not provide either. \n\nI have called the company numerous times and spent hours asking staff to validate I agreed to the less than requested terms and no one has been able to do that. In fact, staff has openly said the info is not on disclosures and a supervisor named XXXX indicated its Synchrony policy to proceed with application and not provide an adverse notice outlining the counteroffer. I believe based on the information Ive been provided, that Synchrony is engaging in UDAAP - unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts and practices and in violation of Reg B. \n\nAdditionally, I was told to contact the credit reporting agencies to dispute the application which to my understanding is unacceptable as the bank should have a satisfactory compliant/compliance management system. \n\nMy expectation was to have been extended a counter offer, which I wouldve declined ; instead an account number was opened. I was told if the account number would be reported to my credit bureau, I would have to request to close the account, and it would be reported as closed per customer request.","date_sent_to_company":"2022-07-04T00:20:43.000Z","issue":"Advertising and marketing, including promotional offers","sub_product":"Store credit card","zip_code":"78023","tags":"Servicemember","has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"5731084","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL","date_received":"2022-07-03T23:49:35.000Z","state":"TX","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Confusing or misleading advertising about the credit card"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["When I went through the application process, I requested a <em>credit</em> limit of XXXX or XXXX, I honestly dont remember which it was. \n\nSadly, synchrony bank did not approve the <em>credit</em> extended but they opened an account with a {$2500.00} <em>credit</em> <em>line</em>. \n\nI saved the <em>terms</em> and conditions shared during the application process and I have not <em>been</em> able to locate a section that indicates I consent to the opening of an account that has less favorable <em>terms</em> than I applied for."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> card or prepaid card"],"sub_product":["Store <em>credit</em> card"],"sub_issue":["Confusing or misleading advertising about the <em>credit</em> card"]},"sort":[14.739602,"5731084"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"1685037","_score":14.469841,"_source":{"product":"Mortgage","complaint_what_happened":"XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX have a home equity line of credit second mortgage loan with Bank of America on our home. This loan ( XXXX ) originated on XX/XX/XXXX. The loan agreement expiration date is XXXX XXXX, XXXX and it comes with a ten year draw period. It is common practice for a performing line of credit for the bank to extend the draw period once the initial term expires. In my case, Bank of America chose to deny us the option to extend the draw period. Under the Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act, discrimination against credit applicants on the basis of race is prohibited. It is my claim that Bank of America is not in compliance with the Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act. There has NOT be any material change in our financial circumstances, contrary to what Bank of America claims. When this loan commenced, we chose the interest only payment option because it allowed us the greatest flexibility with payment amounts on a monthly basis. The payment history reflects that although we chose the interest only payment option, we always made principal payments on a monthly basis. The value of our home is such that it is in compliance with the banks ' loan to value ratio. Once the draw period expired in XX/XX/XXXX, we requested a 10 year extension. This was denied by the bank. They informed us that we needed to amortize the loan balance over a specific term. The payment option Bank of America initially offered to us as significantly above our capacity to pay. We informed them that we could not comply with these new payment terms and they offered their RMA program, Request For Mortgage Assistance. Since XX/XX/XXXX, we 've completed multiple forms sent to us by the bank, During this time period, we 've continued to make the same loan payments we 've made during the past ten years, which is an amount above the interest only threshold. On XX/XX/XXXX, I was informed that Bank of America has been reporting to the credit bureaus negative information regarding payments. It was my understanding that during this credit review period, that the payment terms would remain the same, particularly since I informed the Bank that we could not make there revised fully amortized payments. At that same time Bank of America is allegedly claiming to assist us with the line of credit, they are reporting negative information to the credit bureaus, thereby ruining my credit. Bank of America should be held accountable for this unfair action. They are the ones who have requested on XXXX different occasions over the past five months for additional credit information. We have provided this data on a timely basis while at the same time, paying on the line of credit. During this transition period of gathering financial information, you would think that Bank of America would allow the initial payment terms to apply until it could be determined what we could afford to pay. Bank of America is practicing unfair credit policies.","date_sent_to_company":"2015-12-08T13:08:31.000Z","issue":"Loan modification,collection,foreclosure","sub_product":"Home equity loan or line of credit","zip_code":"94506","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"1685037","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION","date_received":"2015-12-06T22:10:39.000Z","state":"CA","company_public_response":"Company chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":null},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["On XX/XX/XXXX, I was informed that Bank of America has <em>been</em> reporting to the <em>credit</em> bureaus negative information regarding payments. It was my understanding that during this <em>credit</em> review period, that the payment <em>terms</em> would remain the same, particularly since I informed the Bank that we could not make there revised fully amortized payments."],"sub_product":["Home equity loan or <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em>"]},"sort":[14.469841,"1685037"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"7851740","_score":14.116945,"_source":{"product":"Vehicle loan or lease","complaint_what_happened":"**Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure** To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to formally notify you of a default under our an agreement dated XX/XX/, with NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION concerning my application for a line of credit. \nDespite my eligibility and compliance with the terms set forth, my request for a line of credit has been denied. This action not only violates our agreement but also contravenes federal law, specifically infringing upon my rights as a consumer. It is important to note that company procedures do not supersede federal law. \nAccording to 15 USC 1602 ( F ), it is clear that access to credit is a right afforded to me. Furthermore, 15 USC 1693 ( a ) ( 3 ) explicitly states that discrimination against individuals exercising their rights under this statute is prohibited. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION company 's denial of my credit application is, therefore, a direct violation of these laws. \nTo resolve this matter, I am offering NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION the opportunity to cure this default by granting me a line of credit. The amount of credit should reflect the maximum allowable based on the principal balance of my principal account, XXXX XXXX Signed, XXXX XXXX XXXX PRIVATE AMERICAN, GRANTOR-SOLE BENEFICIARY, ISSUER NATURAL PERSON of principal account XXXX XXXX , ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, WITHOUT RECOURSE FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.","date_sent_to_company":"2023-11-14T19:56:25.000Z","issue":"Problems at the end of the loan or lease","sub_product":"Loan","zip_code":"85042","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"7851740","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION","date_received":"2023-11-14T19:47:43.000Z","state":"AZ","company_public_response":"Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law","sub_issue":"Problem related to refinancing"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["**Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure** To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to formally notify you of a default under our an agreement dated XX/XX/, with NAVY FEDERAL <em>CREDIT</em> UNION concerning my application for a <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em>. \nDespite my eligibility and <em>compliance</em> with the <em>terms</em> set forth, my request for a <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em> has <em>been</em> denied. This action not only violates our agreement but also contravenes federal law, specifically infringing upon my rights as a consumer."],"company":["NAVY FEDERAL <em>CREDIT</em> UNION"]},"sort":[14.116945,"7851740"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"14717360","_score":13.810434,"_source":{"product":"Payday loan, title loan, personal loan, or advance loan","complaint_what_happened":"CreditFresh labels my account as a line of credit, so credit card or personal line of credit is the most accurate CFPB product category. \n\nMY core issue is being charged high fees equivalent to an APR of 127 %, which violates Florida law and likely TILA. \n\n\nI received a {$5000.00} line of credit through CreditFresh, issued by XXXX XXXX. Since the auto-debit began, I have been paying {$500.00} every month, but only about {$50.00} per month is applied to the principal. The remaining $ XXXX is being taken as fees or Billing Cycle Charges. \n\nThis means I am effectively paying around {$500.00} per month in interest-like charges for a {$5000.00} balance, which is approximately 120 % APR or more. This extremely high cost of credit was not clearly disclosed in the loan agreement. I could not find a clear APR stated anywhere, and I only realized how excessive the charges were after the automatic debits began. \n\nWhen I contacted CreditFresh and XXXX XXXX, they responded that there is no APR for this product, but acknowledged that if {$1000.00} were outstanding for a year, the effective APR would be around 127 % suggesting mine is even higher. \n\nI live in Florida, where : State law caps APRs on loans under {$10000.00} at 36 %, Interest above 18 % can be considered usurious and illegal, And TILA requires full disclosure of the true cost of credit. \n\nI believe this loan is disguised as a line of credit to avoid interest rate caps and disclosure laws. The terms are confusing, misleading, and possibly illegal. Im seeking a full review of this products compliance with Florida law, Truth in Lending Act rules, and fair lending practices.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-08-01T16:32:19.000Z","issue":"Charged fees or interest you didn't expect","sub_product":"Personal line of credit","zip_code":"32256","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"14717360","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Credit Fresh Holdings Inc","date_received":"2025-07-17T16:39:35.000Z","state":"FL","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":null},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["<em>Credit</em>Fresh labels my account as a <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em>, so <em>credit</em> card or personal <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em> is the most accurate CFPB product category. \n\nMY core issue is being charged high fees equivalent to an APR of 127 %, which violates Florida law and likely TILA. \n\n\nI received a {$5000.00} <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em> through <em>Credit</em>Fresh, issued by XXXX XXXX. Since the auto-debit began, I have <em>been</em> paying {$500.00} every month, but only about {$50.00} per month is applied to the principal."],"company":["<em>Credit</em> Fresh Holdings Inc"],"sub_product":["Personal <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em>"]},"sort":[13.810434,"14717360"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"3915653","_score":13.664813,"_source":{"product":"Credit card or prepaid card","complaint_what_happened":"I applied for a Wells Fargo credit card on line for a balance transfer from my XXXX account. When I applied on line the response I received stated my application was under review and someone would contact me shortly. I never heard back and contacted Wells Fargo at XXXX to find out the status of my application as well as the terms and conditions of a potential credit card, on XX/XX/XXXX and again on XX/XX/XXXX. Another week went by and went I went to my online banking, a credit card account had been opened with a balance transfer of {$5000.00} and a fee of {$140.00} on XX/XX/XXXX! I called Wells extremely upset and advise I never authorized this credit card as I had called to obtain the terms and conditions of the card and they had violated regulation B as no notice of approval had been issued to me. They said someone from the complaint department would be in touch. Still hearing nothing I received an email on XX/XX/XXXX from XXXX XXXX at XXXX stating she was from the executive office and was working on my complaint and I would hear something by XX/XX/XXXX. Still hearing nothing by that date I had contacted her on XX/XX/XXXX and she indicated because Wells Fargo sent me a notice that I had been approved they would not refund the balance transfer fee. I urged her that I was dissatisfied and had never received a letter, and why hadnt they called me back, I would be paying off the card and closing it out in the next 3 weeks and I had moved residences and I had been a long time customer of Wells, as a courtesy I want the {$140.00} fee refunded. XXXX stated that because a letter was mailed, there was nothing further. I am appalled at the compliance violation and lack of professionalism with Wells Fargo thinking they can just issue credit without confirmation from the customer. Please try to recoup this balance transfer fee for me. Thank you.","date_sent_to_company":"2020-10-23T19:24:41.000Z","issue":"Fees or interest","sub_product":"General-purpose credit card or charge card","zip_code":"27527","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"3915653","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"WELLS FARGO & COMPANY","date_received":"2020-10-23T19:06:42.000Z","state":"NC","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Problem with fees"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I applied for a Wells Fargo <em>credit</em> card on <em>line</em> for a balance transfer from my XXXX account. When I applied on <em>line</em> the response I received stated my application was under review and someone would contact me shortly. I never heard back and contacted Wells Fargo at XXXX to find out the status of my application as well as the <em>terms</em> and conditions of a potential <em>credit</em> card, on XX/XX/XXXX and again on XX/XX/XXXX."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> card or prepaid card"],"sub_product":["General-purpose <em>credit</em> card or charge card"]},"sort":[13.664813,"3915653"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"3906158","_score":13.602134,"_source":{"product":"Credit card or prepaid card","complaint_what_happened":"This account was opened in XXXX of XXXX only for the purpose of taking advantage of an eighteen-month interest deferred promotion for the purchase of a snowblower. \n\nThe required minimum payments of {$27.00} dollars were made on-time for every month until XXXX of XXXX were the remaining balance on the snowblower purchase was paid-in-full. Again, all payments were made on-time and in compliance with the card agreement and promotion as the were presented at the time of the account being opened and the purchase transaction. \n\nIt appears that Home Depot/Citibank elected to modify the terms and conditions of the account in XXXX of XXXX. The account terms and conditions require that I be informed of any modification to that agreement. Additionally, I am to be afforded an opportunity to opt-out of any of any changes. \n\nPrior to XXXX of XXXX I was unaware of any modification of the terms and conditions. Citibank has not provided any announcement of change. I have not been afforded any opportunity to opt-out. \n\nOn XX/XX/XXXX I received a call from Citibank at XXXX. The representative indicated that I was delinquent on the account and wanted me to make a payment over the phone. As I had the payments related to this account pre-scheduled with my local bank. I dismissed the call as a scam and hung-up. \n\nTo check on the account, I called back using the XXXX number on my Home Depot card about 15 minutes later. I confirmed that Citibank believed that I was late on payments. I explained that this wasnt possible as I have the payments scheduled and I have noted them in my checking account. Upon some more investigation the true issue was brought to light. In XXXX of XXXX Citibank changed the minimum payment from {$27.00} to {$28.00}. I indicated to the representative that the minimum payment was set in the terms and conditions at {$27.00} and that Citibank could not increase. The representative indicated that Citibank could change the minimum payment at any time. \n\nI received another call from Citibank on XX/XX/XXXX. Again, the Citibank representative requested an immediate payment. I recounted the circumstances with the representative who indicated that he could resolve the issue if I were to make a payment. I indicated that I would not be paying any amounts not owed and that the proper corrections to the account by restoring the correct minimum payment and removing the erroneous late payment fees would bring the account into good standing. The representative refused to take action. I requested that they discontinue any collection calls. \n\nOn my own, I reviewed my account in detail. I discovered that the minimum payment was increased from {$27.00} to {$28.00} on the XX/XX/XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) statement. An on-time payment was made for {$27.00} on XX/XX/XXXX. Citibank saw this payment as insufficient and assessed a {$28.00} late fee on XX/XX/XXXX. \n\nContinuing into XXXX, again I made a {$27.00} payment on time in compliance with the terms and conditions. Citibank again imposed a {$39.00} late payment fee and began to accrue interest. \n\nI have continued to make the {$27.00} minimum payments on-time monthly per the agreement in effect at the time of purchase. I made a final payment of {$1200.00} on XX/XX/XXXX to complete full payment at the end of the promotional term. \n\nOn XX/XX/XXXX I sent a letter of dispute to Citibank via First-Class mail.  Additionally, I requested that the account be closed. No response to this letter was received. \n\nOn XX/XX/XXXX I sent another letter of dispute to Citibank. This letter was sent by Certified Mail with return receipt. This mailing included a copy of the XX/XX/XXXX letter and additionally requested immediate correction to the associated credit reporting, correction to the account, closure of the account, and documentation confirming those actions. I also requested compensation for damages related to the incorrect negative credit reporting actions. \n\nTwo responses have been received from Citibank, however neither of these responses address the disputed change in minimum payment or terms and conditions. On XX/XX/XXXX, I received a letter dated XX/XX/XXXX. On XX/XX/XXXX I received a letter dated XX/XX/XXXX. Both letters only state that the credit reporting actions are correct. \n\nOn XX/XX/XXXX, I received an e-mail indicating that there was an important document posted in my Home Depot on-line account. The document was non-descript but requested that I contact Home Depot Credit regarding my request. \n\nI called Citibank at XXXX in hopes of clarifying or resolving these issues. Over 49 minutes, I spoke with two representatives, First XXXX ( sp? ) and then XXXX. Both were able to identify and understand the issue, however neither took any action to resolve or correct the account. I have an audio recording of this call, however there is little substance. \n\nOn XX/XX/XXXX I made a request to Citibank using their on-line messaging system in my on-line account. Please send copies of any card agreements which pertained to this account between the dates of XX/XX/XXXX and the present. Please deliver via USPS. A response was received on XX/XX/XXXX which only contained the current terms and conditions stating a minimum payment of {$28.00}. There is no information regarding the effective date of these terms or any previous version. This is the first time I have been presented with these terms and conditions. \n\nThe creditor has not been willing or able to resolve this issue directly.","date_sent_to_company":"2020-10-19T15:52:55.000Z","issue":"Fees or interest","sub_product":"Store credit card","zip_code":"14580","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"3906158","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"CITIBANK, N.A.","date_received":"2020-10-19T15:22:43.000Z","state":"NY","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Problem with fees"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["This is the first time I have <em>been</em> presented with these <em>terms</em> and conditions. \n\nThe creditor has not <em>been</em> willing or able to resolve this issue directly."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> card or prepaid card"],"sub_product":["Store <em>credit</em> card"]},"sort":[13.602134,"3906158"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"8033647","_score":13.397997,"_source":{"product":"Mortgage","complaint_what_happened":"I am writing to formally address the ongoing and egregious violations of the Home Equity Line of Credit ( HELOC ) Agreement, as well as the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ( RESPA ) and pertinent consumer protection statutes by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC ( hereinafter referred to as \" SLS '' ). This correspondence serves as an official notification of the breaches of contract that SLS has committed and continues to perpetuate. \n\nSLS is in clear violation of the terms stipulated within my HELOC Agreement, specifically concerning the obligation to provide monthly statements delineating the status of my account. Despite the explicit terms mandating the provision of these statements ( section 4b. ), SLS failed egregiously to fulfill this fundamental obligation, constituting a direct breach of our contractual agreement. \n\nFurthermore, in accordance with RESPA and other consumer protection laws, SLS is legally bound to comply with the requirement of furnishing monthly statements to borrowers. The consistent failure to provide such crucial documentation not only violates our contractual arrangement, but also constitutes a violation of the aforementioned federal statutes designed to safeguard consumers. \n\nRepeated attempts on my part to rectify this matter through communication and also filing complaints with SLS, have been met with disregard and an absence of appropriate action.\n\nSLS has regrettably neglected to acknowledge its breach of contract and the concurrent violations of RESPA. Such behavior is unacceptable and undermines the trust and obligations inherent in our contractual relationship. \n\nIt is pertinent to note that this is not an isolated incident, as evidenced by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 's Consent Order against SLS, highlighting prior transgressions concerning RESPA. This recurring pattern of non-compliance with federal laws demonstrates a systemic issue that requires immediate rectification on the part of SLS. In light of the aforementioned breaches and consistent disregard for contractual and statutory obligations, I demand prompt remedial action. Specifically, I insist on immediate rectification of the failure to provide monthly statements and a comprehensive plan to ensure future compliance with the terms of the HELOC Agreement and relevant federal laws. Please consider this correspondence as an earnest attempt to amicably resolve these concerns. Your prompt attention to this matter is anticipated and appreciated.","date_sent_to_company":"2023-12-20T23:07:56.000Z","issue":"Struggling to pay mortgage","sub_product":"Home equity loan or line of credit (HELOC)","zip_code":"91361","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"8033647","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Specialized Loan Servicing Holdings LLC","date_received":"2023-12-20T22:48:28.000Z","state":"CA","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Foreclosure"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I am writing to formally address the ongoing and egregious violations of the Home Equity <em>Line</em> of <em>Credit</em> ( HELOC ) Agreement, as well as the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ( RESPA ) and pertinent consumer protection statutes by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC ( hereinafter referred to as \" SLS '' ). This correspondence serves as an official notification of the breaches of contract that SLS has committed and continues to perpetuate."],"sub_product":["Home equity loan or <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em> (HELOC)"]},"sort":[13.397997,"8033647"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"11415837","_score":12.7267065,"_source":{"product":"Credit card","complaint_what_happened":"On XX/XX/year>, I referred a friend from my XXXX XXXX XXXX to open an Amex credit card and they were successfully approved. The referral bonus conditions for this referral were XXXX bonus points to be awarded to me and an additional XXXX bonus points on all spend at restaurants worldwide, up to {$25000.00} of spend, for XXXX months from the time of the referral ( up to a total of XXXX bonus points ). I'm reaching out as I've been unable to get in contact with the compliance team at Amex. According to the terms of the offer, I would have XXXX months from the date of my referral ( XX/XX/year> XXXX XX/XX/year> ) for my dining spend to earn the additional XXXX bonus points. Just to confirm my understanding of the terms of this offer, I reached out to Amex chat support on XX/XX/year> to confirm the last day that my dining spend would be eligible for XXXX bonus points and XXXX from Amex confirmed the end date of this offer to be XX/XX/year>. Based on this info, I made XXXX dining charges during the period of May 14-XXXX XXXX : Ruckus Pizza on XX/XX/XXXX for {$26.00} and XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX on XX/XX/XXXX for {$3100.00}. Based on these charges, I expected to receive XXXX bonus points from the XXXX bonus offer. After the XXXX week timeframe that points are expected to post to my account within, I noticed that the points still hadn't been credited. It took numerous attempts in contacting Amex to realize that buried in the XXXX XXXX XXXX is a line about this XXXX dining spend part of the referral bonus only being available for XXXX months from the XXXX referral. Since I had made a prior referral in XXXX, it turns out my XXXX charges would not be considered qualifying spend for this offer. This information completely contradicts what I had been advised of in advance by XXXX from Amex. The compliance team has provided a goodwill gesture of XXXX points due to this misinformation, but I'm reaching out for the remaining XXXX points that I should have earned as a result of this referral bonus offer according to XXXX from Amex.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-01-07T15:42:48.000Z","issue":"Advertising and marketing, including promotional offers","sub_product":"General-purpose credit card or charge card","zip_code":"27526","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"11415837","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY","date_received":"2025-01-07T15:37:07.000Z","state":"NC","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Didn't receive advertised or promotional terms"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["After the XXXX week timeframe that points are expected to post to my account within, I noticed that the points still hadn't <em>been</em> <em>credited</em>. It took numerous attempts in contacting Amex to realize that buried in the XXXX XXXX XXXX is a <em>line</em> about this XXXX dining spend part of the referral bonus only being available for XXXX months from the XXXX referral. Since I had made a prior referral in XXXX, it turns out my XXXX charges would not be considered qualifying spend for this offer."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> card"],"sub_product":["General-purpose <em>credit</em> card or charge card"],"sub_issue":["Didn't receive advertised or promotional <em>terms</em>"]},"sort":[12.7267065,"11415837"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"20206618","_score":12.198362,"_source":{"product":"Checking or savings account","complaint_what_happened":"I am submitting this complaint regarding Truist Banks handling and application of interest rates on two XXXX XXXX accounts that were opened under the same promotional offer. \n\nMy partner and I opened a joint XXXX XXXX  account with Truist under a promotional interest rate advertised at approximately 4 % APY. Shortly thereafter, while the same promotion was still active, I opened an individual XXXX  XXXX  account under the same promotional offer, with a substantially larger balance. \n\nBoth accounts were opened within the same promotional timeframe and are structured as the same type of XXXX XXXX account product. \n\nWhile I understand that interest rates may fluctuate, the issue is that the interest rates applied to these two accounts have diverged significantly, despite being opened under what appears to be the same promotion and product structure.\n\nCurrently : The joint account with the lower balance is earning approximately 3 % APY The individual account with the significantly larger balance has fluctuated between approximately 0.5 % and 1.7 % APY Truist has not provided any explanation for this discrepancy.\n\nI have contacted Truist customer service multiple times seeking clarification regarding the rate structure and the promotional terms applied to these accounts. Specifically, I have requested : The rate tier structure applicable to this XXXX XXXX product The promotion code and product code associated with each account An explanation as to why accounts opened under the same promotional offer are receiving materially different interest rates Instead of providing this information, Truist customer service has repeatedly directed me back to the branch manager at the Truist branch in XXXX XXXX, West Virginia. \n\nThis is not an acceptable resolution path. I have previously experienced significant issues with this branch manager regarding the mishandling of a line of credit application, which ultimately resulted in the application being disqualified due to issues involving an appraiser selected by Truist. During that process, I was informed that the matter had been escalated to management when it had not been. I ultimately secured a line of credit through another institution within two weeks.\n\nGiven this history, I do not have confidence that the branch manager can provide an impartial or competent resolution to this issue.\n\nMore importantly, this matter should not require resolution at the branch level, as it involves the application of promotional interest rates and product terms that should be governed by Truists corporate policies and disclosures.\n\nDespite multiple attempts to resolve this issue through Truists customer service channels, the bank has refused to provide documentation or explanation regarding how the interest rates are determined or why the accounts are receiving materially different rates.\n\nThe lack of transparency raises concerns regarding whether Truist is properly disclosing and consistently applying the terms of its promotional XXXX  XXXX  accounts, particularly when accounts are opened under the same advertised promotion. \n\nAt this point, I am requesting that Truist provide the following : 1. The official promotional terms and rate structure applicable to the XXXX XXXX accounts opened during this promotion. \n2. The product code and promotional code associated with each of my accounts.\n\n3. A clear explanation of why the two accounts are receiving materially different interest rates despite being opened under the same promotional offer.\n\n4. Confirmation that the interest rates applied to my accounts are consistent with Truists published disclosures and promotional terms.\n\nTo date, Truist has not provided any meaningful explanation and has instead redirected the issue to a branch manager who has previously mishandled other matters related to my accounts.\n\nGiven the circumstances, I am requesting a formal review by Truists corporate compliance team to ensure that the promotional terms and interest rate structures are being applied transparently and consistently.","date_sent_to_company":"2026-03-12T16:56:49.000Z","issue":"Managing an account","sub_product":"Other banking product or service","zip_code":"254XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"20206618","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION","date_received":"2026-03-12T16:17:58.000Z","state":"WV","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Banking errors"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I have previously experienced significant issues with this branch manager regarding the mishandling of a <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em> application, which ultimately resulted in the application being disqualified due to issues involving an appraiser selected by Truist. During that process, I was informed that the matter had <em>been</em> escalated to management when it had not <em>been</em>. I ultimately secured a <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em> through another institution within two weeks."]},"sort":[12.198362,"20206618"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"15386542","_score":12.050902,"_source":{"product":"Credit card","complaint_what_happened":"Complaint Regarding Barclays Credit Line Reduction and Refusal to Provide Human Review Barclays Arrival Premier Account ending in : XXXX To the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau : I am filing this complaint regarding Barclays Bank Delaware and the abrupt and unfounded reduction of my credit limit, likely instigated by AI review.\n\nI have been a Barclays cardholder since XXXX. In that time, I have maintained a spotless payment history with Barclays, with no late payments or adverse events on this account. Overnight, my credit line was reduced by nearly {$11000.00}, despite the fact that the only late payment appearing on my entire credit history since XXXX was an inaccurately reported XX/XX/XXXX installment micro-loan late payment, and is under active dispute with XXXX. \n\nThe late payment being reported is inaccurate. The loan agreement for that installment loan clearly shows that payments were due on the XXXX of each month, which I followed. However, the account was reported as late in XX/XX/XXXX despite my compliance with the contract terms. This inaccurate reporting is the sole basis for the claim that I have accounts with delinquency, which Barclays cited as justification for lowering my line. No other \" accounts '' have ever shown a delinquency, so the plural \" accounts '' is also wholly inaccurate.\n\nWhen I received Barclays notice, I attempted to resolve this matter directly with the bank. Unfortunately, every time I called, I was met with customer service agents reading scripts very slowly and refusing to engage with me beyond those scripts. I was repeatedly told to submit credit line increase requests, but each request came back with the same boilerplate denial, citing the same inaccurate information.\n\nAt no point have I been able to escalate my concerns to an actual human credit review specialist who could exercise discretion or even acknowledge the fact that the delinquency in question is inaccurate and under dispute. Barclays has made it effectively impossible for me as a consumer to have this issue addressed in good faith I am therefore resorting to the CFPB for assistance, because Barclays automated and scripted responses have left me with no way to resolve this matter. I ask that Barclays be required to review my case manually, as human beings, taking into account : My clean payment history with Barclays since XXXX The fact that my only reported late payment ( XX/XX/XXXX ) is inaccurately reported, as evidenced by the loan agreement, and is actively disputed with the credit bureau The adverse impact of this overnight {$11000.00} reduction on my credit utilization and financial standing I appreciate your attention and request your assistance in compelling Barclays to properly review and reconsider this decision. \n\n\nSincerely, XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2025-08-19T06:14:02.000Z","issue":"Trouble using your card","sub_product":"General-purpose credit card or charge card","zip_code":"70119","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"15386542","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE","date_received":"2025-08-19T05:46:38.000Z","state":"LA","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Credit card company won't increase or decrease your credit limit"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Complaint Regarding Barclays <em>Credit</em> <em>Line</em> Reduction and Refusal to Provide Human Review Barclays Arrival Premier Account ending in : XXXX To the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau : I am filing this complaint regarding Barclays Bank Delaware and the abrupt and unfounded reduction of my <em>credit</em> limit, likely instigated by AI review.\n\nI have <em>been</em> a Barclays cardholder since XXXX."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> card"],"sub_product":["General-purpose <em>credit</em> card or charge card"],"sub_issue":["<em>Credit</em> card company won't increase or decrease your <em>credit</em> limit"]},"sort":[12.050902,"15386542"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"16376985","_score":11.588208,"_source":{"product":"Debt collection","complaint_what_happened":"AMENDED CFPB COMPLAINT NEW INFORMATION AND REGULATION Z VIOLATIONS Complainant : XXXX XXXX XXXX West XXXX XXXX XXXX, OH XXXX Email : XXXX Phone : XXXX Company Complained About : Velocity Investments , LLC Purpose of This Amendment This submission amends my prior complaint regarding Velocity Investments LLC.\n\nI am providing new information and evidence showing violations of the Truth in Lending Act ( Regulation Z ), along with continuing violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) and related credit-reporting errors. \nPlease treat this filing as an amended complaint, not a duplicate. \nDescription of the Problem Velocity Investments , LLC is suing me in state court for {$7600.00}.\n\nThey are attempting to collect a debt that can not be validated because the original creditors documentation and credit reporting are fundamentally contradictory. \nVelocity has failed to provide consistent or reliable information identifying the true nature, terms, or amount of the alleged debt. \n\n\n\nRegulation Z ( Truth in Lending Act ) Violations The original creditor, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX violated Regulation Z ( 12 C.F.R. 1026 ) by issuing contradictory and misleading disclosures : The Truth in Lending Disclosure describes the account as a 35-month fixed installment loan. \nThe XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX defines it as a closed-end line of credit repayable over 36 months. \nCredit-bureau reports list it as an open-end line of credit with 1-month terms.\n\nThese conflicts violate 1026.17 ( c ) ( 1 ), which requires that disclosures accurately reflect the legal obligation between the parties. \nBecause these disclosure errors affect the finance-charge calculation and payment schedule, the account was never properly originated under federal law. \n\nBy collecting and litigating on this defective account, XXXX XXXX XXXX is compounding the Regulation Z violation and misrepresenting the legal status and character of the debt, contrary to FDCPA 1692e.\n\nKey Contradictions That Make Validation Impossible 1. Misrepresentation of Product Type Velocitys validation includes a TILA disclosure for a XXXX installment loan, but the credit bureaus show it as a XXXX line of credit. \nThese are legally distinct products with different disclosure and repayment rules. \nXXXX. Contradictory Contract Terms The Upgrade agreement clearly states : The Upgrade Card Personal Credit Line is a closed-end line of credit. \nEach advance is repayable over 36 months in substantially equal monthly payments. \nThe credit limit will not be replenished as it would in an open-end line of credit. \nYet the creditor reports it as open-end, contradicting its own contract. \nXXXX. Inconsistent Debt Amounts Velocitys lawsuit : {$7600.00} TILA Disclosure Total of Payments : {$10000.00} Credit reporting : {$7600.00} ( high balance ) and {$6900.00} ( written off ) No accounting has been provided to reconcile these figures. \n4. Mathematically Impossible Credit Reporting {$200.00} payments reduce balances by only {$98.00}.\n\nWritten-off amounts fluctuate without explanation.\n\nBalances fail basic arithmetic consistency. \n\n\n\nAttempts to Resolve I have : XXXX. Sent multiple debt-validation requests to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX contradictions. \nXXXX. Received inadequate responses that ignored the misrepresentations. \nXXXX. Tried to resolve the dispute directly before litigation, without success. \n\nDespite this, Velocity continues to pursue the lawsuit and collection efforts.\n\nViolations of Federal Law FDCPA Violations 1692g Failure to properly validate the debt due to contradictory and incomplete documentation.\n\n1692e False representation of the character, amount, or legal status of the debt.\n\n1692f Unfair and unconscionable collection of an unverifiable debt.\n\nFCRA Concerns The original creditors inaccurate credit reporting forms the basis of Velocitys claims and perpetuates false information in consumer credit files.\n\nDesired Resolution I respectfully request that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) : 1. Require Velocity Investments LLC to dismiss its lawsuit until the debt can be properly validated.\n\n2. Order Velocity to cease all collection activity on this account.\n\n3. Require correction of inaccurate credit reporting tied to this debt. \nXXXX. Investigate this pattern of collection based on contradictory documentation. \nXXXX. Ensure full compliance with FDCPA, FCRA, and Regulation Z.\n\nSupporting Documentation Lawsuit filed by Velocity Investments , LLC Validation letter and TILA disclosure provided by Velocity Credit reports showing contradictory reporting by the original creditor The Upgrade Card Personal Credit Line Agreement Payment history analysis demonstrating mathematical errors Correspondence with Velocity Conclusion This is not a dispute over dollar amounts it is a fundamental failure of debt validation and disclosure. \nVelocity can not prove what debt they own when the original creditor can not even describe its product correctly. \nNo consumer should face litigation over such unverifiable and contradictory records. \n\n\n\nRespectfully submitted, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, OH XXXX Email : XXXX Phone : XXXX Date : XX/XX/scrub>XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2025-10-05T07:04:23.000Z","issue":"False statements or representation","sub_product":"Credit card debt","zip_code":"45238","tags":"Older American","has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"16376985","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Velocity Portfolio Group","date_received":"2025-10-05T06:56:46.000Z","state":"OH","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Attempted to collect wrong amount"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Misrepresentation of Product Type Velocitys validation includes a TILA disclosure for a XXXX installment loan, but the <em>credit</em> bureaus show it as a XXXX <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em>. \nThese are legally distinct products with different disclosure and repayment rules. \nXXXX. Contradictory Contract <em>Terms</em> The Upgrade agreement clearly states : The Upgrade Card Personal <em>Credit</em> <em>Line</em> is a closed-end <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em>. \nEach advance is repayable over 36 months in substantially equal monthly payments."],"sub_product":["<em>Credit</em> card debt"]},"sort":[11.588208,"16376985"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"5601091","_score":11.454665,"_source":{"product":"Credit card or prepaid card","complaint_what_happened":"I am a XXXX ( XXXX card ) member of American Express for which privilege I pay and annual fee of {$5000.00} a year. I have been an American Express member continuously since XXXX. In short, I am a good customer. I have 4 American Express credit card accounts and for 3 of them I receive statements and pay them in a timely manner. This complaint is about the 4th account- for which American Express refuses to send me statements and consequently is not complying with the terms of the Fair Credit Billing Act, 1974. The Act requires American Express to send written statements to creditors at the address requested by the creditor. I have provided American Express with my home address and I have requested that statements are sent to that address, but American Express refuses to do so. Section 1666 ( b ) a. of the Act states : \" A creditor may not treat a payment on a credit card account under an open end consumer credit plan as late for any purpose, unless the creditor has adopted reasonable procedures designed to ensure that each periodic statement including the information required by section 1637 ( b ) of this title is mailed or delivered to the consumer not later than 21 days before the payment due date. '' American Express has not mailed or delivered statements to me. Someone called XXXX called me from American Express on a recorded line and I requested that statements be sent to me in compliance with the Act, but she refused. Now American Express is threatening to discontinue the use of my card","date_sent_to_company":"2022-05-25T21:26:36.000Z","issue":"Problem when making payments","sub_product":"General-purpose credit card or charge card","zip_code":"110XX","tags":"Servicemember","has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"5601091","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY","date_received":"2022-05-25T20:59:36.000Z","state":"NY","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"You never received your bill or did not know a payment was due"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I have <em>been</em> an American Express member continuously since XXXX. In short, I am a good customer. I have 4 American Express <em>credit</em> card accounts and for 3 of them I receive statements and pay them in a timely manner. This complaint is about the 4th account- for which American Express refuses to send me statements and consequently is not complying with the <em>terms</em> of the Fair <em>Credit</em> Billing Act, 1974."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> card or prepaid card"],"sub_product":["General-purpose <em>credit</em> card or charge card"]},"sort":[11.454665,"5601091"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"3521106","_score":11.284813,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"In XX/XX/2013 my divorce was finalized and as part of the Marital Separation Agreement the ex-wife was required to refinance the marital property located at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Il. XXXX. The court order clearly indicates that my name along with any financial responsibility be removed from both the first mortgage & equity credit line and will be the sole responsibility of XXXX XXXX XXXX. The quit claim deed was recorded with XXXX County with a copy provided along with the court order to Chase when the first mortgage was refinanced in the ex-wifes name. I am not sure why Chase never refinanced the credit line as part of that transaction when there was a legal responsibility and obligation to do so. What I also dont understand is it is considered to be normal industry practice that when a refinance is completed that all outstanding loans that are secured by the residence should be required in the terms of the refinance and it was clearly not. \n\nI have recently disputed the negative credit reporting done by Chase since the equity credit line is now in default since it appears I was never removed from this account with the refinance. The account is now in arrears and my credit score has been severely impacted negatively. I am somewhat troubled in the fact that I have never been contacted by any representative from Chase since the account went delinquent, never received any past due statements/notice or any other type of correspondence. The only notification I have received was the credit alert stating that my credit score dropped significantly from roughly 800 to 660 in XXXX. This lack of communication on a past due collection effort clearly is a direct violation of any type of fair credit reporting and could be considered a compliance violation as related to credit bureau reporting which I am exploring advice from legal counsel. \n\nOn XX/XX/XXXX I visited my local Chase branch and spoke with XXXX XXXX, Officer I provided all supporting documentation indicating I am not responsible for the debt. To date, I have not received any additional feedback from Chase, the only responses I have received is from the credit reporting agencies stating Chase has denied my dispute as being accurate reporting. \n\nThe other items I am disputing in my credit report that Chase is reporting are my actual property addresses. There are multiple address lines being reported for two locations listed in XXXX, Il which I have never lived in or been responsible for and are in-fact the addresses of the ex-wife and not mine. This also needs resolution. \n\nIt is my hope for Chase to correct this situation without further legal expense or intervention by counsel. I would fully appreciate and expect Chase to retroactively reverse any negative credit bureau reporting to all agencies and immediately cease any reporting of this delinquent debt under my social security number. \n\nAlong with filing this complaint with Chase I am also contacting and filing a complaint with the CFPB. \n\nI would appreciate further discussion and your time in correcting this negative reporting and oversight.","date_sent_to_company":"2020-02-05T19:01:08.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"60517","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"3521106","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.","date_received":"2020-02-05T18:46:36.000Z","state":"IL","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Information belongs to someone else"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I have recently disputed the negative <em>credit</em> reporting done by Chase since the equity <em>credit</em> <em>line</em> is now in default since it appears I was never removed from this account with the refinance. The account is now in arrears and my <em>credit</em> score has <em>been</em> severely impacted negatively. I am somewhat troubled in the fact that I have never <em>been</em> contacted by any representative from Chase since the account went delinquent, never received any past due statements/notice or any other type of correspondence."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> reporting, <em>credit</em> repair services, or other personal consumer reports"],"sub_product":["<em>Credit</em> reporting"]},"sort":[11.284813,"3521106"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"10550037","_score":11.049746,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"**Subject** : Formal Complaint of Discriminatory Lending Practices and Violation of Consumer Rights **RE : Bank of America Loan Denial** **Bank of America Address** : XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX*Transaction Date** XXXX XX/XX/year> XXXXAmount Paid** : {$200000.00} **Payment Method** : Credit Car Loan -- - **To the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ), ** I, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX respectfully submit this formal complaint regarding the unlawful and discriminatory practices I encountered during my loan application process with Bank of America. My loan application was denied on the basis of my credit score, despite having demonstrated financial capability and compliance with federal requirements under the **Federal Reserve Act** and contract law. \n1. **Discriminatory Lending Practices in Violation of Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( ECOA ) ** Bank of America cited my credit score as the sole reason for denying my loan application, stating that my score was \" too low '' and contained \" too many negative entries. '' I believe this denial constitutes **discrimination**, particularly in violation of the **Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( ECOA ) ( 15 U.S.C. 1691 ) **, which prohibits creditors from discriminating based on **age, race, or source of income**. By denying my loan application despite my demonstrated ability to contract, my **right to fair access to credit** has been unlawfully obstructed. \n2. **The Right to Negotiate Terms and Disregard of Lawful Payment Tender** As a consumer, I have the right to **negotiate terms** in any transaction where the proposed terms are not ideal or suitable, as provided under **contract law** principles. I demonstrated my willingness and capacity to contract by submitting a valid loan application and accompanying tender. Bank of America 's disregard of my lawful tender and application is in direct violation of the **Federal Reserve Act**, specifically **Ch. 16 ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) **, which mandates that financial institutions provide credit without discrimination and consider all lawful tenders. \nFurthermore, my compliance with the Federal Reserve Acts provisions, which govern the handling of credits, highlights my legal capacity and readiness to engage in a valid and enforceable contract. The refusal to process my application despite this compliance reflects a failure to uphold federal regulations governing credit issuance. \n3. **Unfair Trade Practices Under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act ( FDUTPA ) ** Bank of America 's actions also constitute a violation of the **Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act ( FDUTPA ) **, **Fla. Stat. 501.204**, which protects consumers from **unfair, deceptive, or discriminatory trade practices**. The denial of my loan application based solely on a credit score is an unfair practice that deprives me of equal access to financial services, violating my **right to be treated fairly** and with equal consideration as mandated by state and federal law. \n4. **Right to Redress and Negotiation in Consumer Transactions** In accordance with **consumer protection principles** and **contract law**, I maintain the **right to redress and the right to negotiate the terms** of any transaction that is not favorable. The refusal to negotiate loan terms based on arbitrary factors such as a credit score, rather than a holistic assessment of my financial capacity, violates my fundamental **right to a fair negotiation** in the credit process. \nBy denying me the opportunity to engage in meaningful negotiation, Bank of America has effectively engaged in discriminatory practices that obstruct my **right to receive fair credit terms**. This failure to provide an opportunity to negotiate, despite my capacity and willingness to contract, demonstrates not only a violation of contract principles but also a disregard for the **Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) **, which mandates fairness and transparency in all credit transactions. \n5. **Age-Based Discrimination and Violation of Contract Law** My ability to contract is central to the fairness of any transaction, and by denying my loan application based on arbitrary credit score criteria, Bank of America has also discriminated against me on the basis of **age**. Age discrimination in the extension of credit is expressly prohibited under **ECOA**, and by evaluating me on an improper basis, Bank of America has violated this fundamental protection. \nGiven that I have complied with all legal requirements for submitting a loan application, including the proper **tender of funds** in line with the **Federal Reserve Act**, it is clear that my capacity to contract is valid. Therefore, to deny my loan under these circumstances represents a **breach of contract principles** and an unlawful act of discrimination based on irrelevant factors. \n\nConclusion and Request for Redress As a consumer, I respectfully request that the CFPB conduct a thorough investigation into Bank of America 's discriminatory lending practices and their failure to follow federal and state law. I seek the following redress : 1. **Reconsideration of my loan application** with an opportunity to **negotiate terms** based on a comprehensive evaluation of my financial capacity, not arbitrary credit score metrics. \n2. **Remediation for the discriminatory practices** that have impacted my ability to secure credit on fair and equitable terms.\n\n3. A formal review of Bank of Americas adherence to the **Federal Reserve Act**, **Equal Credit Opportunity Act**, and **Florida consumer protection laws** in their lending practices.\n\nShould this matter not be resolved, I reserve my right to pursue further legal remedies, including filing complaints with the **Florida Department of Financial Services** and taking legal action for violations of my rights as a consumer. \n\nThank you for your attention to this serious matter. I look forward to your prompt response and resolution of this complaint.","date_sent_to_company":"2024-10-23T19:16:15.000Z","issue":"Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"33702","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"10550037","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION","date_received":"2024-10-23T18:58:25.000Z","state":"FL","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Difficulty submitting a dispute or getting information about a dispute over the phone"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["By denying my loan application despite my demonstrated ability to contract, my **right to fair access to <em>credit</em>** has <em>been</em> unlawfully obstructed. \n2. **The Right to Negotiate <em>Terms</em> and Disregard of Lawful Payment Tender** As a consumer, I have the right to **negotiate <em>terms</em>** in any transaction where the proposed <em>terms</em> are not ideal or suitable, as provided under **contract law** principles."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> reporting or other personal consumer reports"],"sub_product":["<em>Credit</em> reporting"]},"sort":[11.049746,"10550037"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"8914295","_score":11.047954,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"I am writing to dispute the recent reporting of an account on my credit report under your company 's name. It has come to my attention that this account, XXXX, was previously reported by your company under a different name over XXXX years ago. \nFirst and foremost, I want to assert that I have never had an account with Stellar Bank, the name under which this account is currently being reported. Therefore, the re-reporting of this account under a different name raises significant concerns regarding the accuracy and legitimacy of the reported information. \nAccording to the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), negative information such as delinquent accounts should be removed from a consumer 's credit report after seven years from the date of the delinquency. It has been brought to my attention that this account has now been re-reported by your company, albeit under a different name, thereby extending the negative impact on my credit report beyond the legally mandated timeframe. \nFurthermore, this practice raises concerns regarding compliance with FCRA guidelines and the accuracy of credit reporting. The re-reporting of the same account under a different name suggests an attempt to circumvent the statute of limitations on credit reporting, which is both unfair and in violation of consumer rights.\n\nI request that you investigate this matter promptly and provide clarification on why this account has been re-reported under a different name after the initial reporting period had elapsed. Additionally, I urge you to cease reporting this account on my credit report and take appropriate steps to rectify any negative impact it may have caused. \nPlease provide written confirmation of the actions taken to address this dispute and ensure that my credit report reflects accurate and fair information in accordance with the FCRA. \nThank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt resolution. \n\n\n\n\nAccount info Account name XXXXXXXX XXXX Account number XXXX Account type Line of Credit Responsibility Individual Date opened XX/XX/XXXX Status Account charged off. {$270.00} written off. \nStatus updated XXXX XXXX Balance {$0.00} Balance updated XX/XX/XXXX Recent payment - Monthly payment - Credit limit {$1000.00} Highest balance {$1000.00} Terms - On record until XX/XX/XXXX Account info Account name STELLAR BANK Account number XXXX Account type Unsecured Responsibility Individual Date opened XX/XX/XXXX Status Open. {$250.00} past due as of XX/XX/XXXX. \nStatus updated XX/XX/XXXX Balance {$160.00} Balance updated XX/XX/XXXX Recent payment - Monthly payment {$0.00} Original balance {$1000.00} Highest balance - Terms-","date_sent_to_company":"2024-05-02T22:09:03.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"759XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"8914295","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"STELLAR BANCORP INC.","date_received":"2024-05-02T22:09:01.000Z","state":"TX","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Old information reappears or never goes away"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["According to the Fair <em>Credit</em> Reporting Act ( FCRA ), negative information such as delinquent accounts should be removed from a consumer 's <em>credit</em> report after seven years from the date of the delinquency. It has <em>been</em> brought to my attention that this account has now <em>been</em> re-reported by your company, albeit under a different name, thereby extending the negative impact on my <em>credit</em> report beyond the legally mandated timeframe."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> reporting or other personal consumer reports"],"sub_product":["<em>Credit</em> reporting"]},"sort":[11.047954,"8914295"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"10550241","_score":11.046607,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"**Subject** : Formal Complaint of Discriminatory Lending Practices and Violation of Consumer Rights **RE : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, FL XXXX **Transaction Date** : XX/XX/year> **Amount Paid** : {$200000.00} **Payment Method** : Credit Car Loan -- - **To the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ), ** I, XXXX XXXX XXXX , respectfully submit this formal complaint regarding the unlawful and discriminatory practices I encountered during my loan application process with XXXX XXXX XXXX. My loan application was denied on the basis of my credit score, despite having demonstrated financial capability and compliance with federal requirements under the **Federal Reserve Act** and contract law.\n\n1. **Discriminatory Lending Practices in Violation of Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( ECOA ) ** XXXX  XXXX XXXX cited my credit score as the sole reason for denying my loan application, stating that my score was \" too low '' and contained \" too many negative entries. '' I believe this denial constitutes **discrimination**, particularly in violation of the **Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( ECOA ) ( 15 U.S.C. 1691 ) **, which prohibits creditors from discriminating based on **age, race, or source of income**. By denying my loan application despite my demonstrated ability to contract, my **right to fair access to credit** has been unlawfully obstructed.\n\n2. **The Right to Negotiate Terms and Disregard of Lawful Payment Tender** As a consumer, I have the right to **negotiate terms** in any transaction where the proposed terms are not ideal or suitable, as provided under **contract law** principles. I demonstrated my willingness and capacity to contract by submitting a valid loan application and accompanying tender. XXXX  XXXX XXXX 's disregard of my lawful tender and application is in direct violation of the **Federal Reserve Act**, specifically **Ch. 16 ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) **, which mandates that financial institutions provide credit without discrimination and consider all lawful tenders. \nFurthermore, my compliance with the Federal Reserve Acts provisions, which govern the handling of credits, highlights my legal capacity and readiness to engage in a valid and enforceable contract. The refusal to process my application despite this compliance reflects a failure to uphold federal regulations governing credit issuance. \n3. **Unfair Trade Practices Under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act ( FDUTPA ) ** XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX actions also constitute a violation of the **Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act ( FDUTPA ) **, **Fla. Stat. 501.204**, which protects consumers from **unfair, deceptive, or discriminatory trade practices**. The denial of my loan application based solely on a credit score is an unfair practice that deprives me of equal access to financial services, violating my **right to be treated fairly** and with equal consideration as mandated by state and federal law. \n4. **Right to Redress and Negotiation in Consumer Transactions** In accordance with **consumer protection principles** and **contract law**, I maintain the **right to redress and the right to negotiate the terms** of any transaction that is not favorable. The refusal to negotiate loan terms based on arbitrary factors such as a credit score, rather than a holistic assessment of my financial capacity, violates my fundamental **right to a fair negotiation** in the credit process. \nBy denying me the opportunity to engage in meaningful negotiation, XXXX  XXXX XXXX has effectively engaged in discriminatory practices that obstruct my **right to receive fair credit terms**. This failure to provide an opportunity to negotiate, despite my capacity and willingness to contract, demonstrates not only a violation of contract principles but also a disregard for the **Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) **, which mandates fairness and transparency in all credit transactions.\n\n5. **Age-Based Discrimination and Violation of Contract Law** My ability to contract is central to the fairness of any transaction, and by denying my loan application based on arbitrary credit score criteria, XXXX XXXX  XXXX has also discriminated against me on the basis of **age**. Age discrimination in the extension of credit is expressly prohibited under **ECOA**, and by evaluating me on an improper basis, XXXX XXXX  XXXX has violated this fundamental protection. \nGiven that I have complied with all legal requirements for submitting a loan application, including the proper **tender of funds** in line with the **Federal Reserve Act**, it is clear that my capacity to contract is valid. Therefore, to deny my loan under these circumstances represents a **breach of contract principles** and an unlawful act of discrimination based on irrelevant factors. \n\nConclusion and Request for Redress As a consumer, I respectfully request that the CFPB conduct a thorough investigation into XXXX  XXXX XXXX 's discriminatory lending practices and their failure to follow federal and state law. I seek the following redress : 1. **Reconsideration of my loan application** with an opportunity to **negotiate terms** based on a comprehensive evaluation of my financial capacity, not arbitrary credit score metrics.\n\n2. **Remediation for the discriminatory practices** that have impacted my ability to secure credit on fair and equitable terms. \n3. A formal review of XXXX  XXXX XXXX adherence to the **Federal Reserve Act**, **Equal Credit Opportunity Act**, and **Florida consumer protection laws** in their lending practices.\n\nShould this matter not be resolved, I reserve my right to pursue further legal remedies, including filing complaints with the **Florida Department of Financial Services** and taking legal action for violations of my rights as a consumer. \n\nThank you for your attention to this serious matter. I look forward to your prompt response and resolution of this complaint.","date_sent_to_company":"2024-10-23T19:16:40.000Z","issue":"Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"33702","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"10550241","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Experian Information Solutions Inc.","date_received":"2024-10-23T19:16:27.000Z","state":"FL","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Difficulty submitting a dispute or getting information about a dispute over the phone"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["By denying my loan application despite my demonstrated ability to contract, my **right to fair access to <em>credit</em>** has <em>been</em> unlawfully obstructed.\n\n2. **The Right to Negotiate <em>Terms</em> and Disregard of Lawful Payment Tender** As a consumer, I have the right to **negotiate <em>terms</em>** in any transaction where the proposed <em>terms</em> are not ideal or suitable, as provided under **contract law** principles."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> reporting or other personal consumer reports"],"sub_product":["<em>Credit</em> reporting"]},"sort":[11.046607,"10550241"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"11203237","_score":10.93707,"_source":{"product":"Checking or savings account","complaint_what_happened":"XX/XX/year> Re : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, UT XXXX. \n\nIssue : Violation of Regulation Z ( peer-to-peer-transaction ) Amount : {$3200.00} Account last ( XXXX ) # XXXX _________________________________________________________ XXXX XXXX XXXX, Plaintiff in XXXX XXXX XXXX, and files this Motion regarding the illegal eviction, fraudulent lease, and damages arising from the actions of Defendant XXXX XXXX and Americas XXXX XXXX XXXX, and XXXX shows this XXXX XXXX XXXX follows : I. STATEMENT OF FACTS XXXX. Scam Origin : On or around XX/XX/year>, Plaintiff discovered the rental property located at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX  XXXX advertised on XXXX. Plaintiff contacted the advertiser and pursued the property for rent. \nXXXX. Payment Made : XXXX paid a total/approx. : of {$3200.00} for the rental, believing the transaction was legitimate. \nXXXX. XXXX XXXX : XXXX entered into a fraudulent lease agreement, which was later determined to be part of a rental scam. \nXXXX. XXXX to XXXX : XXXX gained access to the property through a XXXX lockbox, as directed by the fraudulent lease agreement. \nXXXX. Defendants Actions : Upon contacting Rently for assistance, Plaintiff received an email from XXXX XXXX, identifying himself as the property XXXX for XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Plaintiff was the victim of a scam and subsequently : Changed the locks on the property without providing legal notice or obtaining a court order. \nTerminated utilities, rendering the property uninhabitable. \nXXXX. Illegal Eviction : XXXX XXXX, acting as the property manager, failed to adhere to Georgia law regarding eviction procedures, including : Filing a dispossessory action in court. \nProviding proper notice or allowing Plaintiff to recover their belongings. \nXXXX. Damages : As a result of these actions, Plaintiff has suffered the following damages : Loss of personal property, including [ food, clothing, personal items etc. ], with a total value exceeding {$5000.00}. \nEmotional distress, including XXXX palpitations requiring an emergency room visit. \nFinancial loss of {$3200.00} in payments made toward the fraudulent lease. \n\nXXXX. LEGAL ARGUMENTS XXXX. Violation of XXXX. XXXX : Georgia law prohibits self-help evictions. Defendants failed to follow the required court-ordered process for eviction, including filing a dispossessory action and obtaining a writ of possession. \nXXXX. Fraudulent Representation : Defendant XXXX XXXX, acting as an agent of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, perpetuated the effects of the rental scam by changing the locks and shutting off utilities without due process. \nXXXX. Negligence : Defendants failed to exercise reasonable care in managing the property and safeguarding it from fraudulent use, resulting in harm to XXXX. \nXXXX. Breach of Quiet Enjoyment : Plaintiffs right to peaceful possession of the property was violated by Defendants illegal actions, including the lock change and utility shutoff. \n\nComplaint If a bank or financial institution is conducting an investigation into a Regulation Z defense, it means they are likely reviewing whether their actions or practices ( such as disclosures, advertising, loan agreements, etc. ) are in compliance with Regulation Z ( which implements the Truth in Lending Act ). Regulation Z requires lenders to provide clear and accurate information about credit terms and costs to consumers. When a bank or lender is facing a complaint or potential legal issue related to Regulation Z, they may conduct a defense investigation to ensure they are in compliance or to dispute allegations of non-compliance. \n\nHere 's an outline of how a Regulation Z defense investigation by a bank might proceed : XXXX. Identify the Issue or Complaint Complaint Initiation : The investigation often begins when a consumer files a complaint or the bank is alerted to a possible violation of Regulation Z, often through agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ), a state attorney generals office, or even litigation. \nNature of the Complaint : Common issues may involve the accuracy or timeliness of disclosures ( e.g., XXXX, loan terms ), failure to disclose certain fees, or incorrect or misleading advertisements. \nXXXX. Examine Relevant Documentation Review Loan Agreements : The bank will first examine all relevant loan documentation, including : The Truth in Lending Disclosure Statement ( or similar documents ), which must clearly state the terms and costs of the loan. \nCredit card agreements, mortgage documents, or any other applicable lending documents. \nReview Disclosure Timing : Regulation Z requires that disclosures be made in a timely manner. For example, certain disclosures must be given within XXXX business days of applying for a mortgage or at the time of a credit card offer. \nAdvertising and Marketing Materials : If the complaint involves misleading advertising, the bank will investigate whether any marketing materials or advertisements violated Regulation Z by failing to disclose required terms ( e.g., APR, fees ). \nXXXX. Check Compliance with Regulation Z Provisions Regulation Z covers several specific areas : APR Disclosure : Ensure the correct Annual Percentage Rate ( APR ) is disclosed on loan documents, advertisements, and credit offers. \nFees and Costs : All costs associated with obtaining credit ( fees, insurance, penalties, etc. ) must be disclosed. The bank will assess whether all fees were accurately disclosed to the consumer. \nRight of Rescission ( for certain mortgages ) : Under Regulation Z, certain loans, like home equity loans or refinances, require a right of rescission, meaning the consumer can cancel the loan within XXXX business days after closing. The bank will check whether this right was properly communicated and if the consumer was informed about it. \nAccuracy of Terms : The investigation will include verifying that the disclosed loan terms ( e.g., interest rate, repayment schedule, penalties ) match the actual loan agreement. \nTiming of Disclosures : The bank will ensure that disclosures were provided at the required times and that the consumer had sufficient time to review and understand the terms. \nXXXX. Assess the Specific Allegations The banks legal and compliance teams will analyze the specific allegations made in the complaint or legal action. Common defense strategies might involve : Substantiating Compliance : If the bank can demonstrate that they provided clear, accurate, and timely disclosures in line with Regulation Z, they may argue that the complaint is invalid. \nCure and Mitigation : In some cases, if a violation is found, the bank may attempt to correct the error ( e.g., issuing corrected disclosures, reimbursing fees, etc. ) to resolve the issue and prevent further legal or regulatory action.\n\nDispute the Facts : The bank may argue that the consumer 's claim is inaccurate or based on a misunderstanding of the law or the loan terms. For example, they may argue that certain fees were disclosed properly or that the consumer had the right to cancel or rescind a loan, but failed to do so within the required time. \nXXXX. Consult Legal and Regulatory Guidelines Regulation Z Defenses : In preparing a defense, the bank will consult relevant legal precedents, interpretations of Regulation Z, and past enforcement actions by the CFPB or Federal Reserve. The bank may rely on established compliance practices to demonstrate that it followed Regulation Z 's requirements.\n\nRegulatory Guidance : If the complaint is about a specific type of loan ( e.g., mortgage, credit card, or auto loan ), the bank may consult specific regulatory guidance issued by the CFPB or other agencies to ensure its practices align with the law. \nXXXX. Prepare a Response To the Consumer : If the investigation finds that the bank acted in accordance with Regulation Z, the bank will draft a formal response to the consumer or regulatory agency, explaining why their practices were compliant. \nTo Regulators or Courts : If the matter escalates, the bank may need to respond to regulators ( such as the CFPB ) or defend itself in court. This response will likely include a detailed analysis of how the bank adhered to Regulation Z and its defenses against the specific allegations. \nXXXX. Take Corrective Action ( if needed ) If a Violation is Found : If the investigation uncovers that the bank did indeed violate Regulation Z, it may be required to : Correct disclosures : Provide corrected disclosures to the affected consumers.\n\nRefund fees : Reimburse any improperly charged fees or penalties.\n\nStrengthen procedures : The bank may improve internal processes to prevent future violations ( e.g., more stringent checks for compliance with disclosure requirements ). \nPenalties and Fines : Depending on the severity of the violation, the bank may face penalties or fines from regulatory agencies. \nXXXX. Resolve the Complaint or Legal Action Negotiation or Settlement : If a violation is found, the bank may negotiate with the consumer or regulatory authorities to reach a settlement, avoiding more significant penalties or litigation. \nRegulatory Action : If the issue isnt resolved voluntarily, the bank may face enforcement action by the CFPB, Federal Reserve, or other regulatory bodies. This could involve fines, public sanctions, or other legal consequences. \nKey Points in a Regulation Z Defense Investigation : Documentation : The bank must thoroughly review all relevant documents to ensure they comply with Regulation Z requirements. \nCompliance Verification : The bank will assess whether it met the disclosure and timing requirements of Regulation Z.\n\nMitigation : If violations are found, the bank may correct the issue, refund fees, or take other steps to resolve the matter. \nDefending Practices : If the bank believes it complied with Regulation Z, it will present a detailed defense demonstrating its compliance. \nUltimately, the goal of the Regulation Z defense investigation by a bank is to verify whether the institution complied with the necessary disclosure and lending practices or to resolve any discrepancies with a customer or regulatory body. \n\nSummary : Sofi Bank failed to credit a customer in accordance with Regulation Z, which is part of the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ). This regulation requires financial institutions to provide clear and accurate disclosures to consumers about loan terms, including accurate crediting practices, interest rates, and fees. The bank did not properly credit the customers account as required under the regulation, potentially leading to financial harm or incorrect loan terms being applied. \n\nMoreover, Sofi Bank did not conduct a thorough investigation into the issue. This lack of investigation prevented a proper review of whether the crediting issue violated the disclosure requirements under Regulation Z, leaving the customer potentially unaware of their rights or the banks failure to meet regulatory obligations. \n\nAs a result, the customer may have experienced undue charges or discrepancies in their account, which could have been avoided if Sofi Bank had followed proper procedures and performed a comprehensive review of the issue. \n\nSummary : Sofi Bank failed to credit a customer in accordance with Regulation Z, which is part of the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ). This regulation requires financial institutions to provide clear and accurate disclosures to consumers about loan terms, including accurate crediting practices, interest rates, and fees. The bank did not properly credit the customers account as required under the regulation, potentially leading to financial harm or incorrect loan terms being applied. \n\nMoreover, Sofi Bank did not conduct a thorough investigation into the issue. This lack of investigation prevented a proper review of whether the crediting issue violated the disclosure requirements under Regulation Z, leaving the customer potentially unaware of their rights or the banks failure to meet regulatory obligations. \n\nAs a result, the customer may have experienced undue charges or discrepancies in their account, which could have been avoided if Sofi Bank had followed proper procedures and performed a comprehensive review of the issue. \n\nInjury Sofi Bank failed to credit a customer in accordance with Regulation Z of the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ), resulting in an injury of {$3200.00} to the customer. Regulation Z requires that financial institutions properly credit customer accounts, provide accurate disclosures regarding interest rates, fees, and repayment terms, and ensure proper handling of all financial transactions. \n\nIn this case, Sofi Bank did not credit the customer 's account correctly, leading to an incorrect balance or potential fees that were not disclosed properly. Despite this issue, Sofi Bank did not conduct a thorough investigation into the situation to assess whether the error violated Regulation Z 's requirements. The failure to investigate and address the issue caused financial harm to the customer, amounting to {$3200.00} in damages.\n\nThe customer may have suffered from improper fees or interest charges, or their credit terms may have been inaccurately applied, leading to a financial loss. Sofi Banks lack of compliance with Regulation Z and failure to thoroughly investigate the issue exacerbated the injury.","date_sent_to_company":"2024-12-18T23:45:09.000Z","issue":"Managing an account","sub_product":"Checking account","zip_code":"XXXXX","tags":"Servicemember","has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"11203237","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"SOFI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.","date_received":"2024-12-18T23:08:32.000Z","state":"GA","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Funds not handled or disbursed as instructed"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["The customer may have suffered from improper fees or interest charges, or their <em>credit</em> <em>terms</em> may have <em>been</em> inaccurately applied, leading to a financial loss. Sofi Banks lack of <em>compliance</em> with Regulation Z and failure to thoroughly investigate the issue exacerbated the injury."]},"sort":[10.93707,"11203237"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"13100575","_score":10.8035,"_source":{"product":"Money transfer, virtual currency, or money service","complaint_what_happened":"XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Regarding what appears to be RobinHood Misinformation provided to a customer & regulatory compliance agency on XX/XX/XXXX CFPB XXXX / Robinhood Compliance Case ID : XXXX On XX/XX/XXXX Robinhood wrote XXXX the Firm has made the decision to grant you the full bonus value in the amount of {$6700.00}. This has been added to your account as a goodwill credit and is already available in your account as cash. The Firm will also waive the account transfer fee as long as you initiate an account transfer by XX/XX/XXXX. Since the terms of the promotion were not met, you will see a debit of {$6700.00} when your account is transferred, but this debit will be offset by the goodwill funds of the same amount that have been credited to you. \n\nHowever, I currently have a {$0.00} balance. There is no Record off the goodwill credit in the online Robinhood history listing.\n\nThe Robinhood activity report for my entire account up to XX/XX/XXXX shows : Amount : XXXX / Description : XXXX XXXX XXXX. / XXXX XXXX : XXXX. \nImmediately followed by : Amount : ( XXXX ) { a negative debit taken from my account } / Description : Bonus Interest Charge as of XX/XX/XXXX. Trans Code : BIR Robinhoods letter states, the Firm has made the decision to grant you the full bonus value in the amount of {$6700.00}. This has been added to your account as a goodwill credit and is already available in your account as cash. The Firm will also waive the account transfer fee as long as you initiate an account transfer by XX/XX/XXXX. Since the terms of the promotion were not met, you will see a debit of {$6700.00} when your account is transferred, but this debit will be offset by the goodwill funds of the same amount that have been credited to you. \n\nI have yet to set up the ACAT out, and according to what Robinhood wrote, Robinhood would not debit the {$6700.00} until I initiated ACAT, instead, now when I initiate the ACAT it will result in a debit of {$6700.00}, making my account negative {$6700.00}, instead of the {$0.00} balance promised by Robinhood.\n\nI did not authorize Robinhood to implement a debit of {$6700.00} to be removed from my account. Which also appears to be hidden from Robinhoods history section of website. It appears, I presently can not initiate the ACAT until the misinformation is corrected.\n\nGiven I am unable to contact anyone at Robinhood by phone or chat, I have no way to get a timely response to this inquiry.\n\nCan you please help me get answers and results, instead of what appear to be broken promises made by Robinhood. \n\n1. Why did Robinhood debit my account on XX/XX/XXXX an amount of XXXX? \na. What does BIR mean? \nb. Can Robinhood reverse this debit, such that it never occurred. \ni. Another seemingly solution would be to deposit another XXXX in my account, but this would result in my paying taxes XXXX times on the same funds only provided once. \n2. Can Robinhood extend the waiver for the ACAT fee until XXXX  days from point where Robinhood has met their documented promises without any additional negative actions taken against my account ( like the unauthorized debit of {$6700.00} on XX/XX/XXXX ). \n3. Can Robinhood remove the restriction from my account so I can initiate a chat for inquiry as to why Robinhood provided what appears to be misinformation?\n\n4. Can Robinhood provide me a dedicated POC with a dedicated phone line I can call to work this issue such that Robinhood can keep its written promise of the goodwill credit of {$6700.00} ( without an offsetting debit of {$6700.00} on XX/XX/XXXX ). \n5. Can Robinhood provide me a dedicated POC with a dedicated phone line I can call to work this issue such that Robinhood can keep its written promise of the waiving the ACAT fee.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-05-01T21:20:53.000Z","issue":"Fraud or scam","sub_product":"Domestic (US) money transfer","zip_code":"325XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"13100575","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"ROBINHOOD MARKETS INC.","date_received":"2025-04-21T13:34:17.000Z","state":"FL","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":null},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["This has <em>been</em> added to your account as a goodwill <em>credit</em> and is already available in your account as cash. The Firm will also waive the account transfer fee as long as you initiate an account transfer by XX/XX/XXXX. Since the <em>terms</em> of the promotion were not met, you will see a debit of {$6700.00} when your account is transferred, but this debit will be offset by the goodwill funds of the same amount that have <em>been</em> <em>credited</em> to you."]},"sort":[10.8035,"13100575"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"7560580","_score":10.776705,"_source":{"product":"Credit card","complaint_what_happened":"Dear Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the recent denial of my credit application and to seek clarification on certain matters pertaining to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( ECOA ). \n\nFirstly, I would like to clarify that I understand Navy Federal Credit Unions right to assess credit applications based on established criteria. However, I know there might be a misunderstanding regarding the nature of my credit application. \n\nI wish to highlight that I have an open-ended credit line associated with my social security number. This credit line represents a credit relationship that I have established and maintained over time. As the CARDHOLDER, I utilize my social security number as the basis for these credit transactions. According to ( Section 15 USC 1681a, subsection 1, ) which defines the term credit, it includes the RIGHT granted by a creditor to defer payment of debt or to incur debt and defer its payment. Additionally, the definition of a credit card in ( SECTION 15 USC 1681a Subsection 3, ) encompasses any card, plate, coupon book, or other single credit device that may be used from time to time to obtain money, property, labor, or services on credit. \n\n( Section 15 USC 1681a, subsection k, ) defines adverse action as a denial or revocation of credit, a change in the terms of an existing credit arrangement, or a refusal to grant credit in the amount or on the terms requested. \n\nFurthermore, as it relates to my credit denial, I received an adverse action letter as required by law. This adverse action was Adverse to the interest of the consumer, as my interest was in applying for credit cards, securing credit lines, and obtaining loans to support various financial needs and goals. \n\nI also want to bring to your attention ( Section 15 USC 1691a, subsection 3 ) which outlines the exercise of the rights of a consumer in good faith. I have diligently exercised my RIGHTS as a consumer in good faith by applying for credit based on my established credit line associated with my social security number. Despite this exercise in good faith, I have faced credit denial, which raises concerns about compliance with the ECOA.\n\n( 15 USC 1691a ) defines discrimination as a denial of credit to an applicant who is a married applicant or a joint applicant, because of the applicants or joint applicants sex or marital status. It is essential to uphold the principles of non-discrimination as outlined in this section.\n\nFurthermore, it is with deep concern that I address the matter of potential discrimination. I have made multiple attempts to exercise my fundamental RIGHT to access credit, a right that is safeguarded by the ECOA. However, despite my genuine efforts and a well-established credit history associated with my social security number, I have been met with credit denials. This pattern of denials raises concerns about the possibility of discrimination, as outlined in ( Section 15 USC 1691a ) which prohibits a denial of credit based on certain factors such as sex or marital status.\n\nI believe it is essential to ensure that all credit applications are evaluated without prejudice and in strict adherence to the principles of fairness and equality enshrined in the law. I would appreciate clarification on whether it is within the legal framework of the ECOA to deny credit to me, the primary account holder, when I am utilizing my own social security number for credit transactions. If there are specific reasons for my credit denial, I kindly request that those reasons be communicated to me in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.\n\nI value my relationship with Navy Federal Credit Union and want to ensure that all credit-related matters are handled fairly and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. I am open to discussing this matter further and finding a resolution that aligns with the legal requirements.\n\nThank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response and a constructive dialogue. \n\nSincerely, XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2023-09-16T17:04:08.000Z","issue":"Getting a credit card","sub_product":"General-purpose credit card or charge card","zip_code":"11207","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"7560580","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION","date_received":"2023-09-16T16:49:37.000Z","state":"NY","company_public_response":"Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law","sub_issue":"Application denied"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I have diligently exercised my RIGHTS as a consumer in good faith by applying for <em>credit</em> based on my established <em>credit</em> <em>line</em> associated with my social security number. Despite this exercise in good faith, I have faced <em>credit</em> denial, which raises concerns about <em>compliance</em> with the ECOA.\n\n( 15 USC 1691a ) defines discrimination as a denial of <em>credit</em> to an applicant who is a married applicant or a joint applicant, because of the applicants or joint applicants sex or marital status."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> card"],"issue":["Getting a <em>credit</em> card"],"company":["NAVY FEDERAL <em>CREDIT</em> UNION"],"sub_product":["General-purpose <em>credit</em> card or charge card"]},"sort":[10.776705,"7560580"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"10632331","_score":10.607412,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"Your company has reported me late to all three credit bureaus. When I checked my credit reports, I noticed the late status. I disputed this with the credit bureaus, and your company verified it. I dont recall being late. Please provide me with all documentation that you have proving that I was late on the days that you reported to the credit bureaus. \n\nAccording to the FCRA and FACTA, I have a right to dispute this account directly with your company if I feel that your reporting is inaccurate. In addition, court case opinion No. XXXX XXXX by the XXXX Court of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX investigate and make sure their reporting is accurate. I also have the right to bring a suit against your company if you violate any of the laws above. \n\nAccount name ADS/COMENITY/VICTORIA Account number XXXX Account type Charge Card Responsibility Individual Date opened XX/XX/XXXX Status Open. \nStatus updated XX/XX/XXXX Balance {$0.00} Balance updated XX/XX/XXXX Recent payment - Monthly payment {$0.00} Credit limit {$550.00} Highest balance {$140.00} Terms - Payment history Late payment XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX Report Number XXXX false reporting ... i was never late and the representative told me on the recorded phone line that the account will be updated immediately. \n\nViolations of Metro 2 Compliance Standards Under the Metro 2 compliance standards, established by the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ), XXXX Funding is required to report information accurately, consistently, and in compliance with consumer protection guidelines. This account has been inaccurately reported and has violated several Metro 2 codes as outlined below : Metro 2 Compliance Incorrect Account Status and Balance Reporting Violation of Compliance Code ( Base Segment Account Status ) : Metro 2 standards require that the Account Status Code accurately reflect the current status of the debt, including any charge-off, paid, or zero balance if canceled. As the balance and past-due amounts of {$38000.00} remain on record without validation, this reporting fails Metro 2 standards.\n\nMetro 2 Compliance Code for Base Segment ( Field 17 Account Status Code ) requires that the status accurately reflects the true condition of the account. Reporting a balance that is potentially inaccurate and unverifiable violates this compliance. \nNotice of Demand for Deletion and Intent to Seek Statutory Damages XXXX Fundings repeated failure to meet Metro 2 compliance standards, the FDCPA, and federal privacy regulations has caused substantial financial and emotional harm. This letter serves as a formal demand for the immediate deletion of this account from my credit report. Failure to comply will result in legal action, including arbitration, to pursue statutory damages as outlined below : FDCPA Statutory Damages : {$1000.00} Privacy Invasion and Data Misuse Damages : {$5000.00} Additional Damages for Emotional and Financial Harm : {$3000.00} Total Damages Sought : {$9000.00} Opt-Out of Information Sharing In accordance with 15 U.S.C. 6802, I am opting out of any further sharing of my personal information, including my Social Security Number, and demand that XXXX XXXX ceases all reporting activity associated with this unauthorized and inaccurate account. Your continued reporting is an actionable breach of my rights.","date_sent_to_company":"2024-10-30T19:54:54.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"33169","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"10632331","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.","date_received":"2024-10-30T19:25:32.000Z","state":"FL","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Account status incorrect"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Status updated XX/XX/XXXX Balance {$0.00} Balance updated XX/XX/XXXX Recent payment - Monthly payment {$0.00} <em>Credit</em> limit {$550.00} Highest balance {$140.00} <em>Terms</em> - Payment history Late payment XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX Report Number XXXX false reporting ... i was never late and the representative told me on the recorded phone <em>line</em> that the account will be updated immediately."],"product":["<em>Credit</em> reporting or other personal consumer reports"],"sub_product":["<em>Credit</em> reporting"]},"sort":[10.607412,"10632331"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"5196795","_score":10.582084,"_source":{"product":"Checking or savings account","complaint_what_happened":"I opened a one-year certificate of deposit with Lending Club on XX/XX/XXXX for {$24000.00} that matured on XX/XX/XXXX. A couple of weeks prior to the maturity date, I instructed the bank to upon maturity deposit the balance of the certificate of deposit ( which would be principal plus accumulated interest ) into my checking account. On XX/XX/XXXX, the bank deposited the original principal of the CD into my checking account, but did not credit the interest. ( Based on the CD 's rate, I was expecting an additional {$120.00}. ) I first notified the bank of this on the evening of XX/XX/XXXX by phone to the Lending Club customer service line. I was told that the bank personnel who could address this issue were not available after XXXX XXXX  but that my concern would be addressed on the next business day. There was no action, so I called again on the evening of XX/XX/XXXX. Again I was told that no one was immediately available to address this, but the issue would be investigated and resolved. \n\nBut by XX/XX/XXXX it had not been. I called Lending Club customer service again ; this time around XXXX XXXX. Eastern, while bank staff would be available. I asked to speak specifically to a supervisor with authority to expedite paying the interest due on this account. Unfortunately, I neglected to get the person 's name. But I was assured that the issue would be addressed by the end of the daythat \" the interest could be credited manually. '' However, at the close of the banking day, that had not been done. \n\nI am putting this matter on record with a request that the CFPB take action to require full interest payment. This should be unnecessary ; payment of interest on CDs and savings account is a routine banking actionapparently so routine that I can not readily find a reference on the internet to what the recourse would be if a bank does not pay a depositor interest due on an account when the depositor is in compliance with its terms of service. It apparently almost never happensuntil now.","date_sent_to_company":"2022-02-08T07:54:16.000Z","issue":"Closing an account","sub_product":"CD (Certificate of Deposit)","zip_code":"20017","tags":"Older American","has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"5196795","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Lending Club Corp","date_received":"2022-02-08T01:33:44.000Z","state":"DC","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Funds not received from closed account"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["This should be unnecessary ; payment of interest on CDs and savings account is a routine banking actionapparently so routine that I can not readily find a reference on the internet to what the recourse would be if a bank does not pay a depositor interest due on an account when the depositor is in <em>compliance</em> with its <em>terms</em> of service. It apparently almost never happensuntil now."]},"sort":[10.582084,"5196795"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"8445738","_score":10.425294,"_source":{"product":"Payday loan, title loan, personal loan, or advance loan","complaint_what_happened":"I am writing to file a formal complaint against Upgrade , Inc. regarding my Upgrade OneCard Personal Credit Line account ( Account Number # XXXX. This complaint outlines numerous unresolved ongoing issues since XX/XX/year> that warrant your immediate attention and potential investigation. Additionally, a notarized affidavit detailing my grievances and supporting evidence is attached to this complaint. \nUnresolved Disputes and Concerns : Unwarranted Credit Line Reductions : My credit line has been reduced multiple times despite a consistent history of on-time payments. This lack of justification and transparency may violate the Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( ECOA ) ( 15 U.S.C. 1691 et seq. ) by failing to provide specific reasons for adverse actions. \nUnanswered Questions Regarding Power of Attorney : I haven't received any documentation signed under the Power of Attorney associated with my account, raising concerns about potential unauthorized activity. Under the California Probate Code ( Sections 4000-4545 ), I am entitled to access these documents.The documents I have on hand are Incomplete, lacking signatures questioning their validity, and I hereby request all relevant documents, complete with signatures from all parties involved. This includes the original credit line application, all promissory notes, and any other agreements or disclosures related to my account. As well as the Application that was submitted on Upgrades online dashboard on XX/XX/year> for a personal loan that I DID NOT SUBMIT. Which further raises my concerns that my Identity and name is being used without my consent and that documents are being improperly executed in my name. \nTrue Nature of the Account : Ambiguity exists regarding whether my account is a true revolving line of credit or an installment loan. I request clarification on the true nature of the account and proper disclosures of the credit terms under the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) ( 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq. ).\n\nDismissive Response and Inaccurate Reporting : Upgrade 's dismissive response to my previous disputes and potentially inaccurate reporting to credit bureaus may constitute a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) ( 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. ). \nUnclear Records and Transactions : The records and transaction history provided by Upgrade are confusing and contradictory. I request a detailed breakdown of all draws, payments, and reversals to resolve these discrepancies. \nCredit Reporting Concerns : Furthermore, concerns exist regarding the impact of the credit line reduction on my creditworthiness, potentially lowering my score due to a balance exceeding the new limit of {$1000.00}. This action is a punitive measure taken by Upgrade, particularly in response to exercising my rights to dispute errors and seek information, suggests potential violations of the FCRA and constitutes retaliatory action. Restricting my access to funds. \nRequest for Review and Investigation : I request the CFPB to review this complaint and conduct a thorough investigation into Upgrade 's practices, particularly regarding the potential violations of : Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( ECOA ) Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) Supporting Evidence : A notarized affidavit detailing my grievances is attached. \nThe CFPB 's complaint database reveals over XXXX complaints against Upgrade, many alleging similar issues. This pattern of complaints suggests systemic issues within Upgrade 's practices that warrant further review for compliance with TILA, ECOA, and other consumer protection laws. Due to Upgrade 's persistent lack of transparency and ineffective communication, I have temporarily ceased further payments. I reserve the right to escalate this matter to regulatory agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ), for potential violations of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( ECOA ), the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ), and the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ).","date_sent_to_company":"2024-03-01T03:59:36.000Z","issue":"Credit limit changed","sub_product":"Personal line of credit","zip_code":"90731","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"8445738","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"UPGRADE, INC.","date_received":"2024-03-01T01:30:34.000Z","state":"CA","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":null},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Unresolved Disputes and Concerns : Unwarranted <em>Credit</em> <em>Line</em> Reductions : My <em>credit</em> <em>line</em> has <em>been</em> reduced multiple times despite a consistent history of on-time payments. This lack of justification and transparency may violate the Equal <em>Credit</em> Opportunity Act ( ECOA ) ( 15 U.S.C. 1691 et seq. ) by failing to provide specific reasons for adverse actions."],"issue":["<em>Credit</em> limit changed"],"sub_product":["Personal <em>line</em> of <em>credit</em>"]},"sort":[10.425294,"8445738"]}]},"aggregations":{"has_narrative":{"meta":{},"doc_count":341,"has_narrative":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":1,"key_as_string":"true","doc_count":341}]}},"product":{"doc_count":341,"product":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","doc_count":94,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit reporting","doc_count":91},{"key":"Other personal consumer report","doc_count":3}]}},{"key":"Debt collection","doc_count":88,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit card debt","doc_count":49},{"key":"I do not know","doc_count":10},{"key":"Auto debt","doc_count":8},{"key":"Mortgage debt","doc_count":7},{"key":"Other debt","doc_count":5},{"key":"Federal student loan debt","doc_count":4},{"key":"Medical debt","doc_count":2},{"key":"Payday loan debt","doc_count":1},{"key":"Private student loan debt","doc_count":1},{"key":"Rental debt","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports","doc_count":45,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit reporting","doc_count":45}]}},{"key":"Mortgage","doc_count":37,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Conventional home mortgage","doc_count":15},{"key":"Home equity loan or line of credit (HELOC)","doc_count":10},{"key":"FHA mortgage","doc_count":7},{"key":"Home equity loan or line of credit","doc_count":2},{"key":"Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)","doc_count":1},{"key":"Reverse mortgage","doc_count":1},{"key":"VA mortgage","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Credit card","doc_count":21,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"General-purpose credit card or charge card","doc_count":20},{"key":"Store credit card","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Checking or savings account","doc_count":15,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Checking account","doc_count":11},{"key":"Other banking product or service","doc_count":3},{"key":"CD (Certificate of Deposit)","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Credit card or prepaid card","doc_count":11,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"General-purpose credit card or charge card","doc_count":8},{"key":"Store credit card","doc_count":3}]}},{"key":"Vehicle loan or lease","doc_count":9,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Loan","doc_count":7},{"key":"Lease","doc_count":2}]}},{"key":"Money transfer, virtual currency, or money service","doc_count":6,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Domestic (US) money transfer","doc_count":3},{"key":"International money transfer","doc_count":1},{"key":"Mobile or digital wallet","doc_count":1},{"key":"Virtual currency","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Payday loan, title loan, or personal loan","doc_count":5,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Installment loan","doc_count":2},{"key":"Payday loan","doc_count":2},{"key":"Personal line of credit","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Payday loan, title loan, personal loan, or advance loan","doc_count":4,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Personal line of credit","doc_count":3},{"key":"Payday loan","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Prepaid card","doc_count":2,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"General-purpose prepaid card","doc_count":1},{"key":"Government benefit card","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Student loan","doc_count":2,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Federal student loan servicing","doc_count":1},{"key":"Private student loan","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Credit reporting","doc_count":1,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Debt or credit management","doc_count":1,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Debt settlement","doc_count":1}]}}]}},"issue":{"doc_count":341,"issue":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Incorrect information on your report","doc_count":62,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Account information incorrect","doc_count":23},{"key":"Account status incorrect","doc_count":20},{"key":"Information belongs to someone else","doc_count":14},{"key":"Information is missing that should be on the report","doc_count":3},{"key":"Old information reappears or never goes away","doc_count":2}]}},{"key":"Written notification about debt","doc_count":56,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Didn't receive enough information to verify debt","doc_count":51},{"key":"Didn't receive notice of right to dispute","doc_count":5}]}},{"key":"Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem","doc_count":29,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Their investigation did not fix an error on your report","doc_count":18},{"key":"Was not notified of investigation status or results","doc_count":7},{"key":"Difficulty submitting a dispute or getting information about a dispute over the phone","doc_count":2},{"key":"Investigation took more than 30 days","doc_count":1},{"key":"Problem with personal statement of dispute","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Improper use of your report","doc_count":28,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Reporting company used your report improperly","doc_count":24},{"key":"Credit inquiries on your report that you don't recognize","doc_count":4}]}},{"key":"Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem","doc_count":19,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Their investigation did not fix an error on your report","doc_count":12},{"key":"Was not notified of investigation status or results","doc_count":4},{"key":"Difficulty submitting a dispute or getting information about a dispute over the phone","doc_count":2},{"key":"Investigation took more than 30 days","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Attempts to collect debt not owed","doc_count":18,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Debt is not yours","doc_count":11},{"key":"Debt was paid","doc_count":4},{"key":"Debt was result of identity theft","doc_count":3}]}},{"key":"Trouble during payment process","doc_count":11,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Trying to communicate with the company to fix an issue while managing or servicing your loan","doc_count":3},{"key":"Escrow, taxes, or insurance","doc_count":1},{"key":"Payment process","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Struggling to pay mortgage","doc_count":10,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Foreclosure","doc_count":4}]}},{"key":"Managing an account","doc_count":9,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Deposits and withdrawals","doc_count":3},{"key":"Problem accessing account","doc_count":3},{"key":"Banking errors","doc_count":2},{"key":"Funds not handled or disbursed as instructed","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Closing on a mortgage","doc_count":8,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Closing disclosure or other related disclosures","doc_count":3}]}},{"key":"Closing your account","doc_count":8,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Company closed your account","doc_count":8}]}},{"key":"False statements or representation","doc_count":7,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Attempted to collect wrong amount","doc_count":6},{"key":"Told you not to respond to a lawsuit they filed against you","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Took or threatened to take negative or legal action","doc_count":7,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Seized or attempted to seize your property","doc_count":4},{"key":"Threatened or suggested your credit would be damaged","doc_count":2},{"key":"Collected or attempted to collect exempt funds","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Applying for a mortgage or refinancing an existing mortgage","doc_count":5,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Changes in loan terms during the application process","doc_count":1},{"key":"Negative impact of inaccurate appraisal","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Fraud or scam","doc_count":5,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Other features, terms, or problems","doc_count":5,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Other problem","doc_count":3},{"key":"Problem with cash advances","doc_count":1},{"key":"Problem with customer service","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Advertising and marketing, including promotional offers","doc_count":4,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Confusing or misleading advertising about the credit card","doc_count":3},{"key":"Didn't receive advertised or promotional terms","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Closing an account","doc_count":3,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Funds not received from closed account","doc_count":2},{"key":"Company closed your account","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Credit monitoring or identity theft protection services","doc_count":3,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Didn't receive services that were advertised","doc_count":3}]}},{"key":"Getting a credit card","doc_count":3,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Application denied","doc_count":3}]}},{"key":"Problem when making payments","doc_count":3,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Problem during payment process","doc_count":1},{"key":"You never received your bill or did not know a payment was due","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Problem with a lender or other company charging your account","doc_count":3,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Transaction was not authorized","doc_count":3}]}},{"key":"Problem with a purchase shown on your statement","doc_count":3,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit card company isn't resolving a dispute about a purchase on your statement","doc_count":2},{"key":"Card was charged for something you did not purchase with the card","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Repossession","doc_count":3,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Account reinstatement or redemption after repossession","doc_count":1},{"key":"Company explaining amount owed","doc_count":1},{"key":"Notice to repossess","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Trouble using your card","doc_count":3,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit card company won't increase or decrease your credit limit","doc_count":2},{"key":"Can't use card to make purchases","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Can't contact lender or servicer","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Charged fees or interest you didn't expect","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Fees or interest","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Problem with fees","doc_count":2}]}},{"key":"Getting a line of credit","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Getting a loan or lease","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Changes in terms mid-deal or after closing","doc_count":1},{"key":"Fraudulent loan","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Loan modification,collection,foreclosure","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Managing the loan or lease","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Loan sold or transferred to another company","doc_count":1},{"key":"Problem with additional products or services purchased with the loan","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Struggling to pay your loan","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Lender trying to repossess or disable the vehicle","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Confusing or missing disclosures","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Credit limit changed","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Dealing with your lender or servicer","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Trouble with how payments are being handled","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Incorrect information on credit report","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Account status","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Loan servicing, payments, escrow account","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Problem with a company's investigation into an existing issue","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Investigation took more than 30 days","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Problem with a purchase or transfer","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Card company isn't resolving a dispute about a purchase or transfer","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Problem with overdraft","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Overdraft charges","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Problems at the end of the loan or lease","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Problem related to refinancing","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Unauthorized withdrawals or charges","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}}]}},"timely":{"doc_count":341,"timely":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Yes","doc_count":339},{"key":"No","doc_count":2}]}},"company_response":{"doc_count":341,"company_response":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Closed with explanation","doc_count":255},{"key":"Closed with non-monetary relief","doc_count":74},{"key":"Closed with monetary relief","doc_count":11},{"key":"Untimely response","doc_count":1}]}},"submitted_via":{"doc_count":341,"submitted_via":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Web","doc_count":341}]}},"company":{"doc_count":341,"company":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.","doc_count":40},{"key":"EQUIFAX, INC.","doc_count":35},{"key":"Experian Information Solutions Inc.","doc_count":34},{"key":"CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION","doc_count":15},{"key":"JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.","doc_count":13},{"key":"AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY","doc_count":11},{"key":"BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION","doc_count":11},{"key":"CITIBANK, N.A.","doc_count":10},{"key":"WELLS FARGO & COMPANY","doc_count":9},{"key":"SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL","doc_count":7},{"key":"AES/PHEAA","doc_count":5},{"key":"Shellpoint Partners, LLC","doc_count":5},{"key":"Specialized Loan Servicing Holdings LLC","doc_count":5},{"key":"BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE","doc_count":4},{"key":"Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.","doc_count":4},{"key":"Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC","doc_count":4},{"key":"TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION","doc_count":4},{"key":"U.S. BANCORP","doc_count":4},{"key":"ALLY FINANCIAL INC.","doc_count":3},{"key":"DISCOVER BANK","doc_count":3},{"key":"Mr. Cooper Group Inc.","doc_count":3},{"key":"Navient Solutions, LLC.","doc_count":3},{"key":"Ocwen Financial Corporation","doc_count":3},{"key":"PNC Bank N.A.","doc_count":3},{"key":"AMERISAVE MORTGAGE CORPORATION","doc_count":2},{"key":"Auto Trakk, LLC","doc_count":2},{"key":"BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO","doc_count":2},{"key":"CAINE & WEINER COMPANY, INC.","doc_count":2},{"key":"CreditNinja Lending, LLC","doc_count":2},{"key":"FIFTH THIRD FINANCIAL CORPORATION","doc_count":2},{"key":"FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO.","doc_count":2},{"key":"GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA","doc_count":2},{"key":"GUARANTEED RATE INC.","doc_count":2},{"key":"Lending Club Corp","doc_count":2},{"key":"NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION","doc_count":2},{"key":"Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.","doc_count":2},{"key":"TD BANK US HOLDING COMPANY","doc_count":2},{"key":"TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC","doc_count":2},{"key":"UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION","doc_count":2},{"key":"Westlake Services, LLC","doc_count":2},{"key":"ACIMA CREDIT, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"ADESA CORPORATION","doc_count":1},{"key":"Aldous & Associates, PLLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"Aldridge Pite, LLP","doc_count":1},{"key":"Bounce AI, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Byrider Franchising, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.","doc_count":1},{"key":"CORELOGIC INC","doc_count":1},{"key":"CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION","doc_count":1},{"key":"Caneel Capital, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"Chime Financial Inc","doc_count":1},{"key":"Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Credit Fresh Holdings Inc","doc_count":1},{"key":"Credit Karma, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"Crown Asset Management, LLC, Duluth, GA Branch","doc_count":1},{"key":"DEBT 0, INC","doc_count":1},{"key":"DELMAR FINANCIAL COMPANY","doc_count":1},{"key":"Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"Ditech Financial LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"ERC","doc_count":1},{"key":"FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION","doc_count":1},{"key":"FinCo Services Inc DBA Current","doc_count":1},{"key":"First Federal Credit Control, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"First Investors Servicing Corporation, Atlanta, GA Branch","doc_count":1},{"key":"First Technology Federal Credit Union","doc_count":1},{"key":"Flagstar Bank, N.A.","doc_count":1},{"key":"General Motors Financial Company, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Guild Holdings Company","doc_count":1},{"key":"HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA","doc_count":1},{"key":"Halsted Financial Services, LLC.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Hayt Hayt & Landau, P.L. (FL)","doc_count":1},{"key":"I.C. System, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"InvestiNet LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"Johnson Mark LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"Klima, Peters & Daly, P.A.","doc_count":1},{"key":"LD Holdings Group, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"LoanCare, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"M&T BANK CORPORATION","doc_count":1},{"key":"MARINER FINANCE, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"MIDFIRST BANK","doc_count":1},{"key":"Mobiloans, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"Monterey Financial Services LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"NFM, INC","doc_count":1},{"key":"National Credit Systems,Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Nelnet, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Netspend Corporation","doc_count":1},{"key":"ONLINE Information Services, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"OneMain Finance Corporation","doc_count":1},{"key":"Paypal Holdings, Inc","doc_count":1},{"key":"Pollack & Rosen, P.A.","doc_count":1},{"key":"RAS LaVrar, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"ROBINHOOD MARKETS INC.","doc_count":1},{"key":"RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"Ratchford Law Group, P.C.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Receivables Management Partners, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"Resurgent Capital Services L.P.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Rocket Mortgage, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC.","doc_count":1},{"key":"SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.","doc_count":1},{"key":"SOFI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.","doc_count":1},{"key":"STELLAR BANCORP INC.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Senex Services Corp.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Sunlight Financial LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"T.S. Holdings","doc_count":1},{"key":"TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION","doc_count":1},{"key":"The Bureaus, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION - SAN FRANCISCO MAIN BRANCH","doc_count":1},{"key":"UPGRADE, INC.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Upstart Holdings, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Velocity Portfolio Group","doc_count":1},{"key":"World Omni Financial Corp.","doc_count":1}]}},"state":{"doc_count":341,"state":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"FL","doc_count":56},{"key":"CA","doc_count":36},{"key":"NY","doc_count":34},{"key":"TX","doc_count":31},{"key":"GA","doc_count":20},{"key":"MI","doc_count":15},{"key":"VA","doc_count":15},{"key":"MA","doc_count":13},{"key":"PA","doc_count":13},{"key":"IL","doc_count":11},{"key":"AZ","doc_count":9},{"key":"MD","doc_count":8},{"key":"OH","doc_count":8},{"key":"NJ","doc_count":7},{"key":"WA","doc_count":7},{"key":"NC","doc_count":6},{"key":"SC","doc_count":6},{"key":"MO","doc_count":5},{"key":"TN","doc_count":5},{"key":"AR","doc_count":4},{"key":"LA","doc_count":4},{"key":"MN","doc_count":4},{"key":"CO","doc_count":3},{"key":"DC","doc_count":3},{"key":"DE","doc_count":3},{"key":"IN","doc_count":3},{"key":"HI","doc_count":2},{"key":"NV","doc_count":2},{"key":"CT","doc_count":1},{"key":"KS","doc_count":1},{"key":"MS","doc_count":1},{"key":"NE","doc_count":1},{"key":"UT","doc_count":1},{"key":"WV","doc_count":1}]}},"company_public_response":{"doc_count":341,"company_public_response":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","doc_count":151},{"key":"Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law","doc_count":15},{"key":"Company chooses not to provide a public response","doc_count":2},{"key":"Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company","doc_count":1},{"key":"Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error","doc_count":1},{"key":"Company believes complaint represents an opportunity for improvement to better serve consumers","doc_count":1},{"key":"Company believes the complaint provided an opportunity to answer consumer's questions","doc_count":1}]}},"tags":{"doc_count":341,"tags":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Servicemember","doc_count":28},{"key":"Older American","doc_count":22},{"key":"Older American, Servicemember","doc_count":1}]}}},"_meta":{"license":"CC0","last_updated":"2026-07-15T12:00:00-05:00","last_indexed":"2026-07-15T12:00:00-05:00","total_record_count":16469162,"is_data_stale":false,"has_data_issue":false,"break_points":{"2":[10.425841,"8445738"],"3":[8.298701,"12522441"],"4":[7.415962,"17357608"],"5":[6.7269025,"11091621"],"6":[6.3133755,"4185075"],"7":[6.162903,"4297526"],"8":[5.865939,"7436856"]}}}