{"took":238,"timed_out":false,"_shards":{"total":5,"successful":5,"skipped":0,"failed":0},"hits":{"total":{"value":64,"relation":"eq"},"max_score":null,"hits":[{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"18573391","_score":16.40956,"_source":{"product":"Debt collection","complaint_what_happened":"Product : Debt Collection Issue : Harassment / Abusive conduct / Refusal to provide validation / Improper communication Company : Internal Credit Systems Individual involved : XXXX XXXX Method of contact : Phone and Email Complaint narrative : I am submitting this complaint regarding the conduct of a representative of Internal Credit Systems, identified as XXXX XXXX. \n\nMy initial interactions with XXXX XXXX occurred by phone. During these calls, XXXX XXXX was verbally aggressive, raised his voice, spoke to me in a disrespectful manner, and repeatedly hung up on me while I was attempting to understand the nature of the alleged debt. When I advised him that I could not hear clearly and requested that he explain the matter calmly, his behavior escalated rather than improved. \n\nDue to this conduct, I requested that all further communication occur in writing only. Despite this lawful request, XXXX XXXX continued to engage in hostile and unprofessional behavior via email. In a written response, he stated that if my feelings were hurt, too bad, dismissed my correspondence as cut and paste, and stated that the company would no longer respond to my emails instead of providing factual validation of the alleged debt. \n\nThroughout this process, I have remained calm, factual, and professional. XXXX XXXX has not. His communications, both verbal and written, appear emotionally driven and retaliatory rather than compliant. His attempts at intimidation and scare tactics were ineffective and inappropriate. \n\nI requested basic validation of the alleged debt, including documentation supporting the obligation and Internal Credit Systems authority to collect. These requests were not substantively addressed. Instead, I was met with yelling on the phone, repeated call terminations, and dismissive written responses. \n\nI believe this conduct constitutes harassment and improper debt collection practices, including abusive phone behavior, refusal to honor lawful communication requests, and failure to engage in professional, factual correspondence. All communications have been preserved. \n\nI am requesting that Internal Credit Systems be required to cease improper communication, address this matter professionally, and ensure compliance with applicable debt collection laws. \n\nThe complete email chain has been preserved and is available upon request should further documentation be required.","date_sent_to_company":"2026-03-02T20:58:41.000Z","issue":"Electronic communications","sub_product":"Other debt","zip_code":"98198","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"18573391","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"INTERNAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC","date_received":"2026-01-08T18:17:03.000Z","state":"WA","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Used obscene, profane, or other abusive language"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["All communications <em>have</em> been <em>preserved</em>. \n\nI am requesting that Internal Credit Systems be required to cease improper communication, address this matter professionally, and ensure <em>compliance</em> with <em>applicable</em> debt collection laws. \n\nThe complete email chain has been <em>preserved</em> and is available upon request should further documentation be required."]},"sort":[16.40956,"18573391"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"21776601","_score":15.679932,"_source":{"product":"Mortgage","complaint_what_happened":"Subject : Conflicted Representation, Compromised Trustee Neutrality, and Misleading Foreclosure Representations Complaint Summary I am submitting this complaint regarding the conduct of Aldridge Pite LLP in connection with a foreclosure involving Clear Recon Corp and XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX.. \n\nAldridge Pite LLP has acted as the primary source of all substantive communications regarding the foreclosure, while representing interests aligned with both the trustee and the loan servicer. \n\nThis dual role raises serious concerns regarding : - The independence and neutrality of the trustee - The accuracy and reliability of representations made regarding the foreclosure - The integrity of the foreclosure process as a whole This complaint should be reviewed in conjunction with my prior CFPB complaint, No. XXXX and XXXX as part of an ongoing pattern of related issues.\n\nKey Issues 1. Conflicted Representation Undermining Trustee Neutrality Aldridge Pite LLP represents Clear Recon Corp, the foreclosure trustee, while also representing interests aligned with XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, the loan servicer. \n\nA foreclosure trustee is required to act as a neutral party in the foreclosure process. \n\nWhere the trustees legal counsel simultaneously represents or advocates for parties with a direct financial interest in the outcome of the foreclosure, the trustees neutrality is called into question. \n\nThis structure creates a situation in which : - The trustees compliance is not independently verified - The foreclosure process is defended rather than objectively evaluated - The appearance and substance of neutrality are undermined 2. Representations Made Without Independent Trustee Verification All substantive responses regarding the foreclosure have been provided through Aldridge Pite LLP.\n\nClear Recon Corp has not provided any direct, independent response confirming its own verification of compliance with foreclosure requirements.\n\nThis raises concerns that : - Representations regarding compliance are being made through counsel - There is no indication that the trustee independently verified those representations A foreclosure can not be considered reliable where the trustee has not independently confirmed compliance. 3. Contradictory and Qualifie\nd Representations In its response, Aldridge Pite LLP asserts that the foreclosure process complied with applicable law, while simultaneously stating that its response : should not be construed as a statement regarding the actions of any other entities. \n\nThis creates an internal inconsistency. \n\nAssertions of compliance necessarily depend on the actions of all parties involved in the foreclosure process. A party can not assert compliance while disclaiming responsibility for the underlying actions required to establish that compliance.\n\n4. Defense of Conduct That Raises Compliance Concerns The foreclosure process at issue includes : - Posting of the Notice of Trustees Sale at a community gate rather than at the property - No attempt to request access or enter the gated community to post at the property - Lack of documentation establishing that a valid foreclosure sale occurred Despite these issues, Aldridge Pite LLP has asserted that the foreclosure complied with applicable law.\n\nThis raises concerns that : - Potential deficiencies are being defended rather than objectively assessed - Representations may not be based on independently verified compliance Regulatory Concerns The conduct described above may constitute : - Misrepresentation of foreclosure compliance - Failure to ensure accuracy of statements made to a consumer - Potential unfair or deceptive acts or practices ( UDAAP ) - Conduct that undermines the neutrality required in the foreclosure process Requested Resolution I request that Aldridge Pite LLP provide : 1. A clear statement of the scope of its representation, including whether it represents : - Clear Recon Corp XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX.\n\n- Or both in connection with this foreclosure 2. An explanation of how trustee neutrality is preserved where the same firm represents or advocates for parties with a direct financial interest in the foreclosure outcome 3. Confirmation of whether the trustee independently verified compliance, or whether representations were made based on information provided by other parties 4. Clarification of the basis for asserting statutory compliance, including how the actions taken ( including posting at the community gate ) were determined to satisfy applicable requirements 5. If independence and compliance can not be clearly established : - Written acknowledgment of the limitations of the representations made, and - Appropriate corrective clarification of those representations Closing Statement Aldridge Pite LLP has acted as the primary source of representations regarding a foreclosure process that raises material questions of compliance, while simultaneously maintaining a role that calls into question the neutrality of the trustee it represents.\n\nA foreclosure process can not be considered reliable where the entity responsible for ensuring compliance is represented by counsel that also advocates for the outcome of that process. \n\nThis matter warrants careful regulatory review. \n\n\n\nAdditional References CFPB Complaints : XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX FTC Report : XXXX XXXX Case No. : XXXX DFPI Complaints : XXXX, XXXX, XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2026-05-01T02:32:00.000Z","issue":"Struggling to pay mortgage","sub_product":"Conventional home mortgage","zip_code":"920XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"21776601","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Aldridge Pite, LLP","date_received":"2026-05-01T01:54:47.000Z","state":"CA","company_public_response":"Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law","sub_issue":"Foreclosure"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["- Or <em>both</em> in connection with this foreclosure 2. An explanation of how trustee neutrality is <em>preserved</em> where the same firm represents or advocates for parties with a direct financial interest in the foreclosure outcome 3. Confirmation of whether the trustee independently verified <em>compliance</em>, or whether representations were made based on information provided by other parties 4."]},"sort":[15.679932,"21776601"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"8350142","_score":14.735726,"_source":{"product":"Debt collection","complaint_what_happened":"XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, FL XXXX DISCOVER BANK XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, UT XXXX Dear DISCOVER BANK, I am writing to address your [ letter or phone call, as I contest the validity of the asserted debt. \n\nThis marks the initiation of communication on this matter, and pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ), specifically under section 809 - Validating Debts, I insist on a comprehensive written response providing the following information : 1. A detailed breakdown of the alleged debt and its origin ; 2. A clear and transparent exposition of the calculations leading to the purported amount owed ; 3. Provision of all documentation demonstrating my agreement to the indebtedness ; 4. Identification of the original creditor in question ; 5. Verification or furnishment of any judgment pertaining to this matter ( if applicable ) ; 6. Presentation of evidence of your licensing in accordance with the laws of my state, along with relevant license numbers ( if applicable ). \n\nI am acutely aware of my rights under both the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. It is imperative that you understand : Any imposition of interest or fees is permissible only as stipulated in the original contract and state legislation. \nYour obligation to respond to this dispute is limited to declaring your intent to either cease collection efforts or pursue lawful avenues for debt recovery. \nPursuing a judgment without adequately validating the debt will be contested in a legal forum, and non-compliance with FDCPA guidelines will be brought to the courts attention. \n\nI explicitly communicate my decision to record all telephonic conversations, preserve all correspondence, and promptly report any violations to the State Attorney General, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Better Business Bureau. \n\nGiven that I have formally disputed this debt, any reporting to credit-reporting agencies must reflect its disputed status. Failure to adhere to this requirement violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) 1681s-2. \n\nIn the event that you do not hold the rights to collect this debt, I demand immediate transmission of this dispute letter to the original creditor for their awareness. \n\nConcluding, pursuant to section 805 ( c ) - Ceasing Collections, of the Fair Debt Collection Act, I assert my right to be contacted solely via official mail. Any correspondence should be limited to notification of the termination of debt collection efforts or specific actions permitted by law. \n\nYour adherence to these directives is expected, and I anticipate your prompt and thorough response to this dispute. \n\nSincerely,","date_sent_to_company":"2024-02-16T06:23:49.000Z","issue":"Written notification about debt","sub_product":"Credit card debt","zip_code":"33169","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"8350142","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"DISCOVER BANK","date_received":"2024-02-16T06:16:42.000Z","state":"FL","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Didn't receive notice of right to dispute"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Verification or furnishment of any judgment pertaining to this matter ( if <em>applicable</em> ) ; 6. Presentation of evidence of your licensing in accordance with the laws of my state, along with relevant license numbers ( if <em>applicable</em> ). \n\nI am acutely aware of my rights under <em>both</em> the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act."]},"sort":[14.735726,"8350142"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"12242977","_score":14.136757,"_source":{"product":"Mortgage","complaint_what_happened":"responsibilities and obligations under the laws governing mortgages in the State of Georgia, specifically regarding the property located at XXXX, XXXX, GA XXXX. As the servicer of the mortgage on this property, you are legally required to comply with certain duties and ensure the protection of the propertys value and the uninterrupted provision of essential services to the resident ( s ) of the said property.\n\n1. Protection of Property Value and Maintenance Under Georgia Mortgage Laws, including but not limited to O.C.G.A. 44-14-162.2 and related statutes, mortgage servicers are required to take necessary steps to ensure that the value of the mortgaged property is protected. This includes maintaining the condition of the property and addressing any issues that may threaten its value, such as damage to common areas, deferred maintenance, or failure to provide necessary services to the residents of the property.\n\nFailure to uphold these obligations could result in a degradation of property value, leading to financial harm to the homeowner and a potential breach of the mortgage servicers fiduciary duties.\n\n2. Provision of Essential Services As the mortgage servicer for the above-listed property, PHH Mortgage Services is responsible for ensuring that all essential services, including utilities such as water, sewage, and electricity, are provided in accordance with state law and contractual obligations. This includes ensuring that the homeowner or tenant does not experience disruptions in services that are necessary for their well-being and the habitability of the property.\n\nGeorgia law, including statutes such as O.C.G.A. 44-7-13, dictates that landlords and property managers, as well as mortgage servicers, must maintain essential services. If there is any interruption of service ( such as water or heating ), the mortgage servicer is obligated to address such issues promptly, ensuring compliance with both state and local housing regulations.\n\n3. Compliance with State Laws Regarding Payment and Foreclosure As outlined under Georgia Mortgage Law and further detailed in the Georgia Fair Lending Act, PHH Mortgage Services is required to take action to prevent mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures, and ensure that all service payments are made promptly to keep essential services active. Additionally, PHH Mortgage Services is required to inform homeowners of their rights regarding any service disruptions or financial obligations associated with the property.\n\nMortgage servicers must also follow the legal process for addressing non-payment or any potential foreclosure actions, ensuring compliance with Georgias foreclosure laws, particularly those in O.C.G.A. 44-14-160 et seq.\n\n4. Request for Immediate Action Given that essential services have been impacted, we request that PHH Mortgage Services take immediate action to ensure : The restoration of services, including water, sewage, and any other essential utilities for Property, XXXX, GA XXXX. \nMaintenance or repairs of any property elements that affect the value or habitability of the unit. \nCompliance with the legal duties to preserve property value, habitability including the avoidance of foreclosure actions unless in strict compliance with the applicable Georgia laws. \nFailure to comply with these responsibilities will result in further legal action to protect the interests of the property owner ( s ) and ensure the enforcement of Georgias housing and mortgage regulations. Thank you","date_sent_to_company":"2025-02-28T21:45:13.000Z","issue":"Trouble during payment process","sub_product":"Conventional home mortgage","zip_code":"30012","tags":"Older American, Servicemember","has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"12242977","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Ocwen Financial Corporation","date_received":"2025-02-28T21:28:37.000Z","state":"GA","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Escrow, taxes, or insurance"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["<em>Compliance</em> with the legal duties to <em>preserve</em> property value, habitability including the avoidance of foreclosure actions unless in strict <em>compliance</em> with the <em>applicable</em> Georgia laws. \nFailure to comply with these responsibilities will result in further legal action to protect the interests of the property owner ( s ) and ensure the enforcement of Georgias housing and mortgage regulations. Thank you"]},"sort":[14.136757,"12242977"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"8350127","_score":13.995216,"_source":{"product":"Credit card","complaint_what_happened":"XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, FL XXXX FIRST PROGRESS CARD XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX TN XXXX Dear FIRST PROGESS CARD, I am writing to address your [ letter or phone call ], as I contest the validity of the asserted debt. \n\nThis marks the initiation of communication on this matter, and pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ), specifically under section 809 - Validating Debts, I insist on a comprehensive written response providing the following information : 1. A detailed breakdown of the alleged debt and its origin ; 2. A clear and transparent exposition of the calculations leading to the purported amount owed ; 3. Provision of all documentation demonstrating my agreement to the indebtedness ; 4. Identification of the original creditor in question ; 5. Verification or furnishment of any judgment pertaining to this matter ( if applicable ) ; 6. Presentation of evidence of your licensing in accordance with the laws of my state, along with relevant license numbers ( if applicable ).\n\nI am acutely aware of my rights under both the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. It is imperative that you understand : Any imposition of interest or fees is permissible only as stipulated in the original contract and state legislation. \nYour obligation to respond to this dispute is limited to declaring your intent to either cease collection efforts or pursue lawful avenues for debt recovery. \nPursuing a judgment without adequately validating the debt will be contested in a legal forum, and non-compliance with FDCPA guidelines will be brought to the courts attention. \n\nI explicitly communicate my decision to record all telephonic conversations, preserve all correspondence, and promptly report any violations to the State Attorney General, the Federal Trade Commission, and the XXXX XXXX XXXX \n\nGiven that I have formally disputed this debt, any reporting to credit-reporting agencies must reflect its disputed status. Failure to adhere to this requirement violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) 1681s-2.\n\nIn the event that you do not hold the rights to collect this debt, I demand immediate transmission of this dispute letter to the original creditor for their awareness.\n\nConcluding, pursuant to section 805 ( c ) - Ceasing Collections, of the Fair Debt Collection Act, I assert my right to be contacted solely via official mail. Any correspondence should be limited to notification of the termination of debt collection efforts or specific actions permitted by law. \n\nYour adherence to these directives is expected, and I anticipate your prompt and thorough response to this dispute. \n\nSincerely,","date_sent_to_company":"2024-02-16T06:37:29.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"General-purpose credit card or charge card","zip_code":"33169","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"8350127","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Synovus Bank","date_received":"2024-02-16T06:24:26.000Z","state":"FL","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Information belongs to someone else"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Verification or furnishment of any judgment pertaining to this matter ( if <em>applicable</em> ) ; 6. Presentation of evidence of your licensing in accordance with the laws of my state, along with relevant license numbers ( if <em>applicable</em> ).\n\nI am acutely aware of my rights under <em>both</em> the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act."]},"sort":[13.995216,"8350127"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"8350687","_score":13.964081,"_source":{"product":"Debt collection","complaint_what_happened":"XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, FL XXXX Summit Account Resolution XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, MN XXXX Dear Summit Account Resolution, I am writing to address your [ letter or phone call ] dated XX/XX/2023, a copy of which is enclosed, as I contest the validity of the asserted debt. \n\nThis marks the initiation of communication on this matter, and pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ), specifically under section 809 - Validating Debts, I insist on a comprehensive written response providing the following information : 1. A detailed breakdown of the alleged debt and its origin ; 2. A clear and transparent exposition of the calculations leading to the purported amount owed ; 3. Provision of all documentation demonstrating my agreement to the indebtedness ; 4. Identification of the original creditor in question ; 5. Verification or furnishment of any judgment pertaining to this matter ( if applicable ) ; 6. Presentation of evidence of your licensing in accordance with the laws of my state, along with relevant license numbers ( if applicable ). \n\nI am acutely aware of my rights under both the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. It is imperative that you understand : Any imposition of interest or fees is permissible only as stipulated in the original contract and state legislation. \nYour obligation to respond to this dispute is limited to declaring your intent to either cease collection efforts or pursue lawful avenues for debt recovery. \nPursuing a judgment without adequately validating the debt will be contested in a legal forum, and non-compliance with FDCPA guidelines will be brought to the courts attention. \n\nI explicitly communicate my decision to record all telephonic conversations, preserve all correspondence, and promptly report any violations to the State Attorney General, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Better Business Bureau. \n\nGiven that I have formally disputed this debt, any reporting to credit-reporting agencies must reflect its disputed status. Failure to adhere to this requirement violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) 1681s-2. \n\nIn the event that you do not hold the rights to collect this debt, I demand immediate transmission of this dispute letter to the original creditor for their awareness. \n\nConcluding, pursuant to section 805 ( c ) - Ceasing Collections, of the Fair Debt Collection Act, I assert my right to be contacted solely via official mail. Any correspondence should be limited to notification of the termination of debt collection efforts or specific actions permitted by law. \n\nYour adherence to these directives is expected, and I anticipate your prompt and thorough response to this dispute. \n\nSincerely, XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2024-02-16T05:52:10.000Z","issue":"Written notification about debt","sub_product":"Credit card debt","zip_code":"33169","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"8350687","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Summit A*R, Inc.","date_received":"2024-02-16T05:23:11.000Z","state":"FL","company_public_response":"Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint","sub_issue":"Didn't receive notice of right to dispute"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Verification or furnishment of any judgment pertaining to this matter ( if <em>applicable</em> ) ; 6. Presentation of evidence of your licensing in accordance with the laws of my state, along with relevant license numbers ( if <em>applicable</em> ). \n\nI am acutely aware of my rights under <em>both</em> the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act."]},"sort":[13.964081,"8350687"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"8350205","_score":13.925354,"_source":{"product":"Debt collection","complaint_what_happened":"XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, FL XXXX MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, California XXXX Dear MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, I am writing to address your [ letter or phone call ] dated XX/XX/2023, a copy of which is enclosed, as I contest the validity of the asserted debt. \n\nThis marks the initiation of communication on this matter, and pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ), specifically under section 809 - Validating Debts, I insist on a comprehensive written response providing the following information : 1. A detailed breakdown of the alleged debt and its origin ; 2. A clear and transparent exposition of the calculations leading to the purported amount owed ; 3. Provision of all documentation demonstrating my agreement to the indebtedness ; 4. Identification of the original creditor in question ; 5. Verification or furnishment of any judgment pertaining to this matter ( if applicable ) ; 6. Presentation of evidence of your licensing in accordance with the laws of my state, along with relevant license numbers ( if applicable ).\n\nI am acutely aware of my rights under both the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. It is imperative that you understand : Any imposition of interest or fees is permissible only as stipulated in the original contract and state legislation.\n\nYour obligation to respond to this dispute is limited to declaring your intent to either cease collection efforts or pursue lawful avenues for debt recovery.\n\nPursuing a judgment without adequately validating the debt will be contested in a legal forum, and non-compliance with FDCPA guidelines will be brought to the courts attention.\n\nI explicitly communicate my decision to record all telephonic conversations, preserve all correspondence, and promptly report any violations to the State Attorney General, the Federal Trade Commission, and the XXXX XXXX XXXX\n\nGiven that I have formally disputed this debt, any reporting to credit-reporting agencies must reflect its disputed status. Failure to adhere to this requirement violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) 1681s-2.\n\nIn the event that you do not hold the rights to collect this debt, I demand immediate transmission of this dispute letter to the original creditor for their awareness.\n\nConcluding, pursuant to section 805 ( c ) - Ceasing Collections, of the Fair Debt Collection Act, I assert my right to be contacted solely via official mail. Any correspondence should be limited to notification of the termination of debt collection efforts or specific actions permitted by law. \n\nYour adherence to these directives is expected, and I anticipate your prompt and thorough response to this dispute. \n\nSincerely, XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2024-02-16T06:00:27.000Z","issue":"Written notification about debt","sub_product":"Credit card debt","zip_code":"33169","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"8350205","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC.","date_received":"2024-02-16T05:53:53.000Z","state":"FL","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Didn't receive notice of right to dispute"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Verification or furnishment of any judgment pertaining to this matter ( if <em>applicable</em> ) ; 6. Presentation of evidence of your licensing in accordance with the laws of my state, along with relevant license numbers ( if <em>applicable</em> ).\n\nI am acutely aware of my rights under <em>both</em> the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act."]},"sort":[13.925354,"8350205"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"21162441","_score":11.829262,"_source":{"product":"Money transfer, virtual currency, or money service","complaint_what_happened":"This is a copy of the formal notice sent to JP Morgan Chase bank ( receiving bank of fraudulent wire ) : Per our phone conversation today, XX/XX/year>, a case was created for the fraud being conducted by an account holder of JP Morgan Chase Bank. The following documentation of the wire transfer and the return wire transfer request is attached - {$33000.00} on XX/XX/year>. Per my initial phone call on XX/XX/year> - I notified JP Morgan Chase of the fraudulent actions on behalf of XXXX of their account holders and was informed that the account had been closed per an internal fraud report and the funds were currently placed on hold. I was instructed to have my bank issue a reverse wire transfer request with the reason of fraud to be listed and the funds would be returned. We complied with this request ( attached ) and the only response was that the account was closed. I spoke with numerous unhelpful parties at JP Morgan today and finally received assistance from XXXX XXXX who was unable, per management, to provide me with the case ID, but was able to put a formal case in place for this request to ensure the funds remained held until returned and notice of potential litigation. \n\nJP Morgan Chase Account Holder | Fraudulent Beneficiary Information Account : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX I am submitting this formal written notice regarding a wire fraud transaction involving XXXX of your account holders. This letter serves as a demand for immediate action and a litigation-hold directive. \nImmediate Hold on Funds and Freeze of Associated Account ( s ) I am demanding that the bank immediately place a hold on all funds associated with the fraudulent wire transaction and freeze the receiving account ( s ) to prevent further dissipation or transfer of the funds. You are on notice that failure to take reasonable steps to prevent further loss could constitute a breach of your obligations under applicable federal regulations, including Regulation E, the Bank Secrecy Act, and your own internal fraud-prevention duties.\n\nThis notice constitutes a formal demand under UCC Article 4A that JP Morgan Chase initiate all required actions to recall, return, and/or interdict the fraudulent transfer, including coordination with the receiving branch and any intermediary institutions. \nPreservation of All Evidence ( Litigation Hold ) You are hereby instructed to retain and preserve all records relevant to this matter, including but not limited to : This constitutes a formal legal notice of anticipated litigation. Please ensure that all such data is protected from deletion under any standard retention-purge schedules. \nAll account statements, ledgers, inbound/outbound wire logs, and transfer histories ; All internal fraud-investigation notes, case files, and escalation tickets ; All KYC/AML documentation associated with both the sender and recipient accounts ; All phone call recordings, call logs, written notes, chat transcripts, and customer-service communications regarding this issue ; All internal communications ( emails, memos, system messages ) concerning the transaction. \nRequest for Immediate Disclosure of Records Pursuant to federal consumer-protection standards, I demand copies of the following : All documents and data pertaining to the transaction, including wire transfer details, originator/beneficiary information, timestamps, and system approval logs ; The banks internal fraud investigation report, including findings, timelines, system screenshots ( if available ), and actions taken both pre- and post-notification ; Any SAR-related disclosures that you are legally able to provide ( acknowledging you can not disclose SAR filings themselves ).\n\nYou are directed to escalate this matter immediately to your BSA/AML Fraud Unit for interdiction under the banks obligations pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act and your Federal Regulator ( OCC ) standards.\n\nPlease confirm in writing whether any portion of the wired funds remain in the receiving account or any related accounts, whether they have been moved, and the date and time of any outflow, if applicable. \nNotice of Potential Legal Action This notification places the bank on formal notice that I am evaluating potential legal remedies. Your immediate cooperation, transparency, and compliance with evidence-preservation obligations will be necessary to avoid claims of spoliation, negligence, or breach of fiduciary duty. \nThis letter/email also places JP Morgan Chase on notice that your account holders conduct may trigger review of your XXXX  XXXX, and AML procedures XXXX and that your handling of this matter will be examined for potential negligent enablement of fraud. \nPlease provide written confirmation within XXXX hours that : All funds and accounts associated with the transaction are placed on hold, All evidence and communications are preserved, and My request for documentation is being processed. \n\nNon-Waiver : Nothing in this correspondence should be interpreted as a waiver of any rights, remedies, claims, or causes of action available to me under federal or state law, UCC Article 4A, or common law. \nSincerely, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  Attachments : Wire Transfer Receipt Return Wire Request Return Wire Denial __________________________ To date JP Morgan refusing to assist us or communicate with our bank. They have not responded to the formal notice.","date_sent_to_company":"2026-04-11T18:22:31.000Z","issue":"Fraud or scam","sub_product":"Domestic (US) money transfer","zip_code":"618XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"21162441","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.","date_received":"2026-04-11T18:11:00.000Z","state":"IL","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":null},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["They <em>have</em> not responded to the formal notice."]},"sort":[11.829262,"21162441"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"22806729","_score":11.750369,"_source":{"product":"Vehicle loan or lease","complaint_what_happened":"CONSUMER COMPLAINT TO THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Submission Method : Online Portal Complaint Reference : [ CFPB CASE NUMBER - TO BE ASSIGNED ] ________________________________________ COMPLAINANT INFORMATION Full Legal Name : XXXX XXXX Current Mailing Address : XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, NV XXXX Primary Phone Number : ( XXXX ) XXXX Email Address : XXXX Jurisdiction : XXXX, Nevada ________________________________________ FINANCIAL INSTITUTION INFORMATION Company Name : Hyundai Motor Finance Company Product Type : Auto Loan/Vehicle Financing Vehicle Information : XXXX XXXX XXXX  Vehicle Identification Number ( VIN ) : XXXX Approximate Monthly Payment : {$670.00} Loan Origination Period : XXXX XXXX ________________________________________ DECEASED BORROWER INFORMATION Deceased Borrowers Full Legal Name : XXXX XXXX Date of Birth : XX/XX/XXXX Date of Death : XX/XX/XXXX Last Known Address : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX  XXXX, XXXX, NV XXXX Last XXXX Digits of Social Security Number : XXXX Complainants Relationship to Deceased : Heir to the deceaseds estate with interest in preserving the vehicle asset Estate Status : The family is currently researching and looking into probate proceedings in Nevada. We recently received the death certificate after an extended waiting period, which delayed our ability to properly notify creditors and begin estate administration. \n________________________________________ DETAILED ISSUE DESCRIPTION Timeline of Events XXXX XXXX : XXXX  XXXX financed the XXXX XXXX XXXX  through Hyundai Motor Finance Company XXXX The financing included a trade-in of a XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX resulting in monthly payments of approximately {$670.00}. XXXX XXXX consistently made payments using her XXXX XXXX benefits. \nXX/XX/XXXX : XXXX  XXXX passed away due to terminal XXXX that caused XXXX failure. Her death was unexpected despite her illness, creating immediate financial and logistical challenges for the family. \nXXXX XXXX through XX/XX/XXXX : The family was in the process of relocating residences by the end of XX/XX/XXXX. When XXXX XXXX passed away, the family became stuck with the moving process while simultaneously dealing with her death and estate matters. \nXX/XX/XXXX : The family was unable to make the scheduled monthly payment due to the immediate financial strain and housing instability caused by XXXX XXXX unexpected death. \nWithin the Last Sixty Days : I contacted Hyundai Motor Finance twice to notify them of my mothers passing and to request payment arrangements. During the first call, I specifically inquired about making a payment arrangement to maintain the loan in good standing. Hyundai Motor Finance denied this request without providing any explanation or alternative solutions. \nRecent Weeks : The family finally received XXXX XXXX death certificate after an extended waiting period, which had prevented us from properly documenting her death to creditors and financial institutions. \nCurrent Status : I have completed the relocation process. The XXXX XXXX XXXX  is now secured at XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, NV XXXX. The vehicle is covered by active insurance under my name, and I am the listed driver on the insurance policy. \nCommunication with Hyundai Motor Finance Despite my attempts to work with Hyundai Motor Finance in good faith, the company has provided no meaningful assistance or alternative solutions. The representatives I spoke with declined to offer payment arrangements without providing any explanation for this decision or information about other available options for families dealing with deceased borrower situations. \n________________________________________ CONSUMER PROTECTION CONCERNS Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Compliance Issues XXXX XXXX XXXX refusal to work with heirs on payment arrangements during the estate transition period raises concerns about potential violations of fair debt collection practices. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692, financial institutions must provide reasonable accommodations and can not engage in unfair practices when dealing with family members of deceased borrowers. \nFailure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation Hyundai Motor Finance has failed to provide reasonable accommodation for estate-related circumstances. The companys rigid approach to deceased borrower situations demonstrates a lack of policies that consider the unique challenges families face during estate transitions, particularly when dealing with unexpected deaths and the time required to obtain necessary documentation such as death certificates. \nLack of Clear Communication About Options The company has demonstrated a lack of clear communication about available options for families of deceased borrowers. This absence of transparent communication violates consumer protection principles and leaves families without guidance during already difficult circumstances. \nNeed for Better Policies for Deceased Borrower Situations Hyundai Motor Finances current policies appear inadequate for handling deceased borrower situations in a manner that complies with federal consumer protection laws. The companys approach fails to recognize the legitimate interests of heirs who wish to preserve vehicle assets and continue loan payments during estate administration. \n________________________________________ FINANCIAL IMPACT AND CIRCUMSTANCES Immediate Financial Strain and Housing Instability XXXX  XXXX unexpected death created immediate financial strain and housing instability for me and my family. The timing of her death coincided with our planned relocation, which compounded the financial and logistical challenges we faced. This situation forced us to manage estate matters, complete a move, and attempt to maintain loan obligations simultaneously. \nTemporary Financial Difficulty with Commitment to Payment While I am experiencing temporary financial difficulty due to the circumstances surrounding my mothers death and our forced relocation, I remain committed to maintaining the loan payments. The vehicle represents my mothers hard work and dedication, as she consistently made payments using her Social Security benefits from the time she financed the car. \nPreservation of Vehicle Asset The XXXX XXXX XXXX represents a significant asset of my mothers estate and a testament to her hard work prior to her death. The familys desire to preserve this asset is both financially prudent and emotionally important as we honor her memory and the efforts she made to secure reliable transportation.\n\n________________________________________ DESIRED RESOLUTION AND CFPB ACTION REQUESTED Investigation into Hyundai Motor Finance Practices I respectfully request that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau investigate Hyundai Motor Finances practices regarding deceased borrower situations and their compliance with federal consumer protection laws. This investigation should examine whether the companys policies and procedures adequately protect the rights of family members and heirs during estate transitions. \nMediation and Dispute Resolution I request that the CFPB facilitate mediation between my family and Hyundai Motor Finance to establish a reasonable payment arrangement that allows us to maintain the vehicle while properly administering my mothers estate. A dispute resolution meeting would provide an opportunity for both parties to reach a fair agreement that honors my mothers memory and hard work. \nPayment Arrangement or Loan Modification I seek the CFPBs assistance in facilitating a reasonable payment arrangement or loan modification that takes into account the unique circumstances of my mothers death and the familys commitment to maintaining the loan. Such an arrangement should provide adequate time for estate administration while preserving the vehicle asset. \nTimeline for Response Given the urgent nature of the estate situation and the risk of further complications, I request that Hyundai Motor Finance be required to contact me within fifteen ( 15 ) days of receiving this complaint to discuss resolution options. \n________________________________________ SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND CURRENT STATUS Vehicle Security and Insurance Coverage The XXXX XXXX XXXX  is currently secured at my residence at XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, NV XXXX. The vehicle is covered by active insurance under my name, and I am the listed driver on the insurance policy. This demonstrates my commitment to maintaining the vehicle properly and my ability to assume responsibility for its care and maintenance. \nCommunication Preferences I request that Hyundai Motor Finance contact me by phone at ( XXXX ) XXXX and provide an email address for ongoing communication regarding this matter. Clear and direct communication channels will facilitate resolution and prevent further misunderstandings.\n\nEstate Administration Context While the family continues to research and pursue proper estate administration procedures in Nevada, the immediate need to address the vehicle loan can not wait for the completion of lengthy probate proceedings. The vehicles preservation is essential to maintaining the estates assets and honoring my mothers investment in reliable transportation. \n________________________________________ REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND LEGAL BASIS This complaint is submitted pursuant to the Consumer Financial Protection Act of XXXX, which establishes the CFPBs authority to investigate consumer complaints and ensure compliance with federal consumer financial protection laws. The issues raised in this complaint implicate several areas of federal consumer protection law : Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1692 ) : XXXX XXXX XXXX handling of this matter raises questions about compliance with FDCPA requirements regarding communication with family members of deceased borrowers and the provision of reasonable accommodations during estate transitions. \nCFPB Regulation F ( 12 CFR Part 1006 ) : The companys communication practices and response to family member inquiries should comply with current regulatory requirements for debt collection communications and frequency limitations.\n\nTruth in Lending Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1601 ) and Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1691 ) : These laws provide additional consumer protections that should inform how financial institutions handle deceased borrower situations and work with family members seeking to preserve loan relationships.\n\n________________________________________ CONCLUSION AND HOPE FOR RESOLUTION I express hope that CFPB intervention will lead to a fair resolution that honors my mothers memory and hard work. XXXX  XXXX was a dedicated individual who consistently paid for this vehicle using her XXXX XXXX benefits from the time she financed it. Her commitment to maintaining her financial obligations should be respected, and her familys desire to preserve the vehicle she worked so hard to obtain should be accommodated through reasonable payment arrangements. \nThe resolution of this matter will not only serve my familys interests but will also establish important precedents for how financial institutions should handle deceased borrower situations with compassion, transparency, and compliance with federal consumer protection laws. \nI respectfully request the CFPBs prompt attention to this matter and assistance in achieving a resolution that allows my family to honor my mothers legacy while maintaining the vehicle that represents her hard work and dedication. \n________________________________________ ATTESTATION AND SIGNATURE I, XXXX XXXX XXXX hereby attest that the information provided in this complaint is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that providing false information to a federal agency may result in penalties under applicable law. I authorize the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to share this complaint with Hyundai Motor Finance Company for the purpose of facilitating resolution of this matter.\n\nI further attest that I have made good faith efforts to resolve this matter directly with Hyundai Motor Finance Company before submitting this complaint to the CFPB, and that the company has not provided reasonable accommodation or alternative solutions to address the circumstances arising from my mothers death. \n________________________________________ Contact Information for Follow-Up : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, NV XXXX XXXX : ( XXXX ) XXXX Email : XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2026-06-02T15:14:58.000Z","issue":"Struggling to pay your loan","sub_product":"Loan","zip_code":"89512","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"22806729","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA","date_received":"2026-06-02T15:09:03.000Z","state":"NV","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Denied request to lower payments"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["The familys desire to <em>preserve</em> this asset is <em>both</em> financially prudent and emotionally important as we honor her memory and the efforts she made to secure reliable transportation.\n\n________________________________________ DESIRED RESOLUTION AND CFPB ACTION REQUESTED Investigation into Hyundai Motor Finance Practices I respectfully request that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau investigate Hyundai Motor Finances practices regarding deceased borrower situations and their <em>compliance</em> with federal"]},"sort":[11.750369,"22806729"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"12964480","_score":11.691668,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"RE : Follow-Up to CFPB Complaint Unauthorized Reporting and Improper Investigation of Securitized Student Loan Accounts This is a follow-up in response to the company 's interim decision and investigation regarding my formal complaint against TransUnion and XXXX. I am submitting this clarification to emphasize key legal and procedural violations that remain unresolved, specifically : 1. Lack of a Signed Promissory Note by XXXX XXXX has failed to provide any original, signed promissory note evidencing that I consented to or entered into a contractual agreement with them. The absence of this document raises serious legal concerns regarding the legitimacy of their authority to collect on or report these debts. \n\nAccording to the Truth in Lending Act and general principles of contract law, a signed agreement is essential to establish enforceability. XXXX 's inability or refusal to produce this document invalidates their standing to collect on or report these accounts. \n\n2. Securitized Loans Are Held in Trusts XXXX Can not Enforce or Collect The loans in question were securitized and placed into a trust, which removes XXXX legal ownership or authority to collect. Under UCC Article 9 and federal trust law, once XXXX XXXX are securitized, the servicer becomes merely an administrator with no legal claim to the debt unless explicitly empowered by the trust a fact they have not demonstrated. \n\nWithout a verifiable chain of title and authorization from the trust holder, XXXX is operating without standing or permissible purpose. This is a potential FDCPA and FCRA violation, as it involves false representation of authority and reporting without legal grounds. \n\n3. TransUnion 's Complicity and Financial Incentive TransUnion continues to report these disputed accounts without proof of authorization or signed agreements. This undermines their obligation under 15 U.S.C. 1681i to conduct a thorough and independent reinvestigation. Instead, they appear to rely solely on the word of the data furnisher in this case, XXXX whose conflict of interest is clear. \n\nTransUnion has a known financial interest in maintaining relationships with data furnishers, who pay to furnish and access consumer data. This creates a significant conflict of interest, and undermines the integrity of the dispute process. \n\nFurthermore, TransUnion failed to provide documentation confirming : The existence of a signed promissory note ; Proper authorization to report the loans ; Compliance with my request to block inaccurate information under FCRA 605B, despite submitting an ID Theft Report and supporting documentation.\n\n4. Violation of My Rights Under FCRA and Identity Theft Law I also reiterate that this reporting is a violation of 15 U.S.C. 1681b, as no permissible purpose exists for TransUnion to continue publishing these accounts on my credit report without lawful consent. Furthermore, given that my personal information was used in the absence of authorization, this constitutes a potential violation of 18 U.S.C. 1028A Aggravated Identity Theft. \n\nRequested Remedy Given the clear lack of documentation, chain of title, and legal basis to collect or report these loans : All XXXXrelated accounts must be permanently removed from my credit file ; TransUnion must cease and desist further reporting of these accounts ; I request a complete audit trail of all communications and data TransUnion relied upon in their investigation ; I request confirmation that both entities have retained and preserved all documentation related to this case for potential legal discovery. \n\nIf this issue is not resolved in full compliance with FCRA and other applicable statutes, I am prepared to escalate this matter to my State Attorney General, the FTC, and pursue civil litigation for damages.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-04-13T17:24:10.000Z","issue":"Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"604XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"12964480","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.","date_received":"2025-04-13T17:14:07.000Z","state":"IL","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Their investigation did not fix an error on your report"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["If this issue is not resolved in full <em>compliance</em> with FCRA and other <em>applicable</em> statutes, I am prepared to escalate this matter to my State Attorney General, the FTC, and pursue civil litigation for damages."]},"sort":[11.691668,"12964480"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"12002950","_score":11.323985,"_source":{"product":"Mortgage","complaint_what_happened":"I am writing in response to the denial letter dated XX/XX/year>, regarding my loan modification request for loan XXXX XXXXXXXX. I appreciate the time taken to review my initial application. However, I respectfully request that you reconsider my application in light of additional documentation and further clarification of my financial hardship. \nI understand that my initial submission did not fully meet your internal criteria. Nonetheless, I wish to emphasize that as a borrower experiencing financial difficulty, I am entitled to a fair evaluation under several federal guidelines. Specifically : XXXX. CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules ( 12 CFR Part 1024 ) : These rules require that mortgage servicers evaluate a borrowers request for loan modification in a fair and transparent manner. \nXXXX. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act : This Act reinforces the need for loss mitigation optionsincluding loan modificationsfor borrowers facing hardship. \nXXXX. Government-Backed Loan Guidelines : If my loan is governed by FHA, XXXX  XXXX XXXX or XXXX XXXX guidelines XXXX I understand that these programs provide structured criteria for modification requests that take financial hardship into account. \nXXXX. Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) : My mortgage is a fixed-rate loan with an original interest rate of 3.25 %. Any modification to my loan must preserve this rate, as guaranteed by the contract and supported by TILA and CFPB guidelines. I demand that, regardless of any hardship modifications, my interest rate must remain at 3.25 %, ensuring my monthly payments stay at a manageable level of approximately {$1300.00}. \nXXXX. CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules ( 12 CFR Part 1024 ) and Applicable Consumer Protection Laws : These guidelines require that mortgage servicers treat borrowers fairly and transparently. They support the premise that modificationsincluding any changes to the interest ratemust be conducted in accordance with both the contractual terms and the consumer protections afforded by federal and state law. \nXXXX. Certified Letter and Unauthorized Meeting Offer : a. On XX/XX/year>, I received a certified letter from PNC instructing me to attend a face-to-face meeting at my home with representatives from XXXX. XXXX XXXX, XXXX. \nb. This meeting was offered as part of a resolution following my complaint regarding the unauthorized sale of my personal information and the increase in my loan modification interest ratesactions that I believe violate federal privacy protections ( e.g., under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ) and the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ), which mandates that all terms, including a fixed interest rate, be clearly disclosed and adhered to. \nXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX and XXXX XXXX : a. In the same letter, I was allowed to file a XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX, mailed to me on XX/XX/year>. \nb. Despite this offer, I received a subsequent XXXX letter stating that I must be 60 days delinquent to qualify for hardship assistanceeven though I was delinquent in XXXX and XXXXand simultaneously offered the face-to-face meeting option with XXXX. XXXX XXXX, XXXX. \nc. These conflicting communications have confused me and have led me to question PNCs intent and compliance with fair lending practices and consumer protection guidelines under the XXXX XXXX and CFPB rules. \nXXXX. My Response and Concerns Regarding Unauthorized Procedures : a. On XX/XX/year>, I sent a fax declining the offer of a face-to-face meeting with XXXX. XXXX XXXX, XXXX, as I did not consent to the involvement of third parties who have already compromised my personal information. \nb. I have since learned that PNC intended to conduct an unnotified appraisal of my home without my permission. Such an appraisal is unauthorized and further exacerbates my concerns regarding the mishandling of my private data and my rights under my original mortgage agreement. \nXXXX. Fixed Interest Rate Violation : a. My mortgage is a fixed-rate loan with an original interest rate of 3.75 %. Any modification to my loan must preserve this rate, as guaranteed by the contract and supported by XXXX and CFPB guidelines. \nb. I demand that, regardless of any hardship modifications, my interest rate must remain at 3.75 %, ensuring my monthly payments stay at a manageable level of approximately {$1300.00}. \nIn summary, I demand the following actions be taken immediately : Restore my interest rate to the original fixed rate of 3.75 % as stipulated in my mortgage agreement, thereby preserving my payment amount at approximately {$1300.00} per month. \nProvide a full, written explanation of the discrepancies in PNCs communicationsincluding the unauthorized sale of my personal information, the involvement of XXXX. XXXX XXXX, XXXX, and the attempt to perform an unnotified appraisal of my home. \nConfirm in writing that no further unauthorized changes or actions affecting the fixed interest rate or other key terms of my loan will be implemented without my explicit consent. \nAcknowledge receipt of this letter and provide a timeline for resolving these issues. \nGiven these legal safeguards, I respectfully request the following : A detailed explanation of the documentation deficiencies or criteria that led to the denial of my initial loan modification application. \nAssurance, in writing, that the fixed interest rate on my mortgage will remain unchanged with a new mutually agreed executed modification.\n\nAn opportunity to submit updated financial information and any additional documentation that accurately reflects my current hardship for a reconsideration of my modification request. \nIn light of these protections, I kindly request the following : XXXX. A detailed explanation of the specific criteria and documentation deficiencies resulted in the denial of my loan modification application. \nXXXX. I am resubmitting the same loan modification that accurately reflects my current financial situation. \nXXXX. Confirmation that my revised application will be reconsidered by the aforementioned federal guidelines and any applicable state laws designed to protect borrowers. \nI am requesting that my original interest rate be reinstated in its original form and not converted into an adjustable-rate mortgage ( ARM ). Under the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) and other relevant consumer protection laws, I am entitled to clear and accurate information regarding any changes to the terms of my loan, including interest rates.\n\nPlease provide me with a written response regarding the status of this request. You may contact me at my preferred form of communication, XXXX. \nPlease note that if these matters are not resolved promptly and to my satisfaction, I will have no choice but to pursue all available legal remedies, including filing complaints with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) and seeking legal counsel to initiate a lawsuit. \nI expect a written response within 15 business days from the date of this letter. I trust that PNC will act immediately to correct these issues and honor the original terms of my mortgage. \nThank you for your prompt attention to this matter. I look forward to your response and a fair reevaluation of my situation. \nSincerely, XXXX XXXX Enclosures :","date_sent_to_company":"2025-02-08T23:55:11.000Z","issue":"Struggling to pay mortgage","sub_product":"FHA mortgage","zip_code":"20747","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"12002950","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"PNC Bank N.A.","date_received":"2025-02-08T23:48:18.000Z","state":"MD","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Applying for or obtaining a modification, forbearance plan, short sale, or deed-in-lieu"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["These conflicting communications <em>have</em> confused me and <em>have</em> led me to question PNCs intent and <em>compliance</em> with fair lending practices and consumer protection guidelines under the XXXX XXXX and CFPB rules. \nXXXX. My Response and Concerns Regarding Unauthorized Procedures : a. On XX/XX/year>, I sent a fax declining the offer of a face-to-face meeting with XXXX. XXXX XXXX, XXXX, as I did not consent to the involvement of third parties who <em>have</em> already compromised my personal information. \nb."]},"sort":[11.323985,"12002950"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"12244851","_score":11.265154,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"Dear CFPB Representative, I am writing as a XXXX XXXXXXXX of the XXXX and a XXXX XXXX to file a formal grievance regarding the non-compliance of consumer reporting agencies ( CRAs ) with their legal and scientific obligations under federal and international law. Recent practices by these agenciesspecifically, the failure to validate disputed debts within the legally mandated 30-day periodare in direct violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ), and the constitutional rights afforded to me. \n\n1. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, as outlined in the XXXX XXXX series on data quality standards, require that all information included in a consumer report be rigorously verified with empirical evidence before being maintained. In my case, the alleged debts remain unsubstantiated by independent, scientifically verifiable proof. This failure undermines the fundamental scientific principle of reproducibility and casts serious doubt on the reliability of the data being reported. \nLawful Reference : Under 15 U.S.C. 1681i of the FCRA, a consumer reporting agency is required to conduct a reasonable investigation and verify the accuracy of disputed information within 30 days. The lack of proper debt validation constitutes a breach of this mandate.\n\n2. Ancient Principles of Justice and Fairness The principles of justice have been enshrined in ancient legal texts, such as the Code of Hammurabi and the legal traditions of Roman jurisprudence, which insist that claims must be supported by timely and accurate evidence. When evidence is lacking, justice demands the expungement of unsupported claims to preserve an individuals honor and integrity.\n\nLawful Reference : This time-honored principle is echoed in the due process protections guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and further reinforced by international legal instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights ( Article 12 ) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ( Article 14 ). \n\n3. Constitutional and International Law Compliance As a consumer reporting agency, CRAs are legally bound to ensure that all information reported is accurate and substantiated. The failure to provide proper debt validationby merely updating or verifying without documented, evidence-based confirmationdirectly violates the FCRAs requirements as well as my constitutional right to due process.\n\nLawful Reference : The FCRA, particularly 15 U.S.C. 1681e ( b ) and 1681i, combined with the FDCPA under 15 U.S.C. 1692g, mandates that any alleged debt must be validated and that collection activities must cease until such validation is provided.\n\n4. Debt Validation Requirements Under Federal Law The FDCPA requires that any debt in dispute be properly validated. Specifically, 15 U.S.C. 1692g obligates debt collectors to furnish a validation notice detailing the amount of the debt and the creditors information, ceasing collection activities until the debt is verified. The absence of such a validation notice and the continued reporting of an unverified debt clearly violate federal law.\n\nLawful Reference : Failure to adhere to these statutory requirements not only contravenes the FDCPA but also exacerbates the risk of disseminating inaccurate information in my consumer report, thereby violating the FCRA as well. \n\n5. Request for Enforcement and Remedial Action Given the foregoing, I respectfully demand that the CFPB enforce the applicable federal laws against these consumer reporting agencies to ensure full compliance. I urge your office to require that CRAs : Conduct proper, scientifically rigorous investigations in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 1681i.\n\nRemove any unvalidated debt entries that have not met the 30-day verification requirement.\n\nProvide a complete audit trail of all validations performed, in alignment with the due process protections under the Fifth Amendment.\n\nCease the reporting and potential use of unsubstantiated data in consumer reports, in accordance with both domestic and international legal mandates. \n\nI trust that the CFPB will take immediate and decisive action to rectify these violations and safeguard the rights of consumers. Until comprehensive enforcement measures are implemented, I reserve all rights under U.S. law, international treaties, and the longstanding legal traditions that protect XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX \n\nRespectfully, UCC 1-308","date_sent_to_company":"2025-02-28T20:32:34.000Z","issue":"Problem with a company's investigation into an existing issue","sub_product":"Other personal consumer report","zip_code":"76542","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"12244851","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.","date_received":"2025-02-28T20:27:06.000Z","state":"TX","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Investigation took more than 30 days"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Request for Enforcement and Remedial Action Given the foregoing, I respectfully demand that the CFPB enforce the <em>applicable</em> federal laws against these consumer reporting agencies to ensure full <em>compliance</em>. I urge your office to require that CRAs : Conduct proper, scientifically rigorous investigations in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 1681i.\n\nRemove any unvalidated debt entries that <em>have</em> not met the 30-day verification requirement."]},"sort":[11.265154,"12244851"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"16845543","_score":11.069065,"_source":{"product":"Checking or savings account","complaint_what_happened":"Date : XX/XX/year> To : Eastern Bank XXXX XXXX XXXX, Route XXXX XXXX XXXX, MA XXXX From : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, MA XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX Via Email to : XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Branch XXXX ) and Via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested Re : Formal Demand for Refund of Improper Administrative and Escheated Funds Fees, Account Ending : XXXX Dear Sir or Madam : I am writing to formally dispute the closure of my above-referenced account and the deduction of {$100.00} in total fees specifically, a {$50.00} administrative fee and a {$50.00} escheated funds charge. \n\nI never received advance written notice of account closure or escheatment, as required under applicable banking regulations and standard due-process procedures. My mailing and email contact information have remained current at all times. Eastern Banks failure to provide such notice deprived me of the opportunity to take corrective action or reclaim my funds prior to closure. \n\nNotice and Policy Violation Eastern Banks own publicly stated policies and procedures confirm that the Bank is required to notify and contact customers before taking any account-related action, including closure or escheatment. While Eastern may not publish a formal abandoned accounts policy, this internal requirement of customer notice is well established. By closing my account and assessing fees without providing any advance notice, Eastern Bank has violated its own stated procedures and potentially applicable state and federal consumer-protection regulations. \n\nFormal Demand Accordingly, I hereby demand the following : Written documentation of any and all notices Eastern Bank claims to have sent regarding the account closure or escheatment, including the dates, methods of transmission, and addresses or email accounts used ; The governing account agreement ( XXXX ) and fee schedule ( XXXX ) in effect at the time the fees were assessed, and the specific provisions Eastern relies upon to justify the {$50.00} administrative and {$50.00} escheatment fees ; and Immediate refund of {$100.00} representing the improperly assessed fees. \nCompliance and Due-Diligence Notice Massachusetts consumer-protection and unclaimed-property laws require reasonable, documented due-diligence efforts and advance notice before treating funds as unclaimed or escheatable. Any administrative or escheatment fee must be expressly authorized by the operative account agreement and clearly disclosed to the customer. If Eastern can not produce contemporaneous evidence of proper advance notice and contractual authorization, the deductions are unlawful and must be reversed. \n\nBranch Interaction On XX/XX/year>, I personally raised this matter with Branch XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, who provided only a packet of fine print and directed me to read the fine print and visit Easterns website. Such dismissive conduct does not resolve the Banks violation of its notice and due-diligence obligations. I am therefore escalating this to the XXXX team for immediate corrective action. \n\nXXXX XXXX ( XXXX Notice ) This letter constitutes a formal notice to preserve all records relating to this account and matter, including internal communications, correspondence logs, mailing records, system screenshots showing contact information, and all documents reflecting the decision to close or escheat the account. XXXX or alteration of these records XXXX constitute spoliation of evidence. \n\nRegulatory Escalation If I do not receive a written response and full refund of {$100.00} within XXXX ( XXXX ) business days, I will immediately file formal complaints with both the Massachusetts XXXX XXXX Banks and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) for review of Eastern Banks failure to provide proper notice, improper assessment of fees, and breach of internal and regulatory standards.\n\nI expect Eastern Bank to act promptly and in good faith to resolve this matter and to avoid unnecessary escalation. Please confirm receipt of this letter and identify a single point of contact for follow-up communication. \n\nSincerely, XXXX XXXX XXXX : Massachusetts XXXX XXXX Banks Consumer Financial Protection Bureau","date_sent_to_company":"2025-10-27T18:18:15.000Z","issue":"Closing an account","sub_product":"Checking account","zip_code":"02445","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"16845543","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"EASTERN BANKSHARES INC","date_received":"2025-10-27T18:12:55.000Z","state":"MA","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Fees charged for closing account"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I never received advance written notice of account closure or escheatment, as required under <em>applicable</em> banking regulations and standard due-process procedures. My mailing and email contact information <em>have</em> remained current at all times. Eastern Banks failure to provide such notice deprived me of the opportunity to take corrective action or reclaim my funds prior to closure."]},"sort":[11.069065,"16845543"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"13321203","_score":10.922134,"_source":{"product":"Debt collection","complaint_what_happened":"XXXX. Failure to Properly Validate Debt ( XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/year> ) On XX/XX/year>, I sent a debt verification letter to Genesis. In response, Genesis only provided an Original Lease and a very brief eight-line table of charges, without offering further detail or explanation. \nOn XX/XX/year>, I sent a second verification request specifically asking for clarification regarding Genesiss authority to collect the alleged debt ( such as proof of assignment or agency relationship ). Genesis failed to provide any such authorization or justification. \n\nXXXX. Harassment and Misleading Statements During Collection Call ( XX/XX/year> ) On XX/XX/year>, I called Genesis service number and talked with a representative named XXXX XXXX ( collector ). I recorded this call in full compliance with applicable law and have preserved both the complete audio recording and a transcript. During this recorded call : Harassment and Threatening : The collector used an intimidating tone when I requested written documentation, threatening : Well just put it on your credit and then youll see it from Columbia debt, intending to pressure me into immediate payment.\n\nEven after I clearly stated multiple times, I need to go to think about it, the collector persistently refused to end the conversation, pushing aggressively for immediate resolution.\n\nThe collector falsely accused me of yelling ( Why are you yelling? ) when I was not, mischaracterizing my tone to intimidate and belittle me.\n\nThe collector made hostile and disparaging statements implying I was untrustworthy : You didnt pay, so you broke general practice. \n\nMisleading Representations : The collector claimed XXXX, XXXX XXXX, and XXXX were all of us without providing any clarification or documentation of this relationship, even when I specifically asked : if I pay Genesis, how could I know the apartment owner wont go after me again in the future?\n\nWhen I requested written confirmation before making any payment, the collector refused, stating I would only receive documentation after payment. \nThe collector further misrepresented the nature of debt validation by dismissing my reference to consumer rights, saying Internet is not always right and implying that the information I cited was not factual. \n\nXXXX. Provision of a Non-Functional Payment Website ( XX/XX/year> ) On XX/XX/year>, the same representative from Genesis sent me an email directing me to pay through a specific website requiring registration. When I attempted to proceed, the system responded with the following error message : Account Finding Failure Were sorry, we could not find your account. Our staff has been emailed to see if we can locate your account for you with the information youve provided. Well be in touch as soon as we can find your account!\n\nDespite the websites claim that their staff would contact me, no follow-up was ever provided. \nI attempted the registration process twice, but both attempts failed. \n\nXXXX. Subsequent Conduct and Failure to Respond to Dispute ( XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX ) On XX/XX/year>, when I called XXXX again, the operator transferred me immediately back to the same aggressive representative without informing me or offering an alternative representative, preventing reasonable communication and resolution. \nThat same day, I sent Genesis a formal dispute letter specifically stating two issues : 1. Harassment during a collection call ; and 2. Provision of a fake or non-functional payment website. \n\nDespite this formal notice, as of XX/XX/year>, Genesis had not responded to my dispute.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-05-13T20:33:07.000Z","issue":"Took or threatened to take negative or legal action","sub_product":"Rental debt","zip_code":"122XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"13321203","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Rowland Avenue Management, Inc. A/KA Columbia Debt Recovery, LLC d/b/a Genesis","date_received":"2025-05-03T22:21:02.000Z","state":"NY","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Threatened or suggested your credit would be damaged"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I recorded this call in full <em>compliance</em> with <em>applicable</em> law and <em>have</em> <em>preserved</em> <em>both</em> the complete audio recording and a transcript. During this recorded call : Harassment and Threatening : The collector used an intimidating tone when I requested written documentation, threatening : Well just put it on your credit and then youll see it from Columbia debt, intending to pressure me into immediate payment."]},"sort":[10.922134,"13321203"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"4138091","_score":10.77541,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"I have requested that Early Warning Service provide with documentation and information from the alleged bank that is reporting to their company. I have yet to receive that information from Early Warning Service. I have yet to receive a response from your company. \n\nPlease also be advised that a verbal confirmation from XXXX  XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX does not suffice as proof of validation. If this matter is not resolved within the next fifteen ( 15 ) business days, I will take further steps to preserve my rights. \n\nIt has been 30 days since I sent my initial validation request and I have not received a reply. As there has been no communication from you, I must conclude that you do not have the information available to validate the CLOSED FOR PURGE from XXXX  XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX. Because the CLOSED FOR PURGE remains on my Early Warning file, I must also conclude that you are reporting this information in error. \nPlease be aware that your failure to respond to my request is a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, as is the continued listing of inaccurate and unverifiable information in my file. Unless I am notified otherwise within 30 days from your receipt of this notice, I will conclude that you and [ name of bank ] have waived all claims in this matter and that the issue is permanently closed. \nLikewise, if the CLOSED FOR PURGE is not removed from my Early Warning file, I will file suit in small claims court to retrieve damages for your ongoing violation of the FCRA. \nPlease note that this communication, for the purposes of 15 USC 1692 et seq., has the same effect as a dispute to the validity of the alleged debt. This communication is also a dispute to the validity of your claims pertaining to CLOSED FOR PURGE. \nThis communication has been sent in an attempt to correct your records and to preserve my rights underneath the FCRA. Any information obtained from you will be collected as evidence should this matter remain unresolved. Please note that this letter is a request for information only, and is not a statement, election, or waiver of status. \n\n\nNotice to whom it be of concern, It is YOU I hold accountable and accuse of complicity in exercise of malevolent did-compliance. I hereby mark you as likely one that I might one day view in civil discord as the \" would be plaintiffs '', yet I declare to you your unjust claim is to be met with deliberate and determined resistance and counteraction. In is in clarity that your Claim of Non-Medical debt Collection is insufficient for collections much less reporting. You MUST DELETE this unjust injurious allegation because it is significantly deficient of the requisite certified reporting compliance ( such as perfect metro 2 format reporting ) and testimonial evidence of the PHYSICALY VERIFIABLE PROOF OF VALIDATION as related to the full truth, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, ownership, identity of true debtor, dates, balances, audits, calculations, source codes, creditor collection code, XXXX XXXX statement and its associated trailing fragments, the minimal five portioned personal identifiers, the pay statuses, the required XXXX of confirmation to collection, and elsewise standard or mandatory for proper reporting, mentioned or not. \n\nAlthough I am checking for and addressing missing and or deficient aspects of REPORTING COMPLIANCES and not contesting any debt of compliant nature, I should make you aware that since unlawful reporting transitions collection into an equally not complaint circumstance. Being still yet not validated by document fact in compliance to requisite standards, it is to be announced yet again that legally I have no knowledge of the validity of the alleged claims of delinquency and or derogatory nature, nor of the certifiably compliant matter to either any of its collection attempts and or its reporting despite previous consumer filed composed complaints checking for each. Might it be known, especially shall I elect to take this matter up to a civil court, any debt and or derogatory claim must be pursued ( particularly for collection ) in a very defined and precisely compliant and physically verifiable or certifiable manner as detailed in the requisite obeyed federal and state collection and reporting regulations associated with any of the above noted said claim ( s ) to include but not limited to the FCBA, FCRA, HIPAA PRIVACY RULE, FACTA, FDCPA and TCPA, etc. ADDITIONALLY, if an entity acts as a collector and also elects to act as a reporting party of consumer credit they must as well adhere to every single one even each any and all of the regulatory reporting requisites and standards of reporting with legal standing in full accordance of laws and accepted reporting standards. To date, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any capacity or willingness to validate the alleged debt much less certify the fair, accurate, complete and compliant reporting of the claims, particularly being significantly deficient is any display of certified metro 2 compliance. As such, given the fact of recent breaches of information collection repositories, I am hesitating to readily accept what is presented without testimonial and certified physically verifiable document evidence of claim as being legitimate. I deny nothing, yet I reserve the right to question any unproven claim. I do NOT accept the statement of claim of the plaintiff and I call for the court to reject their claim as untrue, unverified, incomplete, not compliant or otherwise invalid and thereby reject-able and dischargeable which requirement to be dismissed in full. I demand said court resolution today, even here and now in full accords of regulatory statutes, mentioned by me or not. \n\n1 ) To date, I have received no knowledge of ever entering into any contractual relationship with the to-be plaintiff ( s ) { should I forward into a civil complaint } or with the entity ( ies ) that allegedly issued against me the defaulted line of credit ( s ) or accusations similar. This despite repeated calls to the accusers to demonstrate the requisite presented physically verifiable document proof of adequately acquired permissible purpose from the exactly and only individual irrefutably identified as being me. I have no acknowledgement of a relationship with the parties mentioned, in any form. \n\nXXXX ) I have no knowledge of ever knowingly acknowledging ( or even unknowingly doing so ) that I owe any proven and compliantly reported debt, much less the claim of unproven debt alleged in this written declaration CHECKING for not only VALIDITY of CLAIMS but also DOCUMENT PROOF IN CERTIFIABLE TESTIMONY as to the factual and complete COMPLIANCE to all standards and laws, even the mandatory Metro 2 Format Compliance. Its obvious that the allegations filed by the accusers ( or to-be plaintiff ) are in clear subterfuge of act, be it in willful disregard of ethical practices or be it done so in ignorance of requisite ethical and regulatory compliant behavior during their accusations, collection efforts and credit reporting of claims. The vile nature of their derelict is unjustly injurious and unlawful no doubt. I again call for a dismissal of to-be plaintiffs statement of claim ( s ) and discharge of misreported delinquencies and derogatory behavior that the accusers complaint is undeniably unfairly lodged versus me. \n\n3 ) I have no knowledge of ever receiving any proven or document facts in statement of account or account aspects for these items of alleged debt and delinquent actions. Again, I reiterate I have called on the accusers to present to be document certifiably true, correct, complete, and adequately compliant documentation in full validation of claims, rights to collect alleged claims, and rights to report alleged claims. Let it be true that COMPLIANCE of regulatory requisites is MANDATORY not OPTIONAL. Plaintiffs claims are mute of legal standing in full accordance of law and must be dismissed. \n\n4 ) I have no knowledge of ever entering into an open account with to-be Plaintiff ( s ) or with the entity ( ies ) that allegedly issued me the defaulted line of credit ( s ) or derogatory claims of credit. \n\n5 ) FACT IS, no claim above has even submitted adequate compliant proof of the genesis of any consumer/creditor relationship and their inability to prove application, permissible purpose for said alleged application, consumer/creditor agreement in contract describing a relationship related to alleged claim of account and or debt ( s ), and or otherwise derelict documentation of claim ( s ) inherently makes invalid the to-be Plaintiffs whole statement of claim in this summons or complaint. I request court to resolve adequately and compliantly as required with the immediate eradication of complaint charge ( s ) and rectification of any injurious collection or reporting practices. Again, COMPLIANCE of APPROPRIATE COLLECTION PRACTICES and equally COMPLIANCE of APPROPRIATE and COMPLETE REPORTING PRACTICES is MANDATORY, NOT OPTIONAL. \n\n6 ) As it stands, until PROVEN OTHERWISE, the complaining to-be Plaintiff ( s ) does so unjustly, unethically, and likely illegally so in absolute deficiency of requisite legal standing in full accordance of applicable laws ( mentioned or not ), both to collection practices and as well with reporting practices, particularly in the inability or unwillingness to timely and fully certify physically verifiable document proof in full validity of debt claim or compliance of reporting, even to the mandatory Metro 2 format. As such, here again I declare my right and preference to stand against all claims of the to-be Plaintiff ( s ) and call on your authority and INTEGRITY to ensure truth of claim, correctness of claim, completeness of claim, ownership and responsibility of any debt ( s ) or delinquencies of debt alleged in above noted claim ( s ), perfect and prove-able compliance of collection actions related to claim ( s ), and compliance of reporting actions related to claim ( s ) ... ... ... ... ... ... ..","date_sent_to_company":"2021-02-13T17:22:25.000Z","issue":"Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"30344","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"4138091","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Early Warning Services, LLC","date_received":"2021-02-13T17:01:59.000Z","state":"GA","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Their investigation did not fix an error on your report"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Again, <em>COMPLIANCE</em> of APPROPRIATE COLLECTION PRACTICES and equally <em>COMPLIANCE</em> of APPROPRIATE and COMPLETE REPORTING PRACTICES is MANDATORY, NOT OPTIONAL. \n\n6 ) As it stands, until PROVEN OTHERWISE, the complaining to-be Plaintiff ( s ) does so unjustly, unethically, and likely illegally so in absolute deficiency of requisite legal standing in full accordance of <em>applicable</em> laws ( mentioned or not ), <em>both</em> to collection practices and as well with reporting practices, particularly in the inability or"]},"sort":[10.77541,"4138091"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"13143241","_score":10.671247,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"I am writing as a consumer under the rights provided to me by the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), 15 U.S.C. 16811681x, and the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act ( FACTA ). This statement serves as both a formal dispute and a goodwill request regarding several derogatory accounts and unauthorized hard inquiries that appeared on my credit report during a period in which I was the victim of fraud and potential identity theft. \n\n\n\nLegal Basis for Dispute ( FCRA Compliance Requirements ) : Under FCRA 602 ( A ) and 607 ( b ), furnishers must ensure the maximum possible accuracy of all credit-related data. \nIf information is found to be inaccurate, unverifiable, or unauthorized, FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) requires that it be deleted from the consumers file within 30 days of dispute. \nIf verified, the furnisher must provide supporting documentation used in the verification process ( FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 6 ) ( B ) ( iii ) ). \n\n\n\nAccounts in Dispute : 1. XXXX XXXX XXXX 9 late payments reported to TransUnion, 2 late payments to Experian. \nAccount # XXXX 2. XXXX XXXX Reported as charged-off across all three bureaus. \nAccount # XXXX 3. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX  Active collection for {$1000.00} reported across all bureaus. \nAccount # XXXX These accounts reflect derogatory activity during the timeframe I was experiencing unauthorized access and identity compromise. I believe the negative entries are inaccurate, outdated, or unfairly damaging, and I am requesting that they either be : Deleted from my credit profile with Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion, Or re-aged to reflect a current, positive status ( Pays As Agreed ). \n\n\n\nGoodwill Consideration Request : Regardless of whether the entries were validated internally, I respectfully request a goodwill adjustment to correct these negative entries. I have otherwise maintained a responsible credit history and would like to preserve a positive relationship with your organization. \n\nPlease do not close or restrict these accounts, and refrain from labeling them as disputed, as I continue to maintain my account standing and relationship in good faith. \n\n\n\nUnauthorized Hard Inquiries : I also request immediate removal of the following hard inquiries, which I did not authorize : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/year> These inquiries have negatively impacted my credit score and were made without my permission. \n\n\n\nSupporting Documents Attached : FTC Identity Theft Affidavit and Police Report Government-issued ID Requested Action : Delete or correct all inaccurate or unverifiable derogatory items. \nRemove unauthorized hard inquiries. \nRe-age applicable accounts to show Pays As Agreed status. \nNotify all major credit bureaus ( pursuant to FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 2 ) ) of any updates or deletions. \n\nPlease respond in writing within 30 days as required by FCRA 611 ( a ). If you are unable to honor this request, I request full documentation of how the account or inquiry was verified under FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 6 ) ( B ) ( iii ). \n\nThank you for your time and consideration.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-04-23T17:53:30.000Z","issue":"Improper use of your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"903XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"13143241","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.","date_received":"2025-04-23T17:53:00.000Z","state":"CA","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Reporting company used your report improperly"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I <em>have</em> otherwise maintained a responsible credit history and would like to <em>preserve</em> a positive relationship with your organization. \n\nPlease do not close or restrict these accounts, and refrain from labeling them as disputed, as I continue to maintain my account standing and relationship in good faith."]},"sort":[10.671247,"13143241"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"13143239","_score":10.650403,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"I am writing as a consumer under the rights provided to me by the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), 15 U.S.C. 16811681x, and the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act ( FACTA ). This statement serves as both a formal dispute and a goodwill request regarding several derogatory accounts and unauthorized hard inquiries that appeared on my credit report during a period in which I was the victim of fraud and potential identity theft. \n\n\n\nLegal Basis for Dispute ( FCRA Compliance Requirements ) : Under FCRA 602 ( A ) and 607 ( b ), furnishers must ensure the maximum possible accuracy of all credit-related data. \nIf information is found to be inaccurate, unverifiable, or unauthorized, FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) requires that it be deleted from the consumers file within 30 days of dispute. \nIf verified, the furnisher must provide supporting documentation used in the verification process ( FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 6 ) ( B ) ( iii ) ). \n\n\n\nAccounts in Dispute : 1. XXXX XXXX XXXX 9 late payments reported to TransUnion, 2 late payments to Experian. \nAccount # XXXX 2. XXXX XXXX Reported as charged-off across all three bureaus. \nAccount # XXXX 3. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX  Active collection for {$1000.00} reported across all bureaus. \nAccount # XXXX These accounts reflect derogatory activity during the timeframe I was experiencing unauthorized access and identity compromise. I believe the negative entries are inaccurate, outdated, or unfairly damaging, and I am requesting that they either be : Deleted from my credit profile with Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion, Or re-aged to reflect a current, positive status ( Pays As Agreed ). \n\n\n\nGoodwill Consideration Request : Regardless of whether the entries were validated internally, I respectfully request a goodwill adjustment to correct these negative entries. I have otherwise maintained a responsible credit history and would like to preserve a positive relationship with your organization. \n\nPlease do not close or restrict these accounts, and refrain from labeling them as disputed, as I continue to maintain my account standing and relationship in good faith. \n\n\n\nUnauthorized Hard Inquiries : I also request immediate removal of the following hard inquiries, which I did not authorize : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/year> These inquiries have negatively impacted my credit score and were made without my permission. \n\n\n\nSupporting Documents Attached : FTC Identity Theft Affidavit and Police Report Government-issued ID Requested Action : Delete or correct all inaccurate or unverifiable derogatory items. \nRemove unauthorized hard inquiries. \nRe-age applicable accounts to show Pays As Agreed status. \nNotify all major credit bureaus ( pursuant to FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 2 ) ) of any updates or deletions. \n\nPlease respond in writing within 30 days as required by FCRA 611 ( a ). If you are unable to honor this request, I request full documentation of how the account or inquiry was verified under FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 6 ) ( B ) ( iii ). \n\nThank you for your time and consideration.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-04-23T17:53:27.000Z","issue":"Improper use of your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"903XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"13143239","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"EQUIFAX, INC.","date_received":"2025-04-23T17:53:00.000Z","state":"CA","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Reporting company used your report improperly"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I <em>have</em> otherwise maintained a responsible credit history and would like to <em>preserve</em> a positive relationship with your organization. \n\nPlease do not close or restrict these accounts, and refrain from labeling them as disputed, as I continue to maintain my account standing and relationship in good faith."]},"sort":[10.650403,"13143239"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"13143315","_score":10.6311655,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"I am writing as a consumer under the rights provided to me by the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), 15 U.S.C. 16811681x, and the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act ( FACTA ). This statement serves as both a formal dispute and a goodwill request regarding several derogatory accounts and unauthorized hard inquiries that appeared on my credit report during a period in which I was the victim of fraud and potential identity theft. \n\n\n\nLegal Basis for Dispute ( FCRA Compliance Requirements ) : Under FCRA 602 ( A ) and 607 ( b ), furnishers must ensure the maximum possible accuracy of all credit-related data. \nIf information is found to be inaccurate, unverifiable, or unauthorized, FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) requires that it be deleted from the consumers file within 30 days of dispute. \nIf verified, the furnisher must provide supporting documentation used in the verification process ( FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 6 ) ( B ) ( iii ) ). \n\n\n\nAccounts in Dispute : 1. XXXX XXXX XXXX 9 late payments reported to TransUnion, 2 late payments to Experian. \nAccount # XXXX 2. XXXX XXXX Reported as charged-off across all three bureaus. \nAccount # XXXX 3. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX  Active collection for {$1000.00} reported across all bureaus. \nAccount # XXXX These accounts reflect derogatory activity during the timeframe I was experiencing unauthorized access and identity compromise. I believe the negative entries are inaccurate, outdated, or unfairly damaging, and I am requesting that they either be : Deleted from my credit profile with Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion, Or re-aged to reflect a current, positive status ( Pays As Agreed ). \n\n\n\nGoodwill Consideration Request : Regardless of whether the entries were validated internally, I respectfully request a goodwill adjustment to correct these negative entries. I have otherwise maintained a responsible credit history and would like to preserve a positive relationship with your organization. \n\nPlease do not close or restrict these accounts, and refrain from labeling them as disputed, as I continue to maintain my account standing and relationship in good faith. \n\n\n\nUnauthorized Hard Inquiries : I also request immediate removal of the following hard inquiries, which I did not authorize : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/year> These inquiries have negatively impacted my credit score and were made without my permission. \n\n\n\nSupporting Documents Attached : FTC Identity Theft Affidavit and Police Report Government-issued ID Requested Action : Delete or correct all inaccurate or unverifiable derogatory items. \nRemove unauthorized hard inquiries. \nRe-age applicable accounts to show Pays As Agreed status. \nNotify all major credit bureaus ( pursuant to FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 2 ) ) of any updates or deletions. \n\nPlease respond in writing within 30 days as required by FCRA 611 ( a ). If you are unable to honor this request, I request full documentation of how the account or inquiry was verified under FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 6 ) ( B ) ( iii ). \n\nThank you for your time and consideration.","date_sent_to_company":"2025-04-23T17:53:30.000Z","issue":"Improper use of your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"903XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"13143315","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Experian Information Solutions Inc.","date_received":"2025-04-23T17:42:39.000Z","state":"CA","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Reporting company used your report improperly"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I <em>have</em> otherwise maintained a responsible credit history and would like to <em>preserve</em> a positive relationship with your organization. \n\nPlease do not close or restrict these accounts, and refrain from labeling them as disputed, as I continue to maintain my account standing and relationship in good faith."]},"sort":[10.6311655,"13143315"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"22293833","_score":10.420878,"_source":{"product":"Mortgage","complaint_what_happened":"BANK HAS BEEN IGNORING MY EMAILS AND VOICEMAIL. \n\nThis is the email that I sent to them- U.S. Bank Loss Draft / Mortgage Servicing Department Re : Insurance Claim Delay Loan No. : REDACTED To Whom It May Concern : This letter serves as formal notice of significant and ongoing servicing noncompliance by U.S. Bank regarding the insurance proceeds associated with the abovereferenced property. The claim has remained unresolved for eight months, during which U.S. Bank has released no funds to restore or protect the collateral securing its own mortgage interest. \n\nXXXX XXXX issued two checks in XXXX, payable to the Estate of XXXX XXXX and U.S. Bank. These checks were not cashed, as the amounts are incorrect, disputed, and unusable, and therefore do not constitute acceptance or settlement of the claim particularly given that the property was categorized as a Category XXXX loss. \n\nBeginning this week, attorneys, XXXX XXXX, and I will begin the probate proceedings necessary to close the Estate. As part of those proceedings, we will be informing the court that U.S. Banks failure to release any insurance funds has directly prevented the Estate from rebuilding the property or restoring it to preloss condition. The Estate has complied with every requirement placed upon it. The only barrier to restoration is the banks continued failure to manage the lossdraft process in accordance with federal servicing standards.\n\nDeathScene Hazards and Servicer Liability This was not a routine propertydamage claim. It was a deathscene loss involving decomposition gases, VOCs, airborne biological particulates, and pathogen infiltration throughout the HVAC system, supply vents, return ducts, and structural components of the home. These are federally recognized hazardous conditions that require : full HVAC and duct system evaluation removal of gasabsorbed materials biological decontamination structural restoration where decomposition gases and airborne pathogens penetrated porous building materials XXXX XXXX has refused to address any of these hazards, despite knowing the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX formally declared the property uninhabitable and despite admitting they were aware of the uninhabitable status. \n\nU.S. Bank, as the FHAinsured mortgagee, is obligated under HUD Handbook 4000.1 to : protect and preserve the property ensure timely remediation prevent deterioration of the collateral avoid delays that jeopardize habitability ensure insurance proceeds are released promptly and used to restore the property Eight months of inaction, combined with the failure to release any insurance proceeds, has allowed a hazardous, uninhabitable condition to persist in direct violation of HUD servicing requirements, Regulation X, and the banks duty to protect the FHAinsured asset.\n\nU.S. Bank is now on notice that further delay is not an option.\n\nThe bank is expected to take immediate corrective action within the next several days to protect the collateral, comply with federal servicing standards, and prevent additional regulatory violations. Continued inaction will be documented as part of the active CFPB investigation, the HUD compliance review, and the probate record, and will be attributed directly to U.S. Banks failure to fulfill its mandatory lossdraft obligations.\n\nMunicipal Determination of Uninhabitability We have worked directly with the XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX, which has formally determined that the property is uninhabitable. XXXX XXXX has acknowledged awareness of this determination. \n\nAlthough the Citys Code of Ordinances does not contain a section specific to Category 3 losses, the City has adopted the 2024 editions of the : International Building Code ( IBC ) International Residential Code ( IRC ) International Existing Building Code ( IEBC ) International Property Maintenance Code ( IPMC ) as referenced in Chapter 8, Article III, Section 852.\n\nUnder these adopted codes, any structure deemed unsafe or unfit for habitation can not be occupied until hazards are fully remediated and verified through appropriate inspection and clearance procedures.\n\nBased on the extent of decomposition gases, airborne pathogens, HVAC infiltration, and the duration of uninhabitability, the property may require full structural restoration to meet these code requirements if XXXX XXXX continues to refuse to authorize proper remediation. \n\nUnder FHA 4000.1, the mortgagee must ensure the property is restored to a safe, sound, and marketable condition, and the Citys determination remains in effect until certified remediation and clearance testing are completed.\n\nServicing Violations and Federal Regulatory Exposure U.S. Bank is further reminded of its obligations under : 12 C.F.R. 1024.35 ( b ) ( 11 ) failure to pay insurance or related charges 12 C.F.R. 1024.35 ( b ) ( 7 ) lossmitigation and lossrelated errors 12 C.F.R. 1024.38 ( b ) ( 3 ) accurate records ; avoid delays causing consumer harm 12 C.F.R. 1024.40 ( b ) assign personnel capable of resolving lossrelated issues 12 C.F.R. 1024.41 ( c ) ( 2 ) ( iii ) prohibition on avoidable delays 12 C.F.R. 1024.41 ( a ) reasonable diligence in obtaining lossrelated documents CFPB Bulletin 201312 unreasonable delays in insurance disbursements prohibited CFPB Bulletin 201401 servicers must coordinate with insurers HUD Handbook 4000.1, Section III.A.2.k prompt release of insurance proceeds HUD Handbook 4000.1 , Section III.A.2.h protect and preserve the property HUD Mortgagee Letter 201805 avoid delays jeopardizing habitability HUD Mortgagee Letter 201511 oversight of insurers and timely release of funds HUD Mortgagee Letter 201323 proper handling of insurance proceeds U.S. Banks failure to release any funds for eight months, combined with its failure to ensure XXXX XXXX provides a usable evaluation, places the bank in direct conflict with these federal requirements.\n\nGiven the active CFPB complaint, U.S. Banks responsibilities under Regulation X, and the HUD lossdraft servicing requirements applicable to mortgagees, the bank is now on notice that continued delay will be documented as part of both the probate record and the federal regulatory review already underway.\n\nRequired Written Response Accordingly, I require written confirmation of the following without delay : 1. Whether U.S. Bank has contacted XXXX XXXX regarding the disputed and stale XXXX checks. \n2. Whether U.S. Bank has escalated this matter internally given the federal regulatory oversight now in place.\n\n3. What specific, immediate steps U.S. Bank will take to ensure the lossdraft process moves forward within the next several days, consistent with 12 C.F.R. 1024.35, 1024.38, 1024.40, 1024.41, and HUD Handbook 4000.1.\n\n4. Whether U.S. Bank intends to comply with its FHA obligations to protect and preserve the collateral given the municipal uninhabitability determination and confirmed biohazards.\n\n5. What correctiveaction plan U.S. Bank will implement to prevent further deterioration of the FHAinsured asset.\n\nThe Estate can not remain open indefinitely to accommodate insurer or servicer delays. We expect U.S. Bank to act promptly to protect the collateral and comply with all applicable servicing standards. \n\nSincerely, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Executor, Estate of XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2026-05-18T02:00:52.000Z","issue":"Trouble during payment process","sub_product":"FHA mortgage","zip_code":"55443","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"22293833","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"U.S. BANCORP","date_received":"2026-05-18T01:51:02.000Z","state":"MN","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Trying to communicate with the company to fix an issue while managing or servicing your loan"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Continued inaction will be documented as part of the active CFPB investigation, the HUD <em>compliance</em> review, and the probate record, and will be attributed directly to U.S. Banks failure to fulfill its mandatory lossdraft obligations.\n\nMunicipal Determination of Uninhabitability We <em>have</em> worked directly with the XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX, which has formally determined that the property is uninhabitable. XXXX XXXX has acknowledged awareness of this determination."]},"sort":[10.420878,"22293833"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"14933202","_score":9.972781,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"FINAL NOTICE AND WARNING Date : XX/XX/XXXXXXXX  To : Experian Dispute Department XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, TX XXXX Subject : FINAL NOTICE Demand for Immediate Removal of Unauthorized Hard Inquiries/ Unresolved Legal Noncompliance To Whom It May Concern, This letter serves as my final formal demand for the immediate removal of unauthorized hard inquiries from my Experian credit report. I initially submitted a formal dispute regarding these inquiries on XX/XX/XXXX. As of today, XX/XX/XXXX, more than 45 days have passed exceeding the maximum legal window of 30 days permitted under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), 15 U.S. Code 1681i ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ). \n\nYou have failed to act, failed to validate the inquiries, and failed to provide any conclusive resolution. Therefore, this matter is no longer under investigation we are now in a state of legal noncompliance. \n\nFEDERAL VIOLATIONS Experian is currently in breach of the following federal statutes : 1. 15 U.S. Code 1681b Permissible Purpose of Credit Inquiries No valid permissible purpose exists for the inquiries listed below. You have not demonstrated any consumer-initiated relationship or prior authorization as required by law.\n\n2. 15 U.S. Code 1681i ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) Timely Reinvestigation This law requires credit reporting agencies to complete a reinvestigation within 30 days. The clock started on XX/XX/XXXX, and expired on XX/XX/XXXX. You are in violation of this requirement. \n3. 15 U.S. Code 1681i ( a ) ( 5 ) ( A ) Deletion of Unverified Information If you can not verify an inquiry within 30 days, you must delete it. You failed to do so.\n\n4. 15 U.S. Code 1681n and 1681o Civil Liability Your inaction exposes Experian to civil liability for both willful and negligent noncompliance. I have preserved all relevant documentation and reserve the right to pursue legal remedies.\n\n5. Obstruction of Rights Your platforms restriction of online dispute capabilities adds to this failure, further obstructing my ability to exercise my legal rights as a consumer.\n\nXXXX  AND XXXX  COMPLIANCE For the record, XXXX  and XXXX both completed reinvestigations and removed the same inquiries without delay. This confirms that : The inquiries were unauthorized, The disputes were legitimate, and Experians failure to act is isolated, unjustified, and unlawful. \n\nLIST OF UNAUTHORIZED INQUIRIES TO BE REMOVED XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX EXPERIAN XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX To resolve this matter fairly and lawfully, I require that Experian : 1. Immediately remove all listed unauthorized inquiries from my credit file 2. Issue written confirmation of removal within seven ( 7 ) business days 3. Restore full access to your online dispute platform 4. Acknowledge that this issue is closed and no negative impact remains Should any inquiry listed above have affected my credit applications or scoring, I expect that Experian will assist in correcting any resulting damage with applicable third parties. \n\n\n\nFINAL WARNING FAILURE TO COMPLY If I do not receive full resolution and written confirmation by XX/XX/XXXX, I will : Proceed with litigation under 15 U.S. Code 1681n and 1681o Submit additional documentation to strengthen my formal complaints filed with the CFPB and FTC Seek damages for : Emotional distress Reputational harm Lost credit opportunities Legal fees You are now formally and finally on legal notice. \n\nSincerely, XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2025-07-28T13:16:58.000Z","issue":"Improper use of your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"320XX","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"14933202","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Experian Information Solutions Inc.","date_received":"2025-07-28T13:03:15.000Z","state":"FL","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Credit inquiries on your report that you don't recognize"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["Code 1681n and 1681o Civil Liability Your inaction exposes Experian to civil liability for <em>both</em> willful and negligent noncompliance. I <em>have</em> <em>preserved</em> all relevant documentation and reserve the right to pursue legal remedies.\n\n5. Obstruction of Rights Your platforms restriction of online dispute capabilities adds to this failure, further obstructing my ability to exercise my legal rights as a consumer."]},"sort":[9.972781,"14933202"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"16847977","_score":9.969741,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, TX XXXXXXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, PA XXXX Equifax Information Services LLC XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, GA XXXX RE : Formal Dispute and Demand for Immediate Deletion of Inaccurate Information Reported by XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ) To Whom It May Concern : I am writing to formally dispute inaccurate, misleading, and legally non-compliant information appearing on my consumer credit report ( s ) as furnished by XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. ( XXXX  ). This letter serves as my official notice under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., demanding the immediate investigation and deletion of the disputed items identified herein. \n\nI. Inaccurate Account Information Reported by XXXX The information reported by XXXX contains multiple material inaccuracies that have caused substantial harm to my creditworthiness and financial reputation. Specifically, XXXX has reported the following inaccurate information : Account Balance Discrepancies : The account balance ( s ) reported by XXXX are demonstrably incorrect and do not reflect the actual amount owed, if any. These inaccurate balance figures misrepresent my financial obligations and have negatively impacted my credit score and ability to obtain credit on favorable terms. \nPersonal Information Errors : XXXX has furnished incorrect personal identifying information, including but not limited to errors in my name, address, Social Security number, date of birth, or employment information. Such inaccuracies raise serious concerns about the integrity of XXXX 's data management systems and compliance with the FCRA 's accuracy requirements under 15 U.S.C. 1681e ( b ). \nXXXX. Violations of Statute of Limitations and Improper Sale of Time-Barred Debt XXXX has violated applicable statutes of limitations by selling and/or continuing to report account information that is time-barred under state law. By selling this time-barred debt to third-party debt purchasers and collection agencies, XXXX has engaged in conduct that perpetuates the reporting of obsolete information and facilitates potential illegal collection activities. This practice violates the spirit and intent of both the FCRA and state consumer protection laws, as it enables third parties to profit from debts that are no longer legally enforceable. XXXXXXXX XXXX  sale of such accounts for its own financial benefit, with knowledge that the statute of limitations has expired, constitutes a deceptive trade practice and an abuse of the credit reporting system. \nXXXX. Violations of the Seven-Year Reporting Rule Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681c ( a ) ( 4 ), consumer reporting agencies are prohibited from reporting accounts placed for collection or charged off that antedate the report by more than seven years. XXXX has violated this statutory mandate by reporting account information that exceeds the permissible seven-year reporting period. The continued reporting of obsolete negative information beyond the statutory time limit is unlawful and has caused me ongoing harm by artificially depressing my credit score and limiting my access to credit, employment, and housing opportunities. \nMoreover, XXXXXXXX XXXX reporting of inaccurate balance information in connection with these time-barred accounts compounds the violation by creating the false impression that these debts remain active and enforceable, when in fact they should have been removed from my credit report entirely. \nIV. Applicable Legal Standards and Requirements The Fair Credit Reporting Act imposes strict obligations on both furnishers of information and consumer reporting agencies to ensure the accuracy and completeness of reported information. Under 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ), XXXX, as a furnisher, is required to provide accurate information to consumer reporting agencies and to conduct reasonable investigations when notified of disputes. \nAdditionally, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681i, you, as consumer reporting agencies, are required to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation of disputed information within thirty ( 30 ) days of receipt of this dispute. If the information can not be verified as accurate and complete, it must be promptly deleted from my credit file. \nV. Documented Harm and Damages The inaccurate information reported by XXXX has caused me substantial and quantifiable harm, including but not limited to : Significant reduction in my credit score, resulting in denial of credit applications and/or approval only at substantially higher interest rates ; Increased cost of credit, insurance premiums, and other financial products due to artificially depressed credit scores ; Potential adverse employment decisions, as many employers review credit reports as part of the hiring process ; Emotional distress, anxiety, and reputational damage resulting from the false portrayal of my creditworthiness ; Time and expense incurred in identifying, investigating, and disputing these inaccuracies. \nVI. Demand for Immediate Deletion In light of the foregoing violations and inaccuracies, I demand that you immediately : XXXX. Conduct a thorough investigation of all information reported by XXXX as required under 15 U.S.C. 1681i ; 2. Delete all inaccurate, unverifiable, or obsolete information reported by XXXX from my credit file ; XXXX. Remove any and all accounts that violate the seven-year reporting rule pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681c ; 4. Provide me with written confirmation of the deletion of all disputed items within the statutory thirty ( XXXX ) day period ; XXXX. Furnish me with an updated copy of my credit report reflecting the deletions, at no charge, as required under 15 U.S.C. 1681j ( a ) ( 1 ) ( B ). \nXXXX. Preservation of Legal Rights Please be advised that I am preserving all legal rights and remedies available to me under federal and state law, including but not limited to the right to pursue statutory and actual damages under the FCRA. Should you fail to conduct a reasonable investigation, fail to delete the inaccurate information, or fail to respond within the statutory time frame, I will consider all available legal options, including filing a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) and pursuing litigation to vindicate my rights. \nThis letter constitutes my formal written dispute under 15 U.S.C. 1681i ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ). I expect full compliance with all FCRA requirements and prompt resolution of this matter. \n\nRespectfully submitted, XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2025-10-27T17:47:16.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"759XX","tags":"Servicemember","has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"16847977","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"EQUIFAX, INC.","date_received":"2025-10-27T17:46:46.000Z","state":"TX","company_public_response":null,"sub_issue":"Account information incorrect"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I expect full <em>compliance</em> with all FCRA requirements and prompt resolution of this matter. \n\nRespectfully submitted, XXXX XXXX"]},"sort":[9.969741,"16847977"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"16847936","_score":9.969741,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"XX/XX/XXXX Experian XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, TX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, PA XXXX Equifax XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, GA XXXX RE : Formal Dispute and Demand for Immediate Deletion of Inaccurate Information Reported by XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ) To Whom It May Concern : I am writing to formally dispute inaccurate, misleading, and legally non-compliant information appearing on my consumer credit report ( XXXX ) as furnished by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ). This letter serves as my official notice under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., demanding the immediate investigation and deletion of the disputed items identified herein. \n\nI. Inaccurate Account Information Reported by XXXX The information reported by XXXX contains multiple material inaccuracies that have caused substantial harm to my creditworthiness and financial reputation. Specifically, XXXX has reported the following inaccurate information : Account Balance Discrepancies : The account balance ( XXXX ) reported by XXXX are demonstrably incorrect and do not reflect the actual amount owed, if any. These inaccurate balance figures misrepresent my financial obligations and have negatively impacted my credit score and ability to obtain credit on favorable terms. \nPersonal Information Errors : XXXX has furnished incorrect personal identifying information, including but not limited to errors in my name, address, Social Security number, date of birth, or employment information. Such inaccuracies raise serious concerns about the integrity of XXXX 's data management systems and compliance with the FCRA 's accuracy requirements under 15 U.S.C. 1681e ( b ).\n\nII. Violations of Statute of Limitations and Improper Sale of XXXX XXXX XXXX has violated applicable statutes of limitations by selling and/or continuing to report account information that is time-barred under state law. By selling this time-barred debt to third-party debt purchasers and collection agencies, XXXX has engaged in XXXX that perpetuates the reporting of obsolete information and facilitates potential illegal collection activities. This practice violates the spirit and intent of both the FCRA and state consumer protection laws, as it enables third parties to profit from debts that are no longer legally enforceable. XXXX 's sale of such accounts for its own financial benefit, with knowledge that the statute of limitations has expired, constitutes a deceptive trade practice and an abuse of the credit reporting system.\n\nIII. Violations of the Seven-Year Reporting Rule Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681c ( a ) ( 4 ), consumer reporting agencies are prohibited from reporting accounts placed for collection or charged off that antedate the report by more than seven years. XXXX has violated this statutory mandate by reporting account information that exceeds the permissible seven-year reporting period. The continued reporting of obsolete negative information beyond the statutory time limit is unlawful and has caused me ongoing harm by artificially depressing my credit score and limiting my access to credit, employment, and housing opportunities. \nMoreover, XXXX 's reporting of inaccurate balance information in connection with these time-barred accounts compounds the violation by creating the false impression that these debts remain active and enforceable, when in fact they should have been removed from my credit report entirely. \nIV. Applicable Legal Standards and Requirements The Fair Credit Reporting Act imposes strict obligations on both furnishers of information and consumer reporting agencies to ensure the accuracy and completeness of reported information. Under 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ), XXXX, XXXX a furnisher, is required to provide accurate information to consumer reporting agencies and to conduct reasonable investigations when notified of disputes. \nAdditionally, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681i, you, as consumer reporting agencies, are required to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation of disputed information within thirty ( 30 ) days of receipt of this dispute. If the information can not be verified as accurate and complete, it must be promptly deleted from my credit file. \nV. Documented Harm and Damages The inaccurate information reported by XXXX has caused me substantial and quantifiable harm, including but not limited to : Significant reduction in my credit score, resulting in denial of credit applications and/or approval only at substantially higher interest rates ; Increased cost of credit, insurance premiums, and other financial products due to artificially depressed credit scores ; Potential adverse employment decisions, as many employers review credit reports as part of the hiring process ; Emotional distress, XXXX, and reputational damage resulting from the false portrayal of my creditworthiness ; Time and expense incurred in identifying, investigating, and disputing these inaccuracies.\n\nVI. Demand for Immediate Deletion In light of the foregoing violations and inaccuracies, I demand that you immediately : 1. Conduct a thorough investigation of all information reported by XXXX as required under 15 U.S.C. 1681i ; 2. Delete all inaccurate, unverifiable, or obsolete information reported by XXXX from my credit file ; XXXX. Remove any and all accounts that violate the seven-year reporting rule pursuant to XXXX XXXX. XXXX ; XXXX. Provide me with written confirmation of the deletion of all disputed items within the statutory thirty ( 30 ) day period ; 5. Furnish me with an updated copy of my credit report reflecting the deletions, at no charge, as required under 15 U.S.C. 1681j ( a ) ( 1 ) ( B ).\n\nVII. Preservation of Legal Rights Please be advised that I am preserving all legal rights and remedies available to me under federal and state law, including but not limited to the right to pursue statutory and actual damages under the FCRA. Should you fail to conduct a reasonable investigation, fail to delete the inaccurate information, or fail to respond within the statutory time frame, I will consider all available legal options, including filing a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) and pursuing litigation to vindicate my rights.\n\nThis letter constitutes my formal written dispute under 15 U.S.C. 1681i ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ). I expect full compliance with all FCRA requirements and prompt resolution of this matter. \n\nRespectfully submitted, XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2025-10-27T16:45:59.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"759XX","tags":"Servicemember","has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"16847936","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Experian Information Solutions Inc.","date_received":"2025-10-27T16:45:33.000Z","state":"TX","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Account information incorrect"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I expect full <em>compliance</em> with all FCRA requirements and prompt resolution of this matter. \n\nRespectfully submitted, XXXX XXXX"]},"sort":[9.969741,"16847936"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"16847974","_score":9.409857,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX, TX XXXX TransUnion Consumer Solutions XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, GA XXXX RE : Formal Dispute and Demand for Immediate Deletion of Inaccurate Information Reported by XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. ( XXXX ) To Whom It May Concern : I am writing to formally dispute inaccurate, misleading, and legally non-compliant information appearing on my consumer credit report ( s ) as furnished by XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ). This letter serves as my official notice under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., demanding the immediate investigation and deletion of the disputed items identified herein. \n\nI. Inaccurate Account Information Reported by XXXX The information reported by XXXX contains multiple material inaccuracies that have caused substantial harm to my creditworthiness and financial reputation. Specifically, XXXX has reported the following inaccurate information : Account Balance Discrepancies : The account balance ( s ) reported by XXXX are demonstrably incorrect and do not reflect the actual amount owed, if any. These inaccurate balance figures misrepresent my financial obligations and have negatively impacted my credit score and ability to obtain credit on favorable terms. \nPersonal Information Errors : XXXX has furnished incorrect personal identifying information, including but not limited to errors in my name, address, Social Security number, date of birth, or employment information. Such inaccuracies raise serious concerns about the integrity of XXXX 's data management systems and compliance with the FCRA 's accuracy requirements under 15 U.S.C. 1681e ( b ). \nXXXX. Violations of Statute of Limitations and Improper Sale of Time-Barred Debt XXXX has violated applicable statutes of limitations by selling and/or continuing to report account information that is time-barred under state law. By selling this time-barred debt to third-party debt purchasers and collection agencies, XXXX has engaged in conduct that perpetuates the reporting of obsolete information and facilitates potential illegal collection activities. This practice violates the spirit and intent of both the FCRA and state consumer protection laws, as it enables third parties to profit from debts that are no longer legally enforceable. XXXXXXXX XXXX sale of such accounts for its own financial benefit, with knowledge that the statute of limitations has expired, constitutes a deceptive trade practice and an abuse of the credit reporting system. \nXXXX. Violations of the Seven-Year Reporting Rule Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681c ( a ) ( 4 ), consumer reporting agencies are prohibited from reporting accounts placed for collection or charged off that antedate the report by more than seven years. XXXX has violated this statutory mandate by reporting account information that exceeds the permissible seven-year reporting period. The continued reporting of obsolete negative information beyond the statutory time limit is unlawful and has caused me ongoing harm by artificially depressing my credit score and limiting my access to credit, employment, and housing opportunities. \nMoreover, XXXX 's reporting of inaccurate balance information in connection with these time-barred accounts compounds the violation by creating the false impression that these debts remain active and enforceable, when in fact they should have been removed from my credit report entirely. \nIV. Applicable Legal Standards and Requirements The Fair Credit Reporting Act imposes strict obligations on both furnishers of information and consumer reporting agencies to ensure the accuracy and completeness of reported information. Under 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ), XXXX, as a furnisher, is required to provide accurate information to consumer reporting agencies and to conduct reasonable investigations when notified of disputes. \nAdditionally, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681i, you, as consumer reporting agencies, are required to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation of disputed information within thirty ( 30 ) days of receipt of this dispute. If the information can not be verified as accurate and complete, it must be promptly deleted from my credit file. \nV. Documented Harm and Damages The inaccurate information reported by XXXX has caused me substantial and quantifiable harm, including but not limited to : Significant reduction in my credit score, resulting in denial of credit applications and/or approval only at substantially higher interest rates ; Increased cost of credit, insurance premiums, and other financial products due to artificially depressed credit scores ; Potential adverse employment decisions, as many employers review credit reports as part of the hiring process ; Emotional distress, anxiety, and reputational damage resulting from the false portrayal of my creditworthiness ; Time and expense incurred in identifying, investigating, and disputing these inaccuracies. \nVI. Demand for Immediate Deletion In light of the foregoing violations and inaccuracies, I demand that you immediately : XXXX. Conduct a thorough investigation of all information reported by XXXX as required under 15 U.S.C. 1681i ; 2. Delete all inaccurate, unverifiable, or obsolete information reported by XXXX from my credit file ; XXXX. Remove any and all accounts that violate the seven-year reporting rule pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681c ; XXXX. Provide me with written confirmation of the deletion of all disputed items within the statutory thirty ( 30 ) day period ; XXXX. Furnish me with an updated copy of my credit report reflecting the deletions, at no charge, as required under 15 U.S.C. 1681j ( a ) ( 1 ) ( B ). \nXXXX. Preservation of Legal Rights Please be advised that I am preserving all legal rights and remedies available to me under federal and state law, including but not limited to the right to pursue statutory and actual damages under the FCRA. Should you fail to conduct a reasonable investigation, fail to delete the inaccurate information, or fail to respond within the statutory time frame, I will consider all available legal options, including filing a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) and pursuing litigation to vindicate my rights. \nThis letter constitutes my formal written dispute under 15 U.S.C. 1681i ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ). I expect full compliance with all FCRA requirements and prompt resolution of this matter. \n\nRespectfully submitted, XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2025-10-27T17:47:16.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"759XX","tags":"Servicemember","has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"16847974","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.","date_received":"2025-10-27T17:46:46.000Z","state":"TX","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Account information incorrect"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I expect full <em>compliance</em> with all FCRA requirements and prompt resolution of this matter. \n\nRespectfully submitted, XXXX XXXX"]},"sort":[9.409857,"16847974"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"2628044","_score":9.39057,"_source":{"product":"Mortgage","complaint_what_happened":"Specialized Loan Servicing did not follow the appropriate rules and regulations governing approving the Deed-In-Lieu of Foreclosure requested and denied the request and forcding a foreclosure on the property. We previously had to request assistance from the CFPB to assist us with SLS and the original Loan Modification. We are requesting assistance to have SLS approve the Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure request. Referenced regulations : On XX/XX/XXXX, XXXX XXXX issued an Announcement ( XXXX ) requiring servicers to protect the priority of the mortgage lien and to clear all liens for delinquent homeowners association ( HOA ) dues and condo assessments, on properties acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The Policy changes specified in this Announcement are effective XX/XX/XXXX but servicers are encourages to implement them as soon as possible. Servicers must follow the policies outlined on this announcement for all conventional mortgage loans held in, or purchased from XXXX XXXX portfolio but securitized in XXXX pools, or have special or regular servicing option, or a shared-risk XXXX pool with XXXX XXXX or Servicer marketing the acquired property, or other loans sold to XXXX XXXX under recourse or other credit enhancement arrangements. XXXX XXXX XXXX are required to advance funds when notified by an HOA for a PUD or condo project that borrower is 60 days delinquent in the payments, or charges levied by association inorder to protect the priority of XXXX XXXX  mortgage lien. Reimbursements for such advances may be provided to the servicer for up to 6 months in certain states. In addition, Servicers are currently required to ensure any priority liens for delinquent HOA dues and assessments on acquired properties are cleared immediately, but no later than 30 days after the foreclosure sale or acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Servicers must take steps to protect the priority of the mortgage lien for properties located in states providing priority for assessment liens over a previously-recorded mortgage document. Servicer must determine the amount to be paid in order to clear the associations claim of lien when pursuing foreclosure. The amount is generally the lowest of : The actual delinquent assessment balance and allowed costs The maximum amount due from the foreclosing first mortgage entity based on the provisions in the projects declaration, or under the relevant state statute. The servicer must pay this amount immediately following, but no later than 30 days after, the foreclosure sale date or acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Clearing the priority lien within this time frame ensures XXXX XXXX lien position is preserved and costly delays are avoided when selling the property. XXXX XXXX is revising the reimbursement policy to servicers for the advances made. If an association refuses to release its claim of lien against a property for the amount determined to be the obligated amount after reasonable efforts to reach agreement, the servicer or its foreclosure attorney must contact the XXXX XXXX legal department for further guidance. All other requirements provided in the associated sections of the Servicing Guide remain unchanged. Servicer responsibilities in regards to acquired properties are outlined on the Servicing Guide and as required by applicable state law. Non-compliance with XXXX XXXX policy regarding delinquent HOA dues and assessments may result to repurchase, make whole or indemnification. Servicers should contact their Servicing Consultant, XXXX  XXXX or XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX at XXXX ( XXXX ) with any questions regarding this Announcement. As per New York Department Financial Services XX/XX/XXXX Letter, DILs are well-accepted loss mitigation alternatives to foreclosure and have been incorporated into most servicing standards. XXXX XXXX and HUD both recognize that DILs may be beneficial for borrowers in default who do not qualify for other loss mitigation options. The federal Home Affordable Mortgage Program ( HAMP ) requires participating lenders and mortgage servicers to consider a borrower determined to be eligible for a HAMP modification or other home retention option for other foreclosure alternatives, including short sales and DILs. Likewise, as part of the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of XXXX, Congress established a safe harbor for certain qualified loss mitigation plans, including short sales and deeds in lieu offered under the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives ( HAFA ) program. Nothing in this letter affects the responsibilities of a mortgage loan servicer, including one that is an Exempt Organization, with respect to residential mortgage loan delinquencies and loss mitigation efforts under Part 419 of the Superintendents Regulations ( Business Conduct Rules for Servicing Mortgage Loans ).","date_sent_to_company":"2017-08-14T19:49:02.000Z","issue":"Struggling to pay mortgage","sub_product":"FHA mortgage","zip_code":"06830","tags":null,"has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"2628044","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with explanation","submitted_via":"Web","company":"Specialized Loan Servicing Holdings LLC","date_received":"2017-08-14T19:03:24.000Z","state":"CT","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":null},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["As per New York Department Financial Services XX/XX/XXXX Letter, DILs are well-accepted loss mitigation alternatives to foreclosure and <em>have</em> been incorporated into most servicing standards. XXXX XXXX and HUD <em>both</em> recognize that DILs may be beneficial for borrowers in default who do not qualify for other loss mitigation options."]},"sort":[9.39057,"2628044"]},{"_index":"complaint-public-v1","_id":"16845856","_score":9.372479,"_source":{"product":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","complaint_what_happened":"XX/XX/XXXX XXXX  XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, TX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, PA XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, GA XXXX RE : Formal Dispute and Demand for Immediate Deletion of Inaccurate Information Reported by Wells Fargo Bank , N.A . ( WFBNA ) To Whom It May Concern : I am writing to formally dispute inaccurate, misleading, and legally non-compliant information appearing on my consumer credit report ( s ) as furnished by Wells Fargo Bank , N.A . ( WFBNA ). This letter serves as my official notice under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., demanding the immediate investigation and deletion of the disputed items identified herein.\n\nI. Inaccurate Account Information Reported by WFBNA The information reported by WFBNA contains multiple material inaccuracies that have caused substantial harm to my creditworthiness and financial reputation. Specifically, WFBNA has reported the following inaccurate information : Account Balance Discrepancies : The account balance ( s ) reported by WFBNA are demonstrably incorrect and do not reflect the actual amount owed, if any. These inaccurate balance figures misrepresent my financial obligations and have negatively impacted my credit score and ability to obtain credit on favorable terms.\n\nPersonal Information Errors : WFBNA has furnished incorrect personal identifying information, including but not limited to errors in my name, address, Social Security number, date of birth, or employment information. Such inaccuracies raise serious concerns about the integrity of WFBNA 's data management systems and compliance with the FCRA 's accuracy requirements under 15 U.S.C. 1681e ( b ).\n\nII. Violations of Statute of Limitations and Improper Sale of Time-Barred Debt WFBNA has violated applicable statutes of limitations by selling and/or continuing to report account information that is time-barred under state law. By selling this time-barred debt to third-party debt purchasers and collection agencies, WFBNA has engaged in conduct that perpetuates the reporting of obsolete information and facilitates potential illegal collection activities. This practice violates the spirit and intent of both the FCRA and state consumer protection laws, as it enables third parties to profit from debts that are no longer legally enforceable. WFBNA 's sale of such accounts for its own financial benefit, with knowledge that the statute of limitations has expired, constitutes a deceptive trade practice and an abuse of the credit reporting system.\n\nIII. Violations of the Seven-Year Reporting Rule Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681c ( a ) ( 4 ), consumer reporting agencies are prohibited from reporting accounts placed for collection or charged off that antedate the report by more than seven years. WFBNA has violated this statutory mandate by reporting account information that exceeds the permissible seven-year reporting period. The continued reporting of obsolete negative information beyond the statutory time limit is unlawful and has caused me ongoing harm by artificially depressing my credit score and limiting my access to credit, employment, and housing opportunities.\n\nMoreover, WFBNA 's reporting of inaccurate balance information in connection with these time-barred accounts compounds the violation by creating the false impression that these debts remain active and enforceable, when in fact they should have been removed from my credit report entirely.\n\nIV. Applicable Legal Standards and Requirements The Fair Credit Reporting Act imposes strict obligations on both furnishers of information and consumer reporting agencies to ensure the accuracy and completeness of reported information. Under 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ), WFBNA, as a furnisher, is required to provide accurate information to consumer reporting agencies and to conduct reasonable investigations when notified of disputes.\n\nAdditionally, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681i, you, as consumer reporting agencies, are required to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation of disputed information within thirty ( 30 ) days of receipt of this dispute. If the information can not be verified as accurate and complete, it must be promptly deleted from my credit file.\n\nV. Documented Harm and Damages The inaccurate information reported by WFBNA has caused me substantial and quantifiable harm, including but not limited to : Significant reduction in my credit score, resulting in denial of credit applications and/or approval only at substantially higher interest rates ; Increased cost of credit, insurance premiums, and other financial products due to artificially depressed credit scores ; Potential adverse employment decisions, as many employers review credit reports as part of the hiring process ; Emotional distress, anxiety, and reputational damage resulting from the false portrayal of my creditworthiness ; Time and expense incurred in identifying, investigating, and disputing these inaccuracies.\n\nVI. Demand for Immediate Deletion In light of the foregoing violations and inaccuracies, I demand that you immediately : 1. Conduct a thorough investigation of all information reported by WFBNA as required under 15 U.S.C. 1681i ; 2. Delete all inaccurate, unverifiable, or obsolete information reported by WFBNA from my credit file ; 3. Remove any and all accounts that violate the seven-year reporting rule pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681c ; 4. Provide me with written confirmation of the deletion of all disputed items within the statutory thirty ( 30 ) day period ; 5. Furnish me with an updated copy of my credit report reflecting the deletions, at no charge, as required under 15 U.S.C. 1681j ( a ) ( 1 ) ( B ).\n\nVII. Preservation of Legal Rights Please be advised that I am preserving all legal rights and remedies available to me under federal and state law, including but not limited to the right to pursue statutory and actual damages under the FCRA. Should you fail to conduct a reasonable investigation, fail to delete the inaccurate information, or fail to respond within the statutory time frame, I will consider all available legal options, including filing a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) and pursuing litigation to vindicate my rights.\n\nThis letter constitutes my formal written dispute under 15 U.S.C. 1681i ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ). I expect full compliance with all FCRA requirements and prompt resolution of this matter.\n\nRespectfully submitted, XXXX XXXX","date_sent_to_company":"2025-10-27T17:47:13.000Z","issue":"Incorrect information on your report","sub_product":"Credit reporting","zip_code":"759XX","tags":"Servicemember","has_narrative":true,"complaint_id":"16845856","timely":"Yes","company_response":"Closed with non-monetary relief","submitted_via":"Web","company":"WELLS FARGO & COMPANY","date_received":"2025-10-27T17:38:24.000Z","state":"TX","company_public_response":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","sub_issue":"Account information incorrect"},"highlight":{"complaint_what_happened":["I expect full <em>compliance</em> with all FCRA requirements and prompt resolution of this matter.\n\nRespectfully submitted, XXXX XXXX"]},"sort":[9.372479,"16845856"]}]},"aggregations":{"has_narrative":{"meta":{},"doc_count":64,"has_narrative":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":1,"key_as_string":"true","doc_count":64}]}},"product":{"doc_count":64,"product":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports","doc_count":26,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit reporting","doc_count":25},{"key":"Other personal consumer report","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Debt collection","doc_count":11,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit card debt","doc_count":7},{"key":"I do not know","doc_count":2},{"key":"Other debt","doc_count":1},{"key":"Rental debt","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Mortgage","doc_count":10,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Conventional home mortgage","doc_count":3},{"key":"FHA mortgage","doc_count":3},{"key":"Other type of mortgage","doc_count":2},{"key":"Home equity loan or line of credit (HELOC)","doc_count":1},{"key":"VA mortgage","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Credit card","doc_count":6,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"General-purpose credit card or charge card","doc_count":6}]}},{"key":"Money transfer, virtual currency, or money service","doc_count":3,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Domestic (US) money transfer","doc_count":2},{"key":"Virtual currency","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Vehicle loan or lease","doc_count":3,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Loan","doc_count":2},{"key":"Lease","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Checking or savings account","doc_count":2,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Checking account","doc_count":2}]}},{"key":"Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports","doc_count":2,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Credit reporting","doc_count":2}]}},{"key":"Payday loan, title loan, personal loan, or advance loan","doc_count":1,"sub_product.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Payday loan","doc_count":1}]}}]}},"issue":{"doc_count":64,"issue":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Incorrect information on your report","doc_count":15,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Account information incorrect","doc_count":10},{"key":"Information belongs to someone else","doc_count":4},{"key":"Account status incorrect","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Improper use of your report","doc_count":6,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Reporting company used your report improperly","doc_count":5},{"key":"Credit inquiries on your report that you don't recognize","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Trouble during payment process","doc_count":5,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Trying to communicate with the company to fix an issue while managing or servicing your loan","doc_count":3},{"key":"Escrow, taxes, or insurance","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem","doc_count":4,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Their investigation did not fix an error on your report","doc_count":4}]}},{"key":"Struggling to pay mortgage","doc_count":4,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Applying for or obtaining a modification, forbearance plan, short sale, or deed-in-lieu","doc_count":1},{"key":"Foreclosure","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Took or threatened to take negative or legal action","doc_count":4,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Sued you without properly notifying you of lawsuit","doc_count":3},{"key":"Threatened or suggested your credit would be damaged","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Written notification about debt","doc_count":3,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Didn't receive notice of right to dispute","doc_count":3}]}},{"key":"Attempts to collect debt not owed","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Debt is not yours","doc_count":2}]}},{"key":"Closing your account","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Company closed your account","doc_count":2}]}},{"key":"Fraud or scam","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Problem with personal statement of dispute","doc_count":1},{"key":"Their investigation did not fix an error on your report","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Struggling to pay your loan","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Denied request to lower payments","doc_count":1},{"key":"Lender trying to repossess or disable the vehicle","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Trouble using your card","doc_count":2,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Can't use card to make purchases","doc_count":1},{"key":"Credit card company won't increase or decrease your credit limit","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Charged fees or interest you didn't expect","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Closing an account","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Fees charged for closing account","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Closing on a mortgage","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Closing disclosure or other related disclosures","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Electronic communications","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Used obscene, profane, or other abusive language","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"False statements or representation","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Attempted to collect wrong amount","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Other transaction problem","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[]}},{"key":"Problem when making payments","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Problem during payment process","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Problem with a company's investigation into an existing issue","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Investigation took more than 30 days","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Problem with a lender or other company charging your account","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Can't stop withdrawals from your account","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Repossession","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Account reinstatement or redemption after repossession","doc_count":1}]}},{"key":"Unable to get your credit report or credit score","doc_count":1,"sub_issue.raw":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Other problem getting your report or credit score","doc_count":1}]}}]}},"timely":{"doc_count":64,"timely":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Yes","doc_count":64}]}},"company_response":{"doc_count":64,"company_response":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Closed with explanation","doc_count":50},{"key":"Closed with non-monetary relief","doc_count":13},{"key":"Closed with monetary relief","doc_count":1}]}},"submitted_via":{"doc_count":64,"submitted_via":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Web","doc_count":64}]}},"company":{"doc_count":64,"company":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.","doc_count":9},{"key":"EQUIFAX, INC.","doc_count":6},{"key":"Experian Information Solutions Inc.","doc_count":6},{"key":"Early Warning Services, LLC","doc_count":3},{"key":"Ocwen Financial Corporation","doc_count":3},{"key":"DISCOVER BANK","doc_count":2},{"key":"ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC.","doc_count":2},{"key":"JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.","doc_count":2},{"key":"AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY","doc_count":1},{"key":"Aldridge Pite, LLP","doc_count":1},{"key":"Atlantic Union Bankshares, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Block, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Byrider Franchising, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION","doc_count":1},{"key":"CCS Financial Services, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"EASTERN BANKSHARES INC","doc_count":1},{"key":"GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA","doc_count":1},{"key":"Gurstel Law Firm, P.C.","doc_count":1},{"key":"HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA","doc_count":1},{"key":"Harris & Harris, Ltd.","doc_count":1},{"key":"INTERNAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC","doc_count":1},{"key":"NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION","doc_count":1},{"key":"National Enterprise Systems, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"OneMain Finance Corporation","doc_count":1},{"key":"PNC Bank N.A.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Payward Ventures Inc. dba Kraken","doc_count":1},{"key":"ProCollect, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Rosebud Economic Development Corporation","doc_count":1},{"key":"Rowland Avenue Management, Inc. A/KA Columbia Debt Recovery, LLC d/b/a Genesis","doc_count":1},{"key":"Shellpoint Partners, LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"Specialized Loan Servicing Holdings LLC","doc_count":1},{"key":"Summit A*R, Inc.","doc_count":1},{"key":"Synovus Bank","doc_count":1},{"key":"TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION","doc_count":1},{"key":"U.S. BANCORP","doc_count":1},{"key":"WELLS FARGO & COMPANY","doc_count":1},{"key":"WSFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION","doc_count":1},{"key":"ZWICKER & ASSOCIATES","doc_count":1},{"key":"Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC","doc_count":1}]}},"state":{"doc_count":64,"state":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"FL","doc_count":12},{"key":"TX","doc_count":10},{"key":"CA","doc_count":5},{"key":"GA","doc_count":4},{"key":"MN","doc_count":4},{"key":"IL","doc_count":3},{"key":"NY","doc_count":3},{"key":"AL","doc_count":2},{"key":"CT","doc_count":2},{"key":"MA","doc_count":2},{"key":"MO","doc_count":2},{"key":"OH","doc_count":2},{"key":"WA","doc_count":2},{"key":"AZ","doc_count":1},{"key":"DE","doc_count":1},{"key":"MD","doc_count":1},{"key":"MI","doc_count":1},{"key":"MT","doc_count":1},{"key":"NC","doc_count":1},{"key":"NE","doc_count":1},{"key":"NV","doc_count":1},{"key":"OR","doc_count":1},{"key":"PA","doc_count":1},{"key":"VA","doc_count":1}]}},"company_public_response":{"doc_count":64,"company_public_response":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response","doc_count":27},{"key":"Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law","doc_count":5},{"key":"Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint","doc_count":1}]}},"tags":{"doc_count":64,"tags":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Servicemember","doc_count":11},{"key":"Older American","doc_count":1},{"key":"Older American, Servicemember","doc_count":1}]}}},"_meta":{"license":"CC0","last_updated":"2026-07-14T12:00:00-05:00","last_indexed":"2026-07-14T12:00:00-05:00","total_record_count":16441818,"is_data_stale":false,"has_data_issue":false,"break_points":{"2":[9.369982,"16845856"],"3":[4.926224,"22355283"]}}}